• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无法手术的肝门周围型胆管癌中金属支架与塑料支架的长期疗效:多中心回顾性倾向评分匹配比较。

Long-term efficacy of metal versus plastic stents in inoperable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma; a multicenter retrospective propensity score matched comparison.

机构信息

Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Erasmus University Medical Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

HPB (Oxford). 2023 Jul;25(7):798-806. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.03.011. Epub 2023 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.hpb.2023.03.011
PMID:37059650
Abstract

BACKGROUND

For palliative drainage of inoperable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) uncovered metal stents are preferred over plastic stents. However, there is a lack of data on re-interventions at the long-term. The aim is to evaluate the potential difference in the number of re-interventions in patients surviving at least 6 months.

METHODS

Retrospective study including patients with pCCA who underwent plastic stent placement(s) or had metal stent(s) in situ for at least 6 months. The primary outcome was the number of re-interventions per patient-year. A propensity score matching (1:1) analysis was performed using age, Bismuth classification, reason for inoperability, pathological confirmation, systemic therapy and initial approach (endoscopic vs percutaneous).

RESULTS

Patients in the metal stent group (n = 87) underwent fewer re-interventions compared with the plastic stent group (n = 40) (3.0 vs. 4.7 per patient-year; IRR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.88). When only non-elective re-interventions were included, there was no significant difference (2.1 vs. 2.7; IRR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.08). Results were similar in the propensity score-matched dataset.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that, also in patients with inoperable pCCA who survive at least 6 months, placement of metal stent(s) leads to fewer re-interventions in comparison with plastic stents.

摘要

背景

对于无法手术的肝门周围型胆管癌(pCCA)的姑息性引流,uncovered 金属支架比塑料支架更受欢迎。然而,对于长期随访的再干预数据还很缺乏。本研究旨在评估至少生存 6 个月的患者中,再干预的数量是否存在差异。

方法

本研究回顾性纳入了接受塑料支架置入或原位金属支架置入至少 6 个月的 pCCA 患者。主要研究终点为患者每年的再干预次数。采用倾向评分匹配(1:1)方法,比较年龄、Bismuth 分型、不可切除原因、病理证实、全身治疗和初始治疗方法(内镜下或经皮)对再干预的影响。

结果

金属支架组(n=87)的患者每年的再干预次数明显少于塑料支架组(n=40)(3.0 次 vs. 4.7 次;IRR,0.64;95%CI,0.47 至 0.88)。仅纳入非择期再干预时,两组间差异无统计学意义(2.1 次 vs. 2.7 次;IRR,0.76;95%CI,0.55 至 1.08)。倾向评分匹配数据集的结果相似。

结论

本研究表明,对于至少生存 6 个月的不可切除 pCCA 患者,与塑料支架相比,金属支架置入可减少再干预的次数。

相似文献

1
Long-term efficacy of metal versus plastic stents in inoperable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma; a multicenter retrospective propensity score matched comparison.无法手术的肝门周围型胆管癌中金属支架与塑料支架的长期疗效:多中心回顾性倾向评分匹配比较。
HPB (Oxford). 2023 Jul;25(7):798-806. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.03.011. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
2
Preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage by metal versus plastic stents for resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.术前内镜下经金属与塑料支架胆道引流用于可切除的肝门周围胆管癌。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Apr;99(4):566-576.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.10.041. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
3
Optimum palliation of inoperable hilar cholangiocarcinoma: comparative assessment of the efficacy of plastic and self-expanding metal stents.无法手术切除的肝门部胆管癌的最佳姑息治疗:塑料支架和自膨式金属支架疗效的对比评估。
Dig Dis Sci. 2011 May;56(5):1557-64. doi: 10.1007/s10620-010-1550-5. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
4
Comparison of endoscopic bilateral metal stent drainage with plastic stents in the palliation of unresectable hilar biliary malignant strictures: Large multicenter study.内镜双侧金属支架引流与塑料支架姑息治疗不可切除肝门部恶性胆道狭窄的比较:大型多中心研究。
Dig Endosc. 2021 Jan;33(1):179-189. doi: 10.1111/den.13680. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
5
Endoscopic stenting for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: efficacy of unilateral and bilateral placement of plastic and metal stents in a retrospective review of 480 patients.内镜下胆管支架置入术治疗肝门部胆管癌:回顾性分析 480 例患者中单侧和双侧置入塑料和金属支架的疗效。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2012 Aug 9;12:103. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-12-103.
6
Biliary drainage in hilar and perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: 25-year experience at a tertiary cancer center.肝门和周围型胆管癌的胆汁引流:一家三级癌症中心 25 年的经验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Jun;99(6):938-949.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.12.006. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
7
Efficacy and safety of compound tri-metal stent placement for malignant perihilar biliary obstruction.复合三金属支架置入治疗恶性肝门部胆管梗阻的疗效与安全性
Niger J Clin Pract. 2018 Sep;21(9):1121-1126. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_290_17.
8
The placement of multiple plastic stents still has important roles in candidates for chemotherapy for unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.对于无法切除的肝门周围胆管癌患者,接受化疗的候选人群中,仍有重要作用的是放置多个塑料支架。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2020 Oct;27(10):700-711. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.804. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
9
Biliary Decompression in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma Improves Survival: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.肝门部胆管癌行胆系减压术可改善生存:单中心回顾性分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Feb;64(2):561-569. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5277-z. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
10
Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Stent Implantation for Obstructive Jaundice of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A Prospective Study on Predictors of Stent Patency and Survival in 92 Patients.经皮肝穿刺胆管支架植入术治疗肝门部胆管癌所致梗阻性黄疸:92例患者支架通畅及生存预测因素的前瞻性研究
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016 Jul;27(7):1047-1055.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.02.035. Epub 2016 May 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Response letter to the editor.给编辑的回信。
Gut. 2025 Feb 6;74(3):501. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-331758.