Monash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Peninsula Campus. Moorooduc Hwy, VIC, Australia; National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia.
National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia; Social and Global Studies Centre and Digital Ethnography Research Centre, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Int J Drug Policy. 2023 May;115:104015. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104015. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
Australia is yet to see widespread fentanyl-contaminated heroin, despite the established presence of fentanyl in other countries. International mortality trends alongside a local cluster of fentanyl-related deaths prompted interest in developing methods to monitor for fentanyl and other potentially harmful novel psychoactive substances (NPS) in Australia.
We tested novel methods to monitor for fentanyl and other NPS. From 2017-2021, clients from supervised injecting facilities (SIFs) in Melbourne and Sydney, Australia, contributed urine screens (UDS) with BTNX Rapid Response™ fentanyl test strips (FTS) paired with surveys, and injecting equipment associated with opioid overdoses for laboratory analysis. A single site piloted drug checking using FTS with laboratory confirmation. Two workshops were conducted with SIF staff, content experts and people with lived experience to determine how results can inform practices within SIFs.
Of the 911 UDS with FTS conducted, less than 1% (n=8) yielded positive results that were not explained by self-reported pharmaceutical fentanyl use, with two laboratory confirmed fentanyl positive results. Injecting equipment from 59 overdoses was tested and neither fentanyl nor other NPS were identified. Drug checking with FTS (n=34) indicated the presence of fentanyl on three tests. Two specimens were subsequently sent for laboratory testing and classified as false positives as the presence of fentanyl was not confirmed. Workshop participants (n=21) felt routine monitoring with FTS currently had limited value. A process for using pre-defined signals to trigger surveillance was developed.
The high false positive rates with FTS, relative to the small number of positive results and potential for them to undermine confidence in FTS emphasised the need for confirmatory testing. The role of routine surveillance was unclear within the current low-fentanyl context, however, a process was developed to upscale testing should signals of increased fentanyl prevalence in the Australian heroin market emerge.
尽管其他国家已经存在芬太尼,但澳大利亚尚未广泛出现芬太尼污染的海洛因。国际死亡率趋势以及当地与芬太尼相关的死亡集群促使人们有兴趣开发监测澳大利亚芬太尼和其他潜在有害新型精神活性物质(NPS)的方法。
我们测试了监测芬太尼和其他 NPS 的新方法。从 2017 年到 2021 年,澳大利亚墨尔本和悉尼的监督注射设施(SIF)的客户提供了尿液筛查(UDS),并使用 BTNX 快速反应™芬太尼测试条(FTS)与调查配对,以及与阿片类药物过量相关的注射设备进行实验室分析。一个地点试点使用 FTS 进行药物检测,并进行实验室确认。与 SIF 工作人员、内容专家和有生活经验的人进行了两次研讨会,以确定结果如何为 SIF 内的实践提供信息。
在进行的 911 次 UDS 中,不到 1%(n=8)的结果呈阳性,且无法用自我报告的药物芬太尼使用来解释,其中 2 项实验室确认的芬太尼阳性结果。对 59 例过量用药的注射设备进行了检测,未发现芬太尼或其他 NPS。使用 FTS 进行药物检测(n=34)表明有 3 次检测结果呈阳性。随后对其中两个样本进行了实验室检测,被归类为假阳性,因为没有确认芬太尼的存在。研讨会参与者(n=21)认为目前使用 FTS 进行常规监测的价值有限。制定了一个使用预定义信号触发监测的流程。
FTS 的假阳性率相对较高,而阳性结果的数量较少,并且可能会破坏对 FTS 的信心,这强调了需要进行确认性测试。在当前低芬太尼背景下,常规监测的作用尚不清楚,但是开发了一个流程,以便在澳大利亚海洛因市场中出现芬太尼流行率增加的信号时扩大测试范围。