Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology Surgery & Spine Surgery, CHU de Nîmes, Univ Montpellier, Place du Pr. Robert Debré 30029, Nîmes Cédex 9, France.
Visceral and Digestive Surgery Department, CHU de Nimes, University Montpellier 1, Nîmes, France.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Jul;31(7):2754-2761. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07366-3. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
External snapping hip is caused by the iliotibial band snapping from the greater trochanter during hip movement. The aim of this study was to compare a technique of ultrasound-guided iliotibial band release versus a similar endoscopic technique.
An anatomical study was performed on 10 cadavers i.e. 20 hips. The same operator performed ultrasound-guided and endoscopic iliotibial band release on either side of each specimen. An independent operator performed an open control to verify the outcome measures. The primary outcome was iliotibial cutting percentage, defined as the ratio of the transversal cut distance and the width of the iliotibial at the most prominent portion of the great trochanter. Secondary outcomes included nerve injuries. The surgical time was assessed and disposable medical supplies costs were estimated.
The average cutting percentage was 95% ± 8 by ultrasound, compared with 91% ± 11 by endoscopy (n.s.). No iatrogenic lesions were found, particularly nerve damage. The average duration of the ultrasound procedure was 12.3 minutes ± 6 compared to 21 minutes ± 10.7 for endoscopy (p=0.04), with a 3-fold decrease between the first and last procedure, regardless of the technique. The ultrasound procedure was 3 times less expensive in terms of disposable medical supplies (120.5€ versus 353.5€).
This technique of ultrasound-guided iliotibial band release appears to be as effective and safe as a similar endoscopic technique. The surgical time is reasonable for a surgeon trained in ultrasound, with lower disposable supplies costs. A comparative clinical study is further needed to assess the actual benefits of each technique.
弹响髋是由于阔筋膜张肌在髋关节运动时从大转子上弹回而引起的。本研究旨在比较超声引导髂胫束松解术与类似的内镜技术。
对 10 具尸体(即 20 髋)进行解剖研究。同一位术者在每个标本的两侧分别进行超声引导和内镜下髂胫束松解术。一位独立的术者进行开放对照以验证结果测量。主要结果是髂胫束切割百分比,定义为横切距离与大转子最突出部位髂胫束宽度的比值。次要结果包括神经损伤。评估手术时间并估计一次性医疗用品成本。
超声平均切割百分比为 95%±8%,内镜为 91%±11%(n.s.)。未发现医源性损伤,特别是神经损伤。超声手术的平均时间为 12.3 分钟±6 分钟,而内镜为 21 分钟±10.7 分钟(p=0.04),无论采用何种技术,第一次和最后一次手术之间的时间都减少了 3 倍。就一次性医疗用品而言,超声手术的费用降低了 3 倍(120.5 欧元对 353.5 欧元)。
这种超声引导髂胫束松解术似乎与类似的内镜技术同样有效和安全。对于接受过超声培训的外科医生来说,手术时间合理,一次性用品成本较低。进一步需要进行比较临床研究来评估每种技术的实际益处。