Hale Rena, Green Joshua, Hausselle Jerome, Saxby David, Gonzalez Roger V
The University of Texas at El Paso, College of Engineering, Department of Metallurgical, Materials and Biomedical Engineering, 500 W. University Ave., El Paso, TX 79968, United States; Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States.
The University of Texas at El Paso, College of Engineering, Department of Metallurgical, Materials and Biomedical Engineering, 500 W. University Ave., El Paso, TX 79968, United States.
J Biomech. 2018 Oct 5;79:21-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
Squats are a common lower extremity task used in strength and conditioning, balance training, and rehabilitation. It is important to understand how slight alterations in lower extremity kinematics during a squat affect the internal joint loading of the knee. This study directly quantified tibiofemoral contact throughout the in vitro simulation of a bodyweight back squat performed two ways: a heel squat (knees in line with toes) and a toe squat (knees anterior to the toes) at peak knee flexion. Three cadaveric right lower extremities were instrumented and positioned into the University of Texas Joint Load Simulator. Kinematics, kinetics, and predicted muscle forces from a 20-year-old athletic male performing the two back squats were used as inputs for the in vitro simulations. The quantified tibiofemoral contact area, peak pressure, net force, and center of pressure location were significantly different between squat types (p > 0.05). Net contact area on the tibial plateau at peak knee flexion was significantly larger in the heel versus toe squat (599 ± 80 mm vs. 469 ± 125 mm; p < 0.05). Peak lateral pressure was significantly higher in the heel versus toe squat (2.73 ± 0.54 MPa vs. 0.87 ± 0.56 MPa; p < 0.05). Results suggest the heel squat generates an even load distribution, which is less likely to affect joint degeneration. Future in vitro simulations should quantify the effects lower extremity kinematics, kinetics, and individual muscle forces have on tibiofemoral contact parameters during common athletic tasks.
深蹲是力量与体能训练、平衡训练及康复训练中常见的下肢训练动作。了解深蹲过程中下肢运动学的细微变化如何影响膝关节的内部关节负荷非常重要。本研究通过两种方式对体重深蹲的体外模拟过程中的胫股接触进行了直接量化:足跟深蹲(膝盖与脚趾对齐)和脚尖深蹲(膝盖位于脚趾前方),均在膝关节屈曲峰值时进行。三只尸体右下肢被安装仪器并放置在德克萨斯大学关节负荷模拟器中。一名20岁男性运动员进行两种深蹲时的运动学、动力学及预测肌肉力量被用作体外模拟的输入数据。两种深蹲类型之间的量化胫股接触面积、峰值压力、净力及压力中心位置存在显著差异(p > 0.05)。足跟深蹲时膝关节屈曲峰值处胫骨平台的净接触面积显著大于脚尖深蹲(599 ± 80 mm对469 ± 125 mm;p < 0.05)。足跟深蹲时的峰值外侧压力显著高于脚尖深蹲(2.73 ± 0.54 MPa对0.87 ± 0.56 MPa;p < 0.05)。结果表明足跟深蹲产生的负荷分布更均匀,不太可能影响关节退变。未来的体外模拟应量化常见体育任务中下肢运动学、动力学及个体肌肉力量对胫股接触参数的影响。