Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, United States of America.
Institute of Health Innovations and Outcomes Research, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 1;15(12):e0242964. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242964. eCollection 2020.
Although the integration of social determinants of health (SDH) screening and referral programs in clinical settings has rapidly grown, the voice and experience of participants within SDH programs has not been well understood in program evaluations. To qualitatively evaluate a comprehensive SDH screening and referral program based in an academic primary care setting, we conducted a qualitative analysis of a semi-structured, focus group interview of 7 caregivers. We performed inductive coding representing emerging ideas from each transcript using focus group transcripts from families who participated in the SDH screening and referral program. A thematic model was created describing caregivers' experiences with respect to screening, intake, and referral phases of the program. Caregivers reported satisfaction with structural and process-related components of screening, intake, and referral. They expressed a preference for trained patient navigators over physicians for screening and intake for they were perceived to have time to prioritize caregivers' social needs. Caregivers reported disappointment with legal services screening, intake, and referral, citing lack of timely contact from the legal resource team and prematurity of provided legal resources. Overall, caregivers recommend the program, citing that the program provided social support, an environment where expression is encouraged, motivation to address their own health needs, and a convenient location. Overall, caregivers would recommend the program because they feel socially supported. The use of trained patient navigators appears to be instrumental to the successful implementation of the program in clinics, for navigators can provide caregivers with the appropriate time and personal attention they need to complete the survey and discuss their needs. Streamlining the referral process for evaluation of health-harming needs by the medical legal partnership was highlighted as an area for improvement.
尽管将社会决定因素健康(SDH)筛查和转介计划整合到临床环境中已经迅速发展,但在计划评估中,参与者在 SDH 计划中的声音和经验并没有得到很好的理解。为了定性评估一个基于学术初级保健的综合 SDH 筛查和转介计划,我们对参与 SDH 筛查和转介计划的 7 名照顾者进行了半结构化焦点小组访谈的定性分析。我们使用来自参与 SDH 筛查和转介计划的家庭的焦点小组转录本,对每个转录本进行了代表新出现想法的归纳编码。创建了一个主题模型,描述了照顾者在计划的筛查、摄入和转介阶段的经验。照顾者对筛查、摄入和转介的结构和过程相关部分表示满意。他们表示,他们更喜欢经过培训的患者导航员而不是医生进行筛查和摄入,因为他们认为导航员有时间优先考虑照顾者的社会需求。照顾者对法律服务的筛查、摄入和转介表示失望,称缺乏法律资源团队的及时联系,并对提供的法律资源过早表示不满。总的来说,照顾者推荐该计划,称该计划提供了社会支持、鼓励表达的环境、解决自身健康需求的动力和便利的位置。总的来说,照顾者会推荐该计划,因为他们感到受到社会的支持。培训过的患者导航员的使用似乎对该计划在诊所的成功实施至关重要,因为导航员可以为照顾者提供他们完成调查和讨论需求所需的适当时间和个人关注。简化医疗法律伙伴关系评估健康危害需求的转介流程是一个需要改进的领域。