Suppr超能文献

健康男性志愿者群体血浆和尿液药代动力学及磷霉素目标达成概率。

Population plasma and urine pharmacokinetics and the probability of target attainment of fosfomycin in healthy male volunteers.

机构信息

Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Rotterdam Clinical Pharmacometrics Group, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Jun;79(6):775-787. doi: 10.1007/s00228-023-03477-5. Epub 2023 Apr 15.

Abstract

PURPOSE

A population pharmacokinetic model of fosfomycin was developed in healthy volunteers after intravenous administration, and different dosing regimens were evaluated in terms of the probability of target attainment for Escherichia coli using both plasma and urinary pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets.

METHODS

Eight healthy men received fosfomycin as both intermittent 8 g q8h and continuous infusion 1 g/h with a loading dose of 8 g in a crossover study design. Dense sampling was conducted during both regimens. Population pharmacokinetic modelling was performed using NONMEM. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to evaluate the Probability of Target Attainment (PTA) of different dosing regimens using bactericidal (AUC/MIC of 83 and 75%T) and bacteriostatic (AUC/MIC of 25) plasma targets and bacteriostatic (AUC/MIC of 3994) urine target.

RESULTS

A total of 176 plasma and 86 urine samples were available for PK analysis. A two-compartment model with a urine compartment best described the data. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) showed a significant correlation with renal clearance and was implemented in the final model. Simulation results show that the dose of 4 g q8h reached 100% of PTA using bactericidal and bacteriostatic targets for MIC up to 16 mg/L.

CONCLUSION

For the clinical breakpoint of 32 mg/L, the standard dosing regimen (4 g q8h) might not be sufficient to reach the bactericidal target. Higher dosing of 8 g q8h as an intermittent infusion or 0.75 g/h as a continuous infusion might be required. Continuous infusion resulted in better attainment of the %T target than intermittent infusion.

摘要

目的

在健康志愿者中建立磷霉素的群体药代动力学模型,评估不同给药方案的目标达成概率,包括使用血浆和尿药动学/药效学靶值评估大肠埃希菌。

方法

8 名健康男性以交叉设计接受磷霉素间歇 8 g q8h 和连续输注 1 g/h(负荷剂量 8 g)。两种方案均进行密集采样。使用 NONMEM 进行群体药代动力学建模。通过蒙特卡罗模拟评估不同给药方案的达标概率(PTA),使用杀菌(AUC/MIC 为 83%和 75%T)和抑菌(AUC/MIC 为 25)血浆靶值以及抑菌(AUC/MIC 为 3994)尿靶值。

结果

共有 176 份血浆样本和 86 份尿液样本可用于 PK 分析。数据最佳拟合为两室模型加尿室模型。肾小球滤过率(GFR)与肾清除率有显著相关性,被纳入最终模型。模拟结果显示,剂量为 4 g q8h 时,MIC 达 16 mg/L 及以下时,杀菌和抑菌靶值的 PTA 达到 100%。

结论

对于 32 mg/L 的临床折点,标准给药方案(4 g q8h)可能不足以达到杀菌靶值。需要更高剂量的 8 g q8h 间歇输注或 0.75 g/h 连续输注。连续输注比间歇输注更能达到 %T 靶值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b88/10229474/0e7c6e155c47/228_2023_3477_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验