Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜钬激光碎石术与腹腔镜胆管探查术治疗胆管结石的疗效和安全性比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Laparoscopic Holmium laser Lithotripsy and Laparoscopic Bile Duct Exploration for Bile Duct Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu Province, China.

Key Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostics and Precision Medicine for Surgical Oncology in Gansu Province, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu Province, China.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2023 Jul;47(7):1809-1820. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-06995-6. Epub 2023 Apr 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic holmium laser lithotripsy (LHLL) has been used to treat bile duct stones with unclear outcomes. A meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the LHLL and laparoscopic bile duct exploration (LBDE) efficacy and safety in treating bile duct stones.

METHODS

The correlational studies were searched databases, such as PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP, to identify eligible studies from inception to July 2022. The dichotomous and continuous outcomes were evaluated using odds ratio (OR), risk difference (RD) and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Stata 15.0 and Review Manager 5.3 software helped in data analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies with 1,890 patients, primarily from China, were included. The results indicated that operation time (WMD = - 26.94; 95% CI:(- 34.30, - 19.58); P < 0.00001), estimated blood loss (WMD = - 17.97; 95% CI: (- 22.94, - 13.00); P = 0.002), rate of residual stone (OR = 0.15, 95%CI: (0.10, 0.23); P < 0.00001), length of hospital stay (WMD = - 2.88; 95% CI:(- 3.80, - 1.96); P < 0.00001) and time to bowel function recovery (WMD = - 0.59; 95% CI: (- 0.76, - 0.41); P < 0.00001) had statistically significant differences between the two groups. In postoperative complications, biliary leakage (RD = -0.03; 95% CI: (- 0.05, -0.00); P = 0.02), infection (RD = - 0.06; 95% CI: (- 0.09,- 0.03); P < 0.00001) and Hepatic injury (RD = - 0.06; 95% CI: (- 0.11, - 0.01); P = 0.02) revealed statistically significant differences. However, no significant differences were observed in biliary damage (RD = - 0.03; 95% CI: (- 0.06, 0.00); P = 0.06) and hemobilia (RD = - 0.03; 95% CI: (- 0.06, 0.00); P = 0.08).

CONCLUSION

The current meta-analysis indicated that LHLL could be more effective and safer than LBDC. However, these results should be confirmed with a larger sample size and rigorously designed randomized controlled trials.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜钬激光碎石术(LHLL)已被用于治疗胆管结石,但疗效尚不清楚。本研究进行了荟萃分析,旨在探讨 LHLL 与腹腔镜胆管探查术(LBDE)治疗胆管结石的疗效和安全性。

方法

检索了 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science、CNKI、万方和 VIP 等数据库,以确定从研究开始到 2022 年 7 月的相关研究。使用比值比(OR)、风险差(RD)和加权均数差(WMD)及其 95%置信区间(CI)评估二分类和连续结局。Stata 15.0 和 Review Manager 5.3 软件用于数据分析。

结果

共纳入 23 项研究,涉及 1890 例患者,主要来自中国。结果表明,手术时间(WMD=-26.94;95%CI:-34.30,-19.58;P<0.00001)、估计出血量(WMD=-17.97;95%CI:-22.94,-13.00;P=0.002)、残余结石率(OR=0.15,95%CI:0.10,0.23;P<0.00001)、住院时间(WMD=-2.88;95%CI:-3.80,-1.96;P<0.00001)和肠道功能恢复时间(WMD=-0.59;95%CI:-0.76,-0.41;P<0.00001)差异有统计学意义。术后并发症方面,胆漏(RD=-0.03;95%CI:-0.05,-0.00;P=0.02)、感染(RD=-0.06;95%CI:-0.09,-0.03;P<0.00001)和肝损伤(RD=-0.06;95%CI:-0.11,-0.01;P=0.02)差异有统计学意义。但胆损伤(RD=-0.03;95%CI:-0.06,0.00;P=0.06)和血胆汁(RD=-0.03;95%CI:-0.06,0.00;P=0.08)差异无统计学意义。

结论

本荟萃分析表明,LHLL 可能比 LBDE 更有效、更安全。然而,这些结果需要更大的样本量和更严格设计的随机对照试验来证实。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验