Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Department of General Surgery, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200336, China.
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jan;36(1):718-727. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08340-1. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has gained wide popularity for the treatment of choledocholithiasis. However, it remains unclear whether LCBDE is a better alternative option for the patients with difficult biliary stones. Thus, the aim of the present study was to explore the safety and efficacy of LCBDE for these patients by retrospectively analyzing our data and combing with literature review. METHODS: Between September 2011 and February 2019, 1064 consecutive patients who underwent LCBDE at Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital were reviewed. The clinical data of patients with difficult biliary stones were selected and retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Of these patients, 334 cases were confirmed with difficult biliary stones, and the overall complete stone clearance rate was 98.8% (330/334). 34 cases (10.2%) were performed with laser lithotripsy. A total of 296 patients (88.6%) underwent primary closure of common bile duct, and T-tube drainage was indwelled in 38 patients (11.4%). No bile duct injury, bleeding, perforation and surgery-related deaths were observed. The overall morbidity rate was 6.6%. 16 cases (4.8%) occurred in bile leakage with primary closure procedure, and all of them were managed successfully with conservative therapy. The median follow-up period was 9 months with stone recurrence occurring in 9 patients (2.7%). There was no evidence of bile duct stricture in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: The current study suggests that LCBED is a considerable safe and effective option for the patients with difficult biliary stones. A randomized clinical trial is needed to further evaluate the benefit of LCBDE in this subgroup.
背景:腹腔镜胆总管探查术(LCBDE)已广泛应用于治疗胆总管结石。然而,对于有困难的胆管结石患者,LCBDE 是否是更好的选择尚不清楚。因此,本研究旨在通过回顾性分析我院数据并结合文献复习,探讨 LCBDE 治疗此类患者的安全性和有效性。
方法:回顾性分析 2011 年 9 月至 2019 年 2 月期间在上海第十人民医院行 LCBDE 的 1064 例连续患者的临床资料,选择并分析有困难的胆管结石患者的临床资料。
结果:其中 334 例患者被确诊为有困难的胆管结石,总体完全结石清除率为 98.8%(330/334)。34 例(10.2%)患者行激光碎石术。296 例(88.6%)患者行胆总管一期缝合,38 例(11.4%)患者留置 T 管引流。无胆管损伤、出血、穿孔和手术相关死亡病例。总并发症发生率为 6.6%。16 例(4.8%)行胆总管一期缝合术患者发生胆漏,均经保守治疗成功。中位随访时间为 9 个月,9 例(2.7%)患者结石复发,均无胆管狭窄证据。
结论:LCBDE 治疗有困难的胆管结石患者是一种安全有效的方法。需要进一步开展随机临床试验来评估 LCBDE 对该亚组患者的益处。
Surg Endosc. 2003-11
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2023-3
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2025-8-18
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025-7-27
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025-4-27
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2025-3-1
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2019-4
Minim Invasive Surg. 2018-5-14
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2018-3-23