• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考虑在华盛顿特区母婴保健中实施社会风险因素筛查和转介的因素:一项定性研究。

Considerations in implementation of social risk factor screening and referral in maternal and infant care in Washington, DC: A qualitative study.

机构信息

Medstar Health Research Institute, Healthcare Delivery Research, Washington, DC, United States of America.

Department of Psychiatry, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Apr 13;18(4):e0283815. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283815. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0283815
PMID:37053233
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10101493/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The District of Columbia (DC) has striking disparities in maternal and infant outcomes comparing Black to White women and babies. Social determinants of health (SDoH) are widely recognized as a significant contributor to these disparities in health outcomes. Screening for social risk factors and referral for appropriate services is a critical step in addressing social needs and reducing outcome disparities.

METHODS

We conducted interviews among employees (n = 18) and patients (n = 9) across three diverse, urban clinics within a healthcare system and one community-based organization involved in a five-year initiative to reduce maternal and infant disparities in DC. Interviews were guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to understand current processes and organizational factors that contributed to or impeded delivery of social risk factor screening and referral for indicated needs.

RESULTS

We found that current processes for social risk factor screening and referral differed between and within clinics depending on the patient population. Key facilitators of successful screening included a supportive organizational culture and adaptability of more patient-centered screening processes. Key barriers to delivery included high patient volume and limited electronic health record capabilities to record results and track the status of internal and community referrals. Areas identified for improvement included additional social risk factor assessment training for new providers, patient-centered approaches to screening, improved tracking processes, and facilitation of connections to social services within clinical settings.

CONCLUSION

Despite proliferation of social risk factor screeners and recognition of their importance within health care settings, few studies detail implementation processes for social risk factor screening and referrals. Future studies should test implementation strategies for screening and referral services to address identified barriers to implementation.

摘要

背景

与白人女性和婴儿相比,哥伦比亚特区(DC)在母婴结局方面存在显著的黑人和白人差异。健康的社会决定因素(SDoH)被广泛认为是造成这些健康结果差异的重要因素。对社会风险因素进行筛查并为适当的服务提供转介是解决社会需求和减少结果差异的关键步骤。

方法

我们在医疗保健系统内的三家不同的城市诊所和一家参与减少 DC 母婴差异的五年倡议的社区组织中,对员工(n=18)和患者(n=9)进行了访谈。访谈以实施研究综合框架为指导,以了解当前的流程和组织因素,这些因素有助于或阻碍社会风险因素筛查和转介以满足指示性需求。

结果

我们发现,根据患者人群的不同,诊所之间和内部的社会风险因素筛查和转介流程存在差异。成功筛查的关键促进因素包括支持性的组织文化和更以患者为中心的筛查流程的适应性。交付的关键障碍包括高患者量和记录结果和跟踪内部和社区转介状态的电子健康记录能力有限。需要改进的领域包括为新提供者提供更多的社会风险因素评估培训、以患者为中心的筛查方法、改进的跟踪流程以及在临床环境中促进与社会服务的联系。

结论

尽管社会风险因素筛查器大量涌现,并在医疗保健环境中认识到其重要性,但很少有研究详细描述社会风险因素筛查和转介的实施过程。未来的研究应该测试筛查和转介服务的实施策略,以解决实施过程中的障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edaa/10101493/1ab6bd2ebcbe/pone.0283815.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edaa/10101493/1ab6bd2ebcbe/pone.0283815.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edaa/10101493/1ab6bd2ebcbe/pone.0283815.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Considerations in implementation of social risk factor screening and referral in maternal and infant care in Washington, DC: A qualitative study.考虑在华盛顿特区母婴保健中实施社会风险因素筛查和转介的因素:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 13;18(4):e0283815. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283815. eCollection 2023.
2
Social needs screening and referral in pediatric primary care clinics: a multiple case study.儿科初级保健诊所中的社会需求筛查和转介:多案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 17;22(1):1369. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08692-x.
3
Provider and Staff Feedback on Screening for Social and Behavioral Determinants of Health for Pediatric Patients.医疗服务提供者和工作人员对儿科患者健康的社会和行为决定因素筛查的反馈
J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 May-Jun;32(3):297-306. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.03.180276.
4
Multi-stakeholder perspectives on the implementation of a clinic-based food referral program for patients with chronic conditions: a qualitative examination.多利益相关方视角下的基于诊所的慢性病患者食物转介计划实施情况:定性研究。
Transl Behav Med. 2022 Oct 7;12(9):927-934. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac027.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Assessment and Documentation of Social Determinants of Health Among Health Care Providers: Qualitative Study.医疗保健提供者对健康的社会决定因素的评估与记录:定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Jul 3;7:e47461. doi: 10.2196/47461.
7
Universal screening for social determinants of health in pediatric sickle cell disease: A quality-improvement initiative.儿童镰状细胞病中社会决定因素健康的普遍筛查:一项质量改进计划。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2020 Jan;67(1):e28006. doi: 10.1002/pbc.28006. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Contextual Factors Relevant to Implementing Social Risk Factor Screening and Referrals in Cancer Survivorship: A Qualitative Study.与癌症生存者社会风险因素筛查和转介实施相关的背景因素:一项定性研究。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2024 Apr 4;21:E22. doi: 10.5888/pcd21.230352.
10
Implementing an EHR-based Screening and Referral System to Address Social Determinants of Health in Primary Care.实施基于电子健康记录的筛查和转介系统,以解决初级保健中的健康社会决定因素。
Med Care. 2019 Jun;57 Suppl 6 Suppl 2:S133-S139. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001029.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients' perspectives about sharing information with providers on social needs during pregnancy: a qualitative study.患者对孕期与医护人员分享社会需求信息的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 21;25(1):737. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12666-0.
2
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
3
WIC staff and healthcare professional perceptions of an EHR intervention to facilitate referrals to and improve communication and coordination with WIC: A qualitative study.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of Social Needs Screening and Interventions in Clinical Settings on Utilization, Cost, and Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review.临床环境中社会需求筛查与干预对医疗利用、成本及临床结局的有效性:一项系统评价
Health Equity. 2022 Jun 24;6(1):454-475. doi: 10.1089/heq.2022.0010. eCollection 2022.
2
Using Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to investigate facilitators and barriers of implementing alcohol screening and brief intervention among primary care health professionals: a systematic review.运用实施研究综合框架调查初级保健卫生专业人员实施酒精筛查和简短干预的促进因素和障碍:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2021 Nov 20;16(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01170-8.
3
妇女、婴儿和儿童营养补充计划(WIC)工作人员及医疗保健专业人员对电子健康记录干预措施的看法,该措施旨在促进向WIC的转诊并改善与WIC的沟通和协调:一项定性研究
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Feb 26;8(1):e47. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.488. eCollection 2024.
4
Learning in real world practice: Identifying implementation strategies to integrate health-related social needs screening within a large health system.在现实世界实践中学习:确定在大型医疗系统中整合与健康相关的社会需求筛查的实施策略。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Oct 16;7(1):e229. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.652. eCollection 2023.
Screening and Referral Care Delivery Services and Unmet Health-Related Social Needs: A Systematic Review.
筛查和转介护理服务与未满足的健康相关社会需求:系统评价。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2021 Aug 12;18:E78. doi: 10.5888/pcd18.200569.
4
Implementation of Health-Related Social Needs Screening at Michigan Health Centers: A Qualitative Study.密歇根健康中心实施健康相关社会需求筛查:一项定性研究。
Ann Fam Med. 2021 Jul-Aug;19(4):310-317. doi: 10.1370/afm.2690.
5
Trends and Social Inequalities in Maternal Mortality in the United States, 1969-2018.1969 - 2018年美国孕产妇死亡率的趋势及社会不平等现象
Int J MCH AIDS. 2021;10(1):29-42. doi: 10.21106/ijma.444. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
6
Receipt of Social Needs Assistance and Health Center Patient Experience of Care.社会需求援助的接收情况与健康中心患者的就医体验。
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Mar;60(3):e139-e147. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.08.030. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
7
Successes and challenges of implementing a lung cancer screening program in federally qualified health centers: a qualitative analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.在联邦合格健康中心实施肺癌筛查计划的成功与挑战:使用整合实施研究框架的定性分析
Transl Behav Med. 2021 May 25;11(5):1088-1098. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa121.
8
Qualitative program evaluation of social determinants of health screening and referral program.社会决定因素健康筛查和转介计划的定性方案评价。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 1;15(12):e0242964. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242964. eCollection 2020.
9
Design and development of referrals automation, a SMART on FHIR solution to improve patient access to specialty care.转诊自动化的设计与开发,一种基于FHIR的SMART解决方案,以改善患者获得专科护理的机会。
JAMIA Open. 2020 Oct 28;3(3):405-412. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaa036. eCollection 2020 Oct.
10
Social and Structural Determinants of Health Inequities in Maternal Health.孕产妇健康不平等的社会和结构决定因素。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021 Feb;30(2):230-235. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8882. Epub 2020 Nov 12.