• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共同设计并试点测试一份信息图,以支持患者/家属完成REMAP-CAP同意过程:一项混合方法研究方案

Co-designing and pilot testing an infographic to support patients/families through the REMAP-CAP consent process: a mixed-methods study protocol.

作者信息

O'Grady Heather K, Bhimani Zahra, Dalziel Sandra, Dolanjski Barbara, Sandhu Gyan, Santos Marlene, Smith Kathy, Murthy Srinivas, Marshall John C, Kho Michelle E

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

St. Michael's Hospital Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023 Apr 13;9(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01290-6.

DOI:10.1186/s40814-023-01290-6
PMID:37055859
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10098229/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Informed consent is critical to the ethical conduct of clinical research and requires understanding of a trial including its purpose, process, potential risks and benefits, and alternatives to participation. This can be challenging for complex trials, such as platform trials, and in high-stress environments, such as the intensive care unit (ICU). REMAP-CAP (randomized, embedded, multifactorial, adaptive platform trial for community-acquired pneumonia) is a platform trial which studies treatments for ICU patients with community-acquired pneumonia, including COVID-19. Patient/family partners (PFP) identified challenges during the REMAP-CAP consent process.

METHODS

This is a patient-centred co-design study to refine and test an infographic to supplement current REMAP-CAP consent documents. Infographic prototypes were developed by patients, substitute decision-makers (SDMs), and researchers with lived experience in the ICU or with ICU research. We will apply a two-phase exploratory sequential, mixed-methods research design. In phase 1, we will conduct focus groups with ICU patients, SDMs, and research coordinators (RCs). We will use inductive content analysis to inform infographic refinement, to be pilot tested in phase 2. Phase 2 is a prospective study within a trial (SWAT) at ≤ 5 REMAP-CAP sites. We will collect self-reported data from patients/SDMs and RCs. The primary outcome is feasibility (eligible consent encounters, receipt of infographic, consent to follow-up, completion of follow-up surveys). Data will be integrated to understand if/how quantitative results build upon the qualitatively informed infographic.

DISCUSSION

Phase 1 results will be used to co-design an infographic, directly informed by the perspectives of patients, SDMs, and RCs involved in ICU research consent discussions. Results from phase 2 will determine the feasibility of infographic implementation in REMAP-CAP consent encounters. These feasibility data will inform a larger SWAT to evaluate our consent infographic. If successful, use of a co-designed infographic to support REMAP-CAP consent documents may improve the experience of consent for patients, SDMs, and RCs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The Northern Ireland Hub for Trials Methodology Research SWAT Repository (SWAT no. 176).

摘要

背景

知情同意对于临床研究的伦理行为至关重要,需要受试者理解一项试验,包括其目的、过程、潜在风险和益处以及参与试验的替代方案。对于复杂的试验,如平台试验,以及在高压力环境中,如重症监护病房(ICU),这可能具有挑战性。REMAP-CAP(社区获得性肺炎随机、嵌入式、多因素、适应性平台试验)是一项平台试验,研究针对包括新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)在内的社区获得性肺炎ICU患者的治疗方法。患者/家属合作伙伴(PFP)在REMAP-CAP的知情同意过程中发现了一些挑战。

方法

这是一项以患者为中心的协同设计研究,旨在完善和测试一份信息图表,以补充当前的REMAP-CAP知情同意文件。信息图表原型由患者、替代决策者(SDM)以及有ICU实际经验或ICU研究经验的研究人员共同开发。我们将采用两阶段探索性序列混合方法研究设计。在第1阶段,我们将对ICU患者、SDM和研究协调员(RC)进行焦点小组访谈。我们将使用归纳性内容分析为信息图表的完善提供依据,并在第2阶段进行预试验。第2阶段是在≤5个REMAP-CAP试验点进行的试验内前瞻性研究(SWAT)。我们将收集患者/SDM和RC的自我报告数据。主要结局是可行性(符合条件的知情同意接触、收到信息图表、同意随访、完成随访调查)。将整合数据以了解定量结果是否以及如何基于定性信息图表得出。

讨论

第1阶段的结果将用于协同设计一份信息图表,该图表直接基于参与ICU研究知情同意讨论的患者、SDM和RC的观点。第2阶段的结果将确定在REMAP-CAP知情同意接触中实施信息图表的可行性。这些可行性数据将为一项更大规模的SWAT提供信息,以评估我们的知情同意信息图表。如果成功,使用协同设计的信息图表来支持REMAP-CAP知情同意文件可能会改善患者、SDM和RC的知情同意体验。

试验注册

北爱尔兰试验方法研究中心SWAT储存库(SWAT编号176)。

相似文献

1
Co-designing and pilot testing an infographic to support patients/families through the REMAP-CAP consent process: a mixed-methods study protocol.共同设计并试点测试一份信息图,以支持患者/家属完成REMAP-CAP同意过程:一项混合方法研究方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023 Apr 13;9(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01290-6.
2
Feasibility, effectiveness and costs of a decision support intervention for consultees and legal representatives of adults lacking capacity to consent (CONSULT): protocol for a randomised Study Within a Trial.一项针对缺乏同意能力的成年人的顾问和法定代表的决策支持干预措施的可行性、有效性和成本(CONSULT):一项随机研究内试验的方案。
Trials. 2022 Nov 24;23(1):957. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06887-5.
3
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.
4
An enhanced participant information leaflet and multimedia intervention to improve the quality of informed consent to a randomised clinical trial enrolling people living with HIV and obesity: a protocol for a Study Within A Trial (SWAT).一项增强版的知情同意书和多媒体干预措施,以提高招募肥胖的 HIV 感染者参与随机临床试验的知情同意书质量:一项嵌套式临床试验研究(SWAT)的方案。
Trials. 2022 Jan 17;23(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05979-y.
5
Is there a role for physician involvement in introducing research to surrogate decision makers in the intensive care unit? (The Approach trial: a pilot mixed methods study).医生在 ICU 中向替代决策人介绍研究是否有作用?(Approach 试验:一项试点混合方法研究)。
Intensive Care Med. 2015 Jan;41(1):58-67. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3558-3. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Exploring the experiences of substitute decision-makers with an exception to consent in a paediatric resuscitation randomised controlled trial: study protocol for a qualitative research study.探讨在儿科复苏随机对照试验中,对同意的例外情况下替代决策人的体验:一项定性研究的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 13;6(9):e012931. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012931.
8
Implementation of the Randomized Embedded Multifactorial Adaptive Platform for COVID-19 (REMAP-COVID) trial in a US health system-lessons learned and recommendations.在美国医疗体系中实施 COVID-19 随机嵌入式多因素适应性平台试验(REMAP-COVID):经验教训和建议。
Trials. 2021 Jan 28;22(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04997-6.
9
Why participation in an international clinical trial platform matters during a pandemic? Launching REMAP-CAP in Japan.为什么在大流行期间参与国际临床试验平台很重要?在日本启动REMAP-CAP。
J Intensive Care. 2021 Apr 14;9(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40560-021-00547-7.
10
Recruitment interventions for trials involving adults lacking capacity to consent: methodological and ethical considerations for designing Studies Within a Trial (SWATs).涉及无同意能力成年人的试验的招募干预措施:在试验内研究 (SWAT) 中进行研究的方法学和伦理学考虑。
Trials. 2022 Sep 6;23(1):756. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06705-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Co-designing and pilot-testing an infographic to support the consent process in an adaptive platform trial for adults in ICU with community-acquired pneumonia or COVID-19: a mixed methods study within a trial (SWAT).共同设计并进行信息图表的预试验,以支持针对患有社区获得性肺炎或新冠肺炎的成人重症监护病房患者的适应性平台试验中的同意过程:一项试验中的混合方法研究(SWAT)
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Apr 25;11(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00705-3.
2
ICU Care Team's Perception of Clinical Research in the ICU: A Cross-Sectional Study.重症监护病房护理团队对重症监护病房临床研究的认知:一项横断面研究。
Crit Care Explor. 2024 Apr 1;6(4):e1072. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001072. eCollection 2024 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Randomized comparison of two interventions to enhance understanding during the informed consent process for research.随机比较两种干预措施,以增强研究知情同意过程中的理解。
Clin Trials. 2021 Aug;18(4):466-476. doi: 10.1177/17407745211009529. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
2
Adaptive platform trials using multi-arm, multi-stage protocols: getting fast answers in pandemic settings.使用多臂、多阶段方案的适应性平台试验:在大流行背景下快速得出答案。
F1000Res. 2020 Sep 9;9:1109. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.26253.2. eCollection 2020.
3
Are you really doing 'codesign'? Critical reflections when working with vulnerable populations.
你真的在做“共同设计”吗?在与弱势群体合作时的批判性反思。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 3;10(11):e038339. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038339.
4
Effect of Hydrocortisone on Mortality and Organ Support in Patients With Severe COVID-19: The REMAP-CAP COVID-19 Corticosteroid Domain Randomized Clinical Trial.羟考酮治疗对严重 COVID-19 患者死亡率和器官支持的影响:REMAP-CAP COVID-19 皮质类固醇随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2020 Oct 6;324(13):1317-1329. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.17022.
5
An overview of platform trials with a checklist for clinical readers.平台试验概述及临床读者清单
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Sep;125:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.04.025. Epub 2020 May 13.
6
Improving the reporting of health research involving design: a proposed guideline.改进涉及设计的健康研究报告:一项拟议的指南。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Feb 16;5(2):e002248. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002248. eCollection 2020.
7
A guide to the reporting of protocols of pilot and feasibility trials.试点试验和可行性试验方案报告指南。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019 Feb 28;5:37. doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0423-8. eCollection 2019.
8
Codesigning health and other public services with vulnerable and disadvantaged populations: Insights from an international collaboration.与弱势和处境不利人群共同设计卫生和其他公共服务:国际合作的见解。
Health Expect. 2019 Jun;22(3):284-297. doi: 10.1111/hex.12864. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
9
Trial Forge Guidance 1: what is a Study Within A Trial (SWAT)?试验构建指南1:试验中的研究(SWAT)是什么?
Trials. 2018 Feb 23;19(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2535-5.
10
Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report.心理学中定性原始研究、定性元分析研究和混合方法研究的期刊文章报告标准:APA 出版和传播委员会工作组报告。
Am Psychol. 2018 Jan;73(1):26-46. doi: 10.1037/amp0000151.