Suppr超能文献

气管插管低氧血症患者呼吸驱动力增加的临床危险因素。

Clinical risk factors for increased respiratory drive in intubated hypoxemic patients.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2023 Apr 11;27(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04402-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is very limited evidence identifying factors that increase respiratory drive in hypoxemic intubated patients. Most physiological determinants of respiratory drive cannot be directly assessed at the bedside (e.g., neural inputs from chemo- or mechano-receptors), but clinical risk factors commonly measured in intubated patients could be correlated with increased drive. We aimed to identify clinical risk factors independently associated with increased respiratory drive in intubated hypoxemic patients.

METHODS

We analyzed the physiological dataset from a multicenter trial on intubated hypoxemic patients on pressure support (PS). Patients with simultaneous assessment of the inspiratory drop in airway pressure at 0.1-s during an occlusion (P) and risk factors for increased respiratory drive on day 1 were included. We evaluated the independent correlation of the following clinical risk factors for increased drive with P: severity of lung injury (unilateral vs. bilateral pulmonary infiltrates, PaO/FiO, ventilatory ratio); arterial blood gases (PaO, PaCO and pHa); sedation (RASS score and drug type); SOFA score; arterial lactate; ventilation settings (PEEP, level of PS, addition of sigh breaths).

RESULTS

Two-hundred seventeen patients were included. Clinical risk factors independently correlated with higher P were bilateral infiltrates (increase ratio [IR] 1.233, 95%CI 1.047-1.451, p = 0.012); lower PaO/FiO (IR 0.998, 95%CI 0.997-0.999, p = 0.004); higher ventilatory ratio (IR 1.538, 95%CI 1.267-1.867, p < 0.001); lower pHa (IR 0.104, 95%CI 0.024-0.464, p = 0.003). Higher PEEP was correlated with lower P (IR 0.951, 95%CI 0.921-0.982, p = 0.002), while sedation depth and drugs were not associated with P.

CONCLUSIONS

Independent clinical risk factors for higher respiratory drive in intubated hypoxemic patients include the extent of lung edema and of ventilation-perfusion mismatch, lower pHa, and lower PEEP, while sedation strategy does not affect drive. These data underline the multifactorial nature of increased respiratory drive.

摘要

背景

目前仅有有限的证据可以确定增加低氧血症插管患者呼吸驱动的因素。大多数呼吸驱动的生理决定因素不能在床边直接评估(例如,化学或机械感受器的神经输入),但在插管患者中通常测量的临床危险因素可能与呼吸驱动增加相关。我们旨在确定与低氧血症插管患者呼吸驱动增加相关的独立临床危险因素。

方法

我们分析了一项关于压力支持(PS)下插管低氧血症患者的多中心试验的生理数据集。纳入了同时评估在吸气阻断 0.1 秒期间气道压力下降(P)和第 1 天增加呼吸驱动风险因素的患者。我们评估了以下临床危险因素与 P 增加的独立相关性:肺损伤严重程度(单侧与双侧肺浸润、PaO/FiO、通气比);动脉血气(PaO、PaCO 和 pHa);镇静(RASS 评分和药物类型);SOFA 评分;动脉乳酸;通气设置(PEEP、PS 水平、叹气呼吸的添加)。

结果

共纳入 217 例患者。与较高 P 相关的临床危险因素是双侧浸润(增加比 [IR] 1.233,95%CI 1.047-1.451,p=0.012);较低的 PaO/FiO(IR 0.998,95%CI 0.997-0.999,p=0.004);更高的通气比(IR 1.538,95%CI 1.267-1.867,p<0.001);较低的 pHa(IR 0.104,95%CI 0.024-0.464,p=0.003)。较高的 PEEP 与较低的 P 相关(IR 0.951,95%CI 0.921-0.982,p=0.002),而镇静深度和药物与 P 无关。

结论

插管低氧血症患者呼吸驱动增加的独立临床危险因素包括肺水肿和通气-灌注不匹配的程度、较低的 pHa 和较低的 PEEP,而镇静策略并不影响驱动。这些数据强调了呼吸驱动增加的多因素性质。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a13e/10088111/39db898e45d0/13054_2023_4402_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验