Suppr超能文献

超短效麻醉后的恢复时间。四种技术的比较。

Recovery time after ultrabrief anaesthesia. A comparison of four techniques.

作者信息

Butt A D

出版信息

S Afr Med J. 1986 May 24;69(11):677-80.

PMID:3704856
Abstract

Recovery time after ultrabrief anaesthesia for minor gynaecological procedures was shown to be significantly and appreciably longer after thiopentone induction than after Althesin (alphaxalone and alphadolone), etomidate or propanidid. Suitable anaesthesia was provided by all techniques, but propanidid is associated with a 51% rise in pulse rate and etomidate with an 18% slowing. Twenty-seven per cent of patients anaesthetized with propanidid or etomidate were nauseous or vomited immediately postoperatively. Oxytocin 5 U given as an intravenous bolus for uterine contraction markedly increased heart rate (+ 29%). Althesin is now excluded on the basis of occasional adverse reactions; none of the techniques used is entirely satisfactory.

摘要

对于小型妇科手术,硫喷妥钠诱导后的超短效麻醉恢复时间明显长于阿耳忒辛(α-羟孕酮和α-羟孕二酮)、依托咪酯或丙泮尼地诱导后的恢复时间。所有技术均能提供合适的麻醉效果,但丙泮尼地会使脉搏率升高51%,依托咪酯会使脉搏率减慢18%。使用丙泮尼地或依托咪酯麻醉的患者中有27%在术后立即出现恶心或呕吐。静脉推注5单位缩宫素用于子宫收缩会使心率显著增加(+29%)。由于偶尔会出现不良反应,现在已不再使用阿耳忒辛;所使用的技术均不完全令人满意。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验