Seervi Manoj Kumar, Jain Surendra, Purohit Devendra Kumar, Meena Ugan Singh
Department of Neurosurgery, Sawai Man Singh (SMS) Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Asian J Neurosurg. 2023 Mar 27;18(1):91-100. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1761238. eCollection 2023 Mar.
After anterior cervical corpectomy expandable cage were used with or without using anterior cervical plate for structural support are being preferred over autologous bone graft and other types of cages. Nowadays, the preferable type of cages and application of anterior cervical plate remain a debatable topic with studies giving divergent results. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of expandable cages used alone or expandable cage used with anterior cervical plate following anterior cervical corpectomy. This study was conducted on 100 patients from January 2019 to December 2021 and all patients were undergone anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion and divided in two groups with expandable cage only (Group A) and expandable cage with anterior cervical plate (Group B). Various long-term benefits and radiological outcomes were studied in both groups. In this study, 100 patients were included and all patients underwent corpectomy followed by insertion of expandable cage alone or with anterior cervical plate. There was an improvement in C2-C7 Cobb's angle in group B was significantly higher than group A ( < 0.05) and decrease in Nurick's scale score in group B was significantly higher than group A ( < 0.05). The outcomes were measured with fusion rate (94%), subsidence rate (15%) and change in C2-C7 Cobb's angle was 4 degrees in this study. Expandable cage with or without anterior cervical plate was used after anterior cervical corpectomy for various cervical pathological conditions. In this study, we conclude the long-term benefits and radiological outcomes of two groups as expandable cage was used alone or with additional application of anterior cervical plate. In this study, the results were more in favor of additional application of anterior cervical plate as compared with expandable cage alone and more studies were required in future for more established long-term benefits and drawbacks.
在颈椎前路椎体次全切除术后,可扩张椎间融合器无论是否使用颈椎前路钢板进行结构支撑,都比自体骨移植和其他类型的椎间融合器更受青睐。如今,椎间融合器的优选类型以及颈椎前路钢板的应用仍是一个有争议的话题,各项研究给出了不同的结果。本研究的目的是评估颈椎前路椎体次全切除术后单独使用可扩张椎间融合器或联合颈椎前路钢板使用可扩张椎间融合器的疗效。
本研究对2019年1月至2021年12月期间的100例患者进行,所有患者均接受了颈椎前路椎体次全切除及融合术,并分为两组,一组仅使用可扩张椎间融合器(A组),另一组使用可扩张椎间融合器并联合颈椎前路钢板(B组)。对两组患者的各种长期益处和影像学结果进行了研究。
在本研究中,纳入了100例患者,所有患者均接受了椎体次全切除术,随后单独或联合颈椎前路钢板植入可扩张椎间融合器。B组C2-C7 Cobb角的改善明显高于A组( < 0.05),B组Nurick分级评分的降低明显高于A组( < 0.05)。本研究中通过融合率(94%)、下沉率(15%)来衡量结果,C2-C7 Cobb角变化为4°。
颈椎前路椎体次全切除术后,无论是否使用颈椎前路钢板,均可使用可扩张椎间融合器治疗各种颈椎病理状况。在本研究中,我们总结了单独使用可扩张椎间融合器或额外应用颈椎前路钢板时两组的长期益处和影像学结果。在本研究中,与单独使用可扩张椎间融合器相比,结果更支持额外应用颈椎前路钢板,未来还需要更多研究以更明确长期的益处和弊端。