School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
Med Decis Making. 2023 May;43(4):498-507. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231166009. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
General practitioners (GPs) provide the most antidepressant prescriptions and psychologist referrals in Australia, yet little is known about how they decide between treatments for depressive symptoms.
This study examined the decision cues that GPs use when deciding how to treat depressive symptoms and the meaning they attribute to these associations.
Structured interviews were conducted with 16 Australian GPs in a "think-aloud" verbal protocol analysis format. The transcripts were analyzed using content coding and thematic analysis, informed by the dual processes model of decision making.
Participants associated prescribing antidepressants with severe depressive symptoms, and psychologist referrals were the preferred initial treatment provided patients were willing to engage. Four main themes emerged from the thematic analysis: 1) psychologist as default, 2) the risk is just too high, 3) medication as supplement, and 4) drivers of antidepressants. Contrary to previous findings, participants identified a strong heuristic association between depressive symptoms and psychologist referral. Antidepressant prescription was associated with severe symptoms, higher risk, and a cluster of cues that lead them away from psychologist referral.
Participants demonstrated an oversensitivity to depressive symptom severity, associating psychologist referrals with subclinical depressive symptoms, and starting antidepressants for suicidal ideation and significant functional decline.
Psychologist referrals were the default preference for GPs when treating depressive symptoms, whereas antidepressants were reserved for patients with elevated risk from severe depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation.Participants' conceptualization of depression severity was oversensitive compared with treatment guidelines.Contrary to treatment guidelines, GPs in this study demonstrated their discomfort for referring patients with suicidal ideation to a psychologist without initiating antidepressants.GPs should consider whether patients within their mild to moderate assessment range can be treated exclusively with more cost-effective means than psychological therapy such as e-mental health programs, guided self-help, and lifestyle changes alone.
在澳大利亚,全科医生(GP)开出的抗抑郁药处方和转介心理医生最多,但人们对他们如何在治疗抑郁症状的方法之间做出选择知之甚少。
本研究考察了全科医生在决定如何治疗抑郁症状时使用的决策线索,以及他们对这些关联的解释。
采用“出声思考”的口头报告分析格式,对 16 名澳大利亚全科医生进行了结构式访谈。根据决策的双重过程模型,对转录本进行了内容编码和主题分析。
参与者将开抗抑郁药与严重抑郁症状联系起来,并且如果患者愿意参与,那么转介心理医生是首选的初始治疗方法。主题分析中出现了四个主要主题:1)心理医生是默认选择,2)风险太高,3)药物是补充,4)抗抑郁药的驱动因素。与之前的研究结果相反,参与者发现抑郁症状和转介心理医生之间存在强烈的启发式关联。抗抑郁药的处方与严重症状、更高的风险以及一系列导致他们避免转介心理医生的线索有关。
参与者表现出对抑郁症状严重程度的过度敏感,将心理医生的转介与亚临床抑郁症状联系起来,并在出现自杀意念和严重功能下降时开始使用抗抑郁药。
在治疗抑郁症状时,心理医生转介是全科医生的默认首选,而抗抑郁药则保留给有严重抑郁症状和自杀意念风险升高的患者。与治疗指南相比,参与者对抑郁严重程度的概念化过于敏感。与治疗指南相反,本研究中的全科医生表现出他们在没有开始抗抑郁药的情况下,将有自杀意念的患者转介给心理医生时的不适。全科医生应考虑,他们的轻度至中度评估范围内的患者是否可以仅通过比心理治疗更具成本效益的方法(如电子心理健康计划、指导自助和生活方式改变)来治疗,而无需使用抗抑郁药。