Department of Sociology LMU Munich Konradstr, 680801, Munich, Germany.
Soc Sci Res. 2023 May;112:102804. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2022.102804. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
This article uses a novel experimental approach to measure whether men and women actually differ in their gender role attitudes. Recent research has shown that operationalizing gender role attitudes on a unidimensional scale ranging from "egalitarian" to "traditional" is problematic. Instead, their multidimensionality must to be taken into account. Similarly, an ideal measurement tool should consider that gender norms are applied conditionally, i.e., extensive information on the situational context must be provided. In this article, both preconditions are met by using a multifactorial survey experiment. The vignettes used in the survey experiment contain extensive contextual information on fictional couples' division of paid and unpaid work. In addition, the experimental variation of this information (e.g., the vignette persons' gender, the presence and age of children, and the partners' shares of paid and unpaid work) allows to disentangle the different dimensions that may influence (different) gender role attitudes of men and women. Results show no gender difference in attitudes: On average, men and women have "classical" egalitarian gender role attitudes.
本文采用一种新颖的实验方法来衡量男性和女性在性别角色态度上是否存在差异。最近的研究表明,将性别角色态度在从“平等主义”到“传统”的单一维度上进行操作是有问题的。相反,必须考虑到它们的多维性。同样,理想的测量工具应该考虑到性别规范是有条件适用的,即必须提供大量关于情境背景的信息。在本文中,通过使用多因素调查实验满足了这两个前提条件。调查实验中使用的情景包含了关于虚构夫妻有偿和无偿工作分配的大量情境信息。此外,该信息的实验变化(例如,情景人物的性别、孩子的存在和年龄,以及伴侣有偿和无偿工作的份额)可以分解可能影响(不同)男性和女性性别角色态度的不同维度。结果显示,在态度上没有性别差异:平均而言,男性和女性都持有“经典”的平等主义性别角色态度。