文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

腹腔镜胆总管探查术治疗困难性胆管结石的安全性和有效性:单中心 8 年经验及文献复习。

Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for the patients with difficult biliary stones: 8 years of experiences at a single institution and literature review.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China.

Department of General Surgery, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200336, China.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2022 Jan;36(1):718-727. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08340-1. Epub 2021 Feb 22.


DOI:10.1007/s00464-021-08340-1
PMID:33619595
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has gained wide popularity for the treatment of choledocholithiasis. However, it remains unclear whether LCBDE is a better alternative option for the patients with difficult biliary stones. Thus, the aim of the present study was to explore the safety and efficacy of LCBDE for these patients by retrospectively analyzing our data and combing with literature review. METHODS: Between September 2011 and February 2019, 1064 consecutive patients who underwent LCBDE at Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital were reviewed. The clinical data of patients with difficult biliary stones were selected and retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Of these patients, 334 cases were confirmed with difficult biliary stones, and the overall complete stone clearance rate was 98.8% (330/334). 34 cases (10.2%) were performed with laser lithotripsy. A total of 296 patients (88.6%) underwent primary closure of common bile duct, and T-tube drainage was indwelled in 38 patients (11.4%). No bile duct injury, bleeding, perforation and surgery-related deaths were observed. The overall morbidity rate was 6.6%. 16 cases (4.8%) occurred in bile leakage with primary closure procedure, and all of them were managed successfully with conservative therapy. The median follow-up period was 9 months with stone recurrence occurring in 9 patients (2.7%). There was no evidence of bile duct stricture in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: The current study suggests that LCBED is a considerable safe and effective option for the patients with difficult biliary stones. A randomized clinical trial is needed to further evaluate the benefit of LCBDE in this subgroup.

摘要

背景:腹腔镜胆总管探查术(LCBDE)已广泛应用于治疗胆总管结石。然而,对于有困难的胆管结石患者,LCBDE 是否是更好的选择尚不清楚。因此,本研究旨在通过回顾性分析我院数据并结合文献复习,探讨 LCBDE 治疗此类患者的安全性和有效性。

方法:回顾性分析 2011 年 9 月至 2019 年 2 月期间在上海第十人民医院行 LCBDE 的 1064 例连续患者的临床资料,选择并分析有困难的胆管结石患者的临床资料。

结果:其中 334 例患者被确诊为有困难的胆管结石,总体完全结石清除率为 98.8%(330/334)。34 例(10.2%)患者行激光碎石术。296 例(88.6%)患者行胆总管一期缝合,38 例(11.4%)患者留置 T 管引流。无胆管损伤、出血、穿孔和手术相关死亡病例。总并发症发生率为 6.6%。16 例(4.8%)行胆总管一期缝合术患者发生胆漏,均经保守治疗成功。中位随访时间为 9 个月,9 例(2.7%)患者结石复发,均无胆管狭窄证据。

结论:LCBDE 治疗有困难的胆管结石患者是一种安全有效的方法。需要进一步开展随机临床试验来评估 LCBDE 对该亚组患者的益处。

相似文献

[1]
Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for the patients with difficult biliary stones: 8 years of experiences at a single institution and literature review.

Surg Endosc. 2022-1

[2]
Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration via choledochotomy with primary closure for the management of acute cholangitis caused by common bile duct stones.

Surg Endosc. 2022-7

[3]
Clinical role of frequency-doubled double-pulse neodymium YAG laser lithotripsy for removal of difficult biliary stones in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

ANZ J Surg. 2019-9

[4]
Five hundred consecutive laparoscopic common bile duct explorations: 5-year experience at a single institution.

Surg Endosc. 2016-12-30

[5]
Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with non-severe acute cholangitis.

Updates Surg. 2022-6

[6]
Primary closure and rate of bile leak following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration via choledochotomy.

Dig Surg. 2015

[7]
Primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is safe and feasible for patients with non-severe acute cholangitis.

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022-6

[8]
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Surg Endosc. 2003-11

[9]
Is T-tube drainage no longer needed for laparoscopic common bile duct exploration? A retrospective analysis and literature review.

Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2023-3

[10]
Comparison of emergent versus elective laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for patients with or without nonsevere acute cholangitis complicated with common bile duct stones.

J Surg Res. 2013-12-10

引用本文的文献

[1]
[Laparoscopic modified transcystic biliary drainage for the treatment of biliary stones and diagnosis of biliary disease].

Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2025-8-18

[2]
Ice-breaking sign: A radiological sign influencing the treatment strategies for choledocholithiasis.

World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025-7-27

[3]
Risk factors for bile leakage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in older patients with choledocholithiasis.

World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025-4-27

[4]
Safety and effectiveness of modified laparoscopic transcystic biliary drainage in the treatment of choledocholithiasis: study protocol for a prospective single-arm clinical trial.

BMJ Open. 2025-4-23

[5]
The incidence, technical management and outcomes of impacted stones encountered during 1447 laparoscopic bile duct explorations.

Surg Endosc. 2025-2

[6]
Is an 8 mm cutoff necessary when performing primary common bile duct closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration?

Pak J Med Sci. 2024-12

[7]
The safety and efficacy of primary duct closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with mild-to-moderate calculus-associated acute cholangitis: a retrospective cohort study.

Updates Surg. 2024-12

[8]
Exploring Risk Factors for Post-operative Complications in Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration: A Literature Review.

Cureus. 2024-10-28

[9]
Comparison of 1-stage and 2-stage Managements for Common Bile Duct Stones and Gallstones (CBDS): A Retrospective Study.

J Clin Gastroenterol. 2025-3-1

[10]
Clinical application of indocyanine green fluorescence navigation technique in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for complex hepatolithiasis.

BMC Surg. 2024-4-20

本文引用的文献

[1]
Single-stage management of choledocholithiasis: intraoperative ERCP versus laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Surg Endosc. 2020-10

[2]
10 years of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: A single tertiary institution experience.

Am J Surg. 2020-4

[3]
Endoscopic Management of Complex Biliary Stone Disease.

Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2019-4

[4]
Single-operator peroral cholangioscope in treating difficult biliary stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dig Endosc. 2018-12-21

[5]
Comparison of the Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation Alone versus Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Removal of Bile Duct Stones.

Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2018-7-2

[6]
Risk factors and consequences of conversion to open surgery in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Surg Endosc. 2018-7-9

[7]
Laparoscopic Choledochotomy in a Solitary Common Duct Stone: A Prospective Study.

Minim Invasive Surg. 2018-5-14

[8]
Endoscopic Management of Difficult Bile Duct Stones.

Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2018-3-23

[9]
The Safety and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Combined with Cholecystectomy for the Management of Cholecysto-choledocholithiasis: An Up-to-date Meta-analysis.

Ann Surg. 2018-8

[10]
The economic impact of using single-operator cholangioscopy for the treatment of difficult bile duct stones and diagnosis of indeterminate bile duct strictures.

Endoscopy. 2017-11-24

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索