NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Department of Quality and Safety, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Hosp Med. 2023 Jun;18(6):502-508. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13104. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
While pharmacologic prophylaxis has benefits for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention in high-risk patients, unnecessary use carries potential harm, including bleeding, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and patient discomfort, and should be avoided in low-risk patients. While many quality improvement initiatives aim to reduce underuse, successful models on reducing overuse are sparse in the literature.
We aimed to create a quality improvement initiative to reduce overuse of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis.
DESIGNS, SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: A quality improvement initiative was implemented across 11 safety net hospitals in New York City.
The first electronic health record (EHR) intervention consisted of a VTE order panel that facilitated risk assessment and recommended VTE prophylaxis for high-risk patients only. The second EHR intervention used a best practice advisory that alerted clinicians when prophylaxis was ordered for a patient previously deemed "low risk." Prescribing rates were compared through a three-segment interrupted time series linear regression design.
Compared to the preintervention period, the first intervention did not change the rate of total pharmacologic prophylaxis immediately after implementation (1.7% relative change, p = .38) or over time (slope difference of 0.20 orders per 1000 patient days, p = .08). Compared to the first intervention period, the second intervention led to an immediate 4.5% reduction in total pharmacologic prophylaxis (p = .04) but increased thereafter (slope difference of 0.24, p = .03) such that weekly rates at the end of the study were similar to rates prior to the second intervention.
虽然药物预防在高危患者中具有预防静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的作用,但不必要的使用会带来潜在的危害,包括出血、肝素诱导的血小板减少症和患者不适,因此应避免在低危患者中使用。虽然许多质量改进举措旨在减少药物预防的使用不足,但在文献中成功减少过度使用的模式却很少。
我们旨在创建一项质量改进举措,以减少药物性 VTE 预防的过度使用。
设计、地点和参与者:在纽约市的 11 家社区医院实施了一项质量改进举措。
第一个电子病历(EHR)干预措施包括一个 VTE 医嘱面板,该面板便于进行风险评估,仅为高危患者推荐 VTE 预防。第二个 EHR 干预措施使用了最佳实践咨询,当为之前被认为“低风险”的患者开具预防药物时会向临床医生发出警报。通过三段式中断时间序列线性回归设计比较了处方率。
与干预前相比,第一项干预措施在实施后立即(相对变化 1.7%,p=0.38)或随时间推移(每 1000 个患者天相差 0.20 个预防医嘱,p=0.08)并未改变总药物预防的使用率。与第一项干预期相比,第二项干预措施导致总药物预防立即减少了 4.5%(p=0.04),但此后又增加了(斜率差异为 0.24,p=0.03),以至于研究结束时的每周使用率与第二项干预之前的使用率相似。