• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

报告分析了 COVID-19 大流行期间澳大利亚和波兰与精神药物相关的不良反应。

Reports analysis of psychotropic drugs related adverse reactions in Australia and Poland during the COVID 19 pandemic.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, Poland.

Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, Poland.

出版信息

Biomed Pharmacother. 2023 Jun;162:114681. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.114681. Epub 2023 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.biopha.2023.114681
PMID:37058823
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10080277/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant changes to the global health care system AIMS: It is unknown whether the COVID-19 pandemic influenced the occurrence of adverse drug reactions (ADR) of antidepressive agents, benzodiazepines, and antipsychotics plus mood stabilizers (AaMS). The study was designed in order to compare the incidence of ADR during the COVID-19 pandemic with the period preceding the pandemic in Poland and Australia, different in terms of their COVID-19 prevention strategy.

METHOD

We analysed ADR from the three surveyed pharmacological groups of drugs observed in Poland and Australia in the period prior to, and during the COVID-19 pandemic RESULTS: In Poland, a noticeable increase in the reported ADR of the assessed drug groups was observed during the COVID-19 pandemic. The highest was for antidepressive agents, but the reporting of ADR for benzodiazepines and AaMS drugs also increased significantly. In the case of ADR in Australian patients, the increase in the number of reported ADR for antidepressive agents was modest compared to that seen in Poland, but still noticeable, and there was a significant increase in ADR for benzodiazepines CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact on the incidence of ADR reported among both Polish and Australian patients but the modality of this was different.

摘要

背景

COVID-19 大流行对全球医疗保健系统造成了重大变化。

目的

目前尚不清楚 COVID-19 大流行是否会影响抗抑郁药、苯二氮䓬类药物和抗精神病药+心境稳定剂(AaMS)的不良反应(ADR)的发生。本研究旨在比较 COVID-19 大流行期间与波兰和澳大利亚大流行前时期 ADR 的发生率,这两个国家在 COVID-19 预防策略方面存在差异。

方法

我们分析了波兰和澳大利亚在 COVID-19 大流行之前和期间观察到的三个调查药物组的 ADR。

结果

在波兰,COVID-19 大流行期间报告的评估药物组的 ADR 明显增加。抗抑郁药的报告最多,但苯二氮䓬类药物和 AaMS 药物的 ADR 报告也显著增加。在澳大利亚患者的 ADR 方面,与波兰相比,抗抑郁药报告的 ADR 数量增加幅度适中,但仍引人注目,苯二氮䓬类药物的 ADR 显著增加。

结论

本研究表明,COVID-19 大流行对波兰和澳大利亚患者报告的 ADR 发生率产生了影响,但影响方式不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1be/10080277/fdffff036594/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1be/10080277/2287b52c04ac/ga1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1be/10080277/400b58aff577/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1be/10080277/cc28208807ea/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1be/10080277/fdffff036594/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1be/10080277/2287b52c04ac/ga1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1be/10080277/400b58aff577/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1be/10080277/cc28208807ea/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1be/10080277/fdffff036594/gr3_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Reports analysis of psychotropic drugs related adverse reactions in Australia and Poland during the COVID 19 pandemic.报告分析了 COVID-19 大流行期间澳大利亚和波兰与精神药物相关的不良反应。
Biomed Pharmacother. 2023 Jun;162:114681. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.114681. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
2
Prevalence, characteristics, and reporting of adverse drug reactions in an Australian hospital: a retrospective review of hospital admissions due to adverse drug reactions.澳大利亚一家医院内药物不良反应的发生率、特征及报告情况:一项因药物不良反应而住院的回顾性研究
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2021 Oct;20(10):1267-1274. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2021.1938539. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
3
Psychotropic Drug Prescription in Nursing Homes During the COVID-19 Pandemic.养老机构在 COVID-19 大流行期间的精神药物处方
Drugs Aging. 2022 Jun;39(6):467-475. doi: 10.1007/s40266-022-00948-9. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
4
ADR in Journals: Are They Translated into Regulatory Frameworks?期刊中的药品不良反应:是否被纳入监管框架?
Curr Drug Saf. 2022;17(1):34-39. doi: 10.2174/1574886316666210609115148.
5
Adverse drug reactions in a psychiatric department of tertiary care teaching hospital in India: Analysis of spontaneously reported cases.印度一家三级护理教学医院精神科的药物不良反应:自发报告病例分析。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2015 Oct;17:42-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2015.07.003. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
6
Are non-serious adverse reactions to psychiatric drugs really non-serious?精神科药物的非严重不良反应真的不严重吗?
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2013 Aug;23(6):394-400. doi: 10.1089/cap.2012.0094.
7
Sex Differences in Reported Adverse Drug Reactions to COVID-19 Drugs in a Global Database of Individual Case Safety Reports.在全球个体病例安全报告数据库中 COVID-19 药物不良反应报告的性别差异。
Drug Saf. 2020 Dec;43(12):1309-1314. doi: 10.1007/s40264-020-01000-8. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
8
Sales of "COVID kit" drugs and adverse drug reactions reported by the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency.巴西卫生监管机构报告的“COVID 试剂盒”药物销售和药物不良反应。
Cad Saude Publica. 2022 Jul 25;38(7):e00001022. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XEN001022. eCollection 2022.
9
Monitoring drug safety in Astrakhan, Russia.俄罗斯阿斯特拉罕地区的药物安全监测。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27 Suppl 1:S33-4. doi: 10.3233/JRS-150680.
10
Adverse drug reactions in Colombian patients, 2007-2013: Analysis of population databases.2007 - 2013年哥伦比亚患者的药物不良反应:人口数据库分析
Biomedica. 2016 Mar 3;36(1):59-66. doi: 10.7705/biomedica.v36i1.2781.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety profile of ramelteon from the perspective of physicians and pharmacists: a 20-year real-world pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FAERS database.从医生和药剂师角度看雷美替胺的安全性:基于FAERS数据库的20年真实世界药物警戒分析
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 7;25(1):683. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07127-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants reduce COVID-19 infection: prospects for use.选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)抗抑郁药可降低 COVID-19 感染风险:应用前景。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Oct;78(10):1601-1611. doi: 10.1007/s00228-022-03372-5. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
2
Antidepressants for COVID-19: A systematic review.抗抑郁药治疗 COVID-19:系统评价。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Jun 15;307:108-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.03.059. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
3
Consumption and ocurrence of antidepressants (SSRIs) in pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic, their environmental impact and innovative removal methods: A review.
抗抑郁药(SSRIs)在新冠疫情前后的消费和产生、其环境影响和创新去除方法:综述。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jul 10;829:154656. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154656. Epub 2022 Mar 19.
4
Changes in antidepressant use in Australia: A nationwide analysis (2015-2021).澳大利亚抗抑郁药使用情况的变化:一项全国性分析(2015 - 2021年)
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2023 Jan;57(1):49-57. doi: 10.1177/00048674221079740. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
5
Adjustment disorder, traumatic stress, depression and anxiety in Poland during an early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.波兰在 COVID-19 大流行早期的调整障碍、创伤后应激、抑郁和焦虑。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Jan 26;12(1):1860356. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1860356. eCollection 2021.
6
Safety and efficacy of fluvoxamine in COVID-19 ICU patients: An open label, prospective cohort trial with matched controls.氟伏沙明治疗 COVID-19 重症监护病房患者的安全性和有效性:一项开放标签、前瞻性队列研究,设有匹配对照。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 May;88(5):2065-2073. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15126. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
7
Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic.2020 年 COVID-19 大流行期间 204 个国家和地区的抑郁和焦虑障碍的全球患病率和负担。
Lancet. 2021 Nov 6;398(10312):1700-1712. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02143-7. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
8
Mental health over nine months during the SARS-CoV2 pandemic: Representative cross-sectional survey in twelve waves between April and December 2020 in Austria.SARS-CoV2 大流行期间九个月的心理健康状况:2020 年 4 月至 12 月期间在奥地利进行的 12 波代表性横断面调查。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Jan 1;296:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.08.153. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
9
The Pandemic and the Supply Chain: Gaps in Pharmaceutical Production and Distribution.大流行与供应链:药品生产与分销的差距
Am J Public Health. 2021 Apr;111(4):635-639. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.306138. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
10
Sex and age differences in clinically significant symptoms of depression and anxiety among people in Australia in the first month of COVID-19 restrictions: a national survey.新冠疫情限制措施实施首月澳大利亚人群中抑郁和焦虑的临床显著症状的性别和年龄差异:全国性调查
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 24;10(11):e042696. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042696.