Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Australia; Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition, and Activity (ARENA), University of South Australia, Australia.
Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Australia; Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition, and Activity (ARENA), University of South Australia, Australia. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/_samchalmers.
J Sci Med Sport. 2023 Apr-May;26(4-5):247-252. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2023.03.013. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
Concussion increases injury risk. However, this has not been investigated in junior Australian football and it is unknown whether the location, severity, and mechanism of subsequent injuries differ after concussion vs. non-concussion injury.
Prospective cohort.
1455 elite adolescent male Australian footballers were tracked across seven seasons to determine whether subsequent injury risk was greater after concussion compared to non-concussion index injury using multilevel survival analysis. Mixed-effects logistic regression compared location and mechanism. Mixed-effects Poisson regression compared severity.
Of 1455 athletes, 632 were injured and included in subsequent-injury analysis. There were no differences in injury incidence after a concussion compared to upper- (hazard ratio = 1.0, 0.6 to 1.9, P = 0.892; trivial effect) and lower (hazard ratio = 1.1, 0.6 to 1.9, P = 0.810; trivial effect) index injury, or in location. Subsequent injuries were more likely to be contact-based after a non-concussion injury than concussion (odds ratio = 4.6, 1.3 to 16.0; P = 0.017; large effect). There was no difference in subsequent injury severity after lower- (3.4 ± 3.0 missed matches; incidence rate ratio = 1.4, 0.9 to 2.1; P ≤ 0.117; small effect) and upper-limb injuries (3.4 ± 3.1 missed matches; incidence rate ratio = 1.4, 0.9 to 2.2; P = 0.189; small effect) compared to concussion (2.4 ± 2.0 missed matches).
Subsequent injury risk, severity, and location in junior Australian football are similar following concussion compared to non-concussion index injuries, although contact injuries are less likely.
脑震荡会增加受伤风险。然而,这一点尚未在澳大利亚青少年足球中得到研究,也不清楚脑震荡后与非脑震荡损伤相比,后续损伤的部位、严重程度和机制是否不同。
前瞻性队列研究。
对 1455 名精英青少年男性澳大利亚足球运动员进行了七个赛季的跟踪,以使用多级生存分析确定与非脑震荡指数损伤相比,脑震荡后后续损伤的风险是否更高。混合效应逻辑回归比较了部位和机制。混合效应泊松回归比较了严重程度。
在 1455 名运动员中,有 632 人受伤并纳入后续损伤分析。与上(危险比=1.0,0.6 至 1.9,P=0.892;微小效应)和下(危险比=1.1,0.6 至 1.9,P=0.810;微小效应)指数损伤相比,脑震荡后损伤发生率无差异,部位也无差异。与脑震荡相比,非脑震荡损伤后更有可能发生接触性后续损伤(优势比=4.6,1.3 至 16.0;P=0.017;大效应)。下肢(3.4±3.0 场错过比赛;发生率比=1.4,0.9 至 2.1;P≤0.117;小效应)和上肢(3.4±3.1 场错过比赛;发生率比=1.4,0.9 至 2.2;P=0.189;小效应)损伤后后续损伤严重程度无差异与脑震荡(2.4±2.0 场错过比赛)。
与非脑震荡指数损伤相比,青少年澳大利亚足球中脑震荡后后续损伤的风险、严重程度和部位相似,但接触性损伤较少。