Suppr超能文献

足跟与墙面距离变化时进行靠墙深蹲和球上深蹲动作期间的髌股关节负荷

Patellofemoral Joint Loading during the Performance of the Wall Squat and Ball Squat with Heel-to-Wall-Distance Variations.

作者信息

Escamilla Rafael F, Zheng Naiquan, Macleod Toran D, Imamura Rodney, Wilk Kevin E, Wang Shangcheng, Yamashiro Kyle, Escamilla Isabella M, Fleisig Glenn S

机构信息

The Center for Biomedical Engineering and Science, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Science, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, NC.

Department of Physical Therapy, California State University, Sacramento, CA.

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2023 Sep 1;55(9):1592-1600. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003185. Epub 2023 Apr 14.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Although bodyweight wall and ball squats are commonly used during patellofemoral rehabilitation, patellofemoral loading while performing these exercises is unknown, which makes it difficult for clinicians to know how to use these exercises in progressing a patient with patellofemoral pathology. Therefore, the purpose was to quantify patellofemoral force and stress between two bodyweight squat variations (ball squat vs wall squat) and between two heel-to-wall-distance (HTWD) variations (long HTWD vs short HTWD).

METHODS

Sixteen participants performed a dynamic ball squat and wall squat with long HTWD and short HTWD. Ground reaction force and kinematic data were used to measure resultant knee force and torque from inverse dynamics, whereas electromyographic data were used in a knee muscle model to predict resultant knee force and torque, and subsequently, all these data were inputted into a biomechanical computer optimization model to output patellofemoral joint force and stress at select knee angles. A repeated-measures two- and three-way ANOVA ( P < 0.01) was used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Collapsed across long HTWD and short HTWD, patellofemoral joint force and stress were greater in ball squat than wall squat at 30° ( P = 0.009), 40° ( P = 0.008), 90° ( P = 0.003), and 100° ( P = 0.005) knee angles during the squat descent, and greater in wall squat than ball squat at 100° ( P < 0.001), 90° ( P < 0.001), 80° ( P = 0.004), and 70° ( P = 0.009) knee angles during squat ascent. Collapsed across ball and wall squats, patellofemoral joint force and stress were greater with a short HTWD than a long HTWD at 100° ( P = 0.007) and 90° ( P = 0.008) knee angles during squat ascent.

CONCLUSIONS

Patellofemoral joint loading changed according to both squat type and HTWD variations. These differences occurred in part due to differences in forces the wall or ball exerted on the trunk, including friction forces. Overall, patellofemoral force and stress were greater performing the bodyweight wall squat compared with the bodyweight ball squat. Moreover, squatting with short HTWD produced anterior knee displacement beyond the toes at higher knee angles, resulting in greater patellofemoral force and stress compared with squatting with long HTWD.

摘要

引言

尽管体重支撑的靠墙深蹲和球上深蹲在髌股关节康复过程中常用,但进行这些练习时的髌股关节负荷尚不清楚,这使得临床医生难以知晓如何运用这些练习来促进患有髌股关节病变的患者康复。因此,本研究旨在量化两种体重支撑深蹲变式(球上深蹲与靠墙深蹲)以及两种足跟到墙距离(HTWD)变式(长HTWD与短HTWD)之间的髌股关节力和应力。

方法

16名参与者分别进行了长HTWD和短HTWD的动态球上深蹲与靠墙深蹲。地面反作用力和运动学数据用于通过逆动力学测量合成膝关节力和扭矩,而肌电图数据则用于膝关节肌肉模型以预测合成膝关节力和扭矩,随后,所有这些数据被输入到生物力学计算机优化模型中,以输出特定膝关节角度下的髌股关节力和应力。采用重复测量的双向和三向方差分析(P < 0.01)进行统计分析。

结果

综合长HTWD和短HTWD来看,在深蹲下降过程中,在30°(P = 0.009)、40°(P = 0.008)、90°(P = 0.003)和100°(P = 0.005)膝关节角度时,球上深蹲的髌股关节力和应力大于靠墙深蹲;在深蹲上升过程中,在100°(P < 0.001)、90°(P < 0.001)、80°(P = 0.004)和70°(P = 0.009)膝关节角度时,靠墙深蹲的髌股关节力和应力大于球上深蹲。综合球上深蹲和靠墙深蹲来看,在深蹲上升过程中,在100°(P = 0.007)和90°(P = 0.008)膝关节角度时,短HTWD的髌股关节力和应力大于长HTWD。

结论

髌股关节负荷根据深蹲类型和HTWD变式而变化。这些差异部分是由于墙壁或球对躯干施加的力的差异,包括摩擦力。总体而言,与体重支撑的球上深蹲相比,体重支撑的靠墙深蹲的髌股关节力和应力更大。此外,短HTWD深蹲在更高膝关节角度时会使膝关节前部位移超出脚趾,导致与长HTWD深蹲相比髌股关节力和应力更大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验