Nagata Koudai, Inaba Keitaro, Kimoto Katsuhiko, Kawana Hiromasa
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology, Kanagawa Dental University, 82 Inaoka-cho, Yokosuka 238-8580, Japan.
Department of Oral Microbiology, Kanagawa Dental University, 82 Inaoka-cho, Yokosuka 238-8580, Japan.
Materials (Basel). 2023 Mar 25;16(7):2620. doi: 10.3390/ma16072620.
Based on the hypothesis that the fabrication of dental models using fused deposition modeling and poly-lactic acid (PLA), followed by recycling and reusing, would reduce industrial waste, we aimed to compare the accuracies of virgin and recycled PLA models. The PLA models were recycled using a crusher and a filament-manufacturing machine. Virgin PLA was labeled R, and the first, second, and third recycles were labeled R1, R2, and R3, respectively. To determine the accuracies of the virgin and reused PLA models, identical provisional crowns were fitted, and marginal fits were obtained using micro-computed tomography. A marginal fit of 120 µm was deemed acceptable based on previous literature. The mesial, distal, buccal, and palatal centers were set at M, D, B, and P, respectively. The mean value of each measurement point was considered as the result. When comparing the accuracies of R and R1, R2, and R3, significant differences were noted between R and R3 at B, R and R2, R3 at P, and R and R3 at D ( < 0.05). No significant difference was observed at M. This study demonstrates that PLA can be recycled only once owing to accuracy limitations.
基于这样的假设,即使用熔融沉积建模和聚乳酸(PLA)制造牙科模型,然后进行回收再利用,将减少工业废料,我们旨在比较原始PLA模型和回收PLA模型的精度。PLA模型使用破碎机和丝状制造机进行回收。原始PLA标记为R,第一次、第二次和第三次回收分别标记为R1、R2和R3。为了确定原始PLA模型和再利用PLA模型的精度,安装相同的临时牙冠,并使用微型计算机断层扫描获得边缘适合度。根据先前的文献,120微米的边缘适合度被认为是可接受的。近中、远中、颊侧和腭侧中心分别设置为M、D、B和P。每个测量点的平均值被视为结果。比较R与R1、R2和R3的精度时,在B处R与R3之间、在P处R与R2、R3之间以及在D处R与R3之间存在显著差异(<0.05)。在M处未观察到显著差异。本研究表明,由于精度限制,PLA只能回收一次。