Suppr超能文献

常规临床实践中急性缺血性卒中的血管内治疗:前瞻性观察性队列研究(MR CLEAN注册研究)

Endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke in routine clinical practice: prospective, observational cohort study (MR CLEAN Registry).

作者信息

Jansen Ivo G H, Mulder Maxim J H L, Goldhoorn Robert-Jan B

出版信息

BMJ. 2018 Mar 9;360:k949. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k949.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine outcomes and safety of endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke, due to proximal intracranial vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation, in routine clinical practice.

DESIGN

Ongoing, prospective, observational cohort study.

SETTING

16 centres that perform endovascular treatment in the Netherlands.

PARTICIPANTS

1488 patients included in the Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischaemic Stroke in the Netherlands (MR CLEAN) Registry who had received endovascular treatment, including stent retriever thrombectomy, aspiration, and all alternative methods for acute ischaemic stroke within 6.5 hours from onset of symptoms between March 2014 and June 2016.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death) at 90 days after the onset of symptoms. Secondary outcomes were excellent functional outcome (mRS score 0-1), good functional outcome (mRS score 0-2), and favourable functional outcome (mRS score 0-3) at 90 days; score on the extended thrombolysis in cerebral infarction scale at the end of the intervention procedure; National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 24-48 hours after intervention; and complications that occurred during intervention, hospital admission, or three months' follow up period. Outcomes and safety variables in the MR CLEAN Registry were compared with the MR CLEAN trial intervention and control arms.

RESULTS

A statistically significant shift was observed towards better functional outcome in patients in the MR CLEAN Registry compared with the MR CLEAN trial intervention arm (adjusted common odds ratio 1.30, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.67) and the MR CLEAN trial control arm (1.85, 1.46 to 2.34). The reperfusion rate, with successful reperfusion defined as a score of 2B-3 on the extended thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score, was 58.7%, the same as for patients in the MR CLEAN trial. Duration from onset of stroke to start of endovascular treatment and from onset of stroke to successful reperfusion or last contrast bolus was one hour shorter for patients in the MR CLEAN Registry. Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage occurred in 5.8% of patients in the MR CLEAN Registry compared with 7.7% in the MR CLEAN trial intervention arm and 6.4% in the MR CLEAN trial control arm.

CONCLUSION

In routine clinical practice, endovascular treatment for patients with acute ischaemic stroke is at least as effective and safe as in the setting of a randomised controlled trial.

摘要

目的

在常规临床实践中,确定血管内治疗急性缺血性卒中(由前循环近端颅内血管闭塞所致)的疗效和安全性。

设计

正在进行的前瞻性观察性队列研究。

地点

荷兰16个进行血管内治疗的中心。

参与者

纳入荷兰急性缺血性卒中血管内治疗多中心随机对照试验(MR CLEAN)登记处的1488例接受血管内治疗的患者,包括支架取栓、抽吸以及2014年3月至2016年6月症状发作6.5小时内急性缺血性卒中的所有其他替代方法。

主要结局指标

主要结局为症状发作后90天的改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分,范围从0(无症状)至6(死亡)。次要结局为90天时的良好功能结局(mRS评分0 - 1)、较好功能结局(mRS评分0 - 2)和有利功能结局(mRS评分0 - 3);干预程序结束时的脑梗死扩展溶栓量表评分;干预后24 - 48小时的美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分;以及干预、住院或三个月随访期间发生的并发症。将MR CLEAN登记处的结局和安全性变量与MR CLEAN试验的干预组和对照组进行比较。

结果

与MR CLEAN试验干预组(校正共同比值比1.30,95%置信区间1.02至1.67)和MR CLEAN试验对照组(1.85,1.46至2.34)相比,MR CLEAN登记处的患者在功能结局改善方面有统计学意义的变化。再灌注率(成功再灌注定义为脑梗死扩展溶栓量表评分为2B - 3)为58.7%,与MR CLEAN试验的患者相同。MR CLEAN登记处的患者从卒中发作到开始血管内治疗以及从卒中发作到成功再灌注或最后一次造影剂推注的时间缩短了1小时。MR CLEAN登记处5.8%的患者发生症状性颅内出血,而MR CLEAN试验干预组为7.7%,MR CLEAN试验对照组为6.4%。

结论

在常规临床实践中,急性缺血性卒中患者的血管内治疗至少与随机对照试验中的治疗一样有效和安全。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8282/5844245/9c01d3391d0a/jani042044.f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验