Suppr超能文献

早期结局作为比较卒中护理质量的医院指标的有效性。

Validity of Early Outcomes as Indicators for Comparing Hospitals on Quality of Stroke Care.

机构信息

Department of Public Health Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam The Netherlands.

Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management Erasmus University Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Apr 18;12(8):e027647. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.027647. Epub 2023 Apr 12.

Abstract

Background Insight into outcome variation between hospitals could help to improve quality of care. We aimed to assess the validity of early outcomes as quality indicators for acute ischemic stroke care for patients treated with endovascular therapy (EVT). Methods and Results We used data from the MR CLEAN (Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands) Registry, a large multicenter prospective cohort study including 3279 patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing EVT. Random effect linear and proportional odds regression were used to analyze the effect of case mix on between-hospital differences in 2 early outcomes: the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at 24 to 48 hours and the expanded thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score. Between-hospital variation in outcomes was assessed using the variance of random hospital effects (tau). In addition, we estimated the correlation between hospitals' EVT-patient volume and (case-mix-adjusted) outcomes. Both early outcomes and case-mix characteristics varied significantly across hospitals. Between-hospital variation in the expanded thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score was not influenced by case-mix adjustment (tau =0.17 in both models). In contrast, for the NIHSS score at 24 to 48 hours, case-mix adjustment led to a decrease in variation between hospitals (tau decreases from 0.19 to 0.17). Hospitals' EVT-patient volume was strongly correlated with higher expanded thrombolysis in cerebral infarction scores (=0.48) and weakly with lower NIHSS score at 24 to 48 hours (=0.15). Conclusions Between-hospital variation in NIHSS score at 24 to 48 hours is significantly influenced by case-mix but not by patient volume. In contrast, between-hospital variation in expanded thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score is strongly influenced by EVT-patient volume but not by case-mix. Both outcomes may be suitable for comparing hospitals on quality of care, provided that adequate adjustment for case-mix is applied for NIHSS score.

摘要

背景

深入了解医院间的结局差异有助于提高医疗质量。本研究旨在评估早期结局作为血管内治疗(EVT)治疗的急性缺血性卒中患者的护理质量指标的有效性。

方法和结果

我们使用了来自 MR CLEAN(荷兰多中心急性缺血性卒中血管内治疗随机对照试验)登记处的数据,该研究是一项大型多中心前瞻性队列研究,纳入了 3279 名接受 EVT 的急性缺血性卒中患者。我们采用随机效应线性和比例优势比回归分析来分析病例组合对 2 个早期结局(24-48 小时的国立卫生研究院卒中量表[NIHSS]评分和扩展溶栓治疗脑梗死评分)的医院间差异的影响。采用随机医院效应方差(tau)评估结局的医院间变异。此外,我们还估计了医院 EVT 患者数量与(病例组合调整后的)结局之间的相关性。早期结局和病例组合特征在各医院间差异显著。调整病例组合后,扩展溶栓治疗脑梗死评分的医院间差异无明显变化(两种模型中 tau 值均为 0.17)。相比之下,对于 24-48 小时的 NIHSS 评分,病例组合调整导致医院间的变异减少(tau 从 0.19 降至 0.17)。医院 EVT 患者数量与较高的扩展溶栓治疗脑梗死评分呈高度相关(r=0.48),与 24-48 小时 NIHSS 评分呈弱相关(r=0.15)。

结论

24-48 小时 NIHSS 评分的医院间差异受病例组合显著影响,但不受患者数量影响。相反,扩展溶栓治疗脑梗死评分的医院间差异受 EVT 患者数量的强烈影响,但不受病例组合影响。如果对 NIHSS 评分进行适当的病例组合调整,这两个结局都可用于比较医院的护理质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1bc/10227257/7c185b96818c/JAH3-12-e027647-g003.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验