• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同骨条件和骨整合率下短种植体应力分布的三维有限元分析。

Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution on short implants with different bone conditions and osseointegration rates.

机构信息

Graduate School of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.

Department of Engineering Mechanics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2023 Apr 15;23(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02945-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12903-023-02945-9
PMID:37061667
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10105927/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This experiment aimed to investigate the effects of bone conditions and osseointegration rates on the stress distribution of short implants using finite element analysis and also to provide some reference for the application of short implants from a biomechanical prospect.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Anisotropic jaw bone models with three bone conditions and 4.1 × 6 mm implant models were created, and four osseointegration rates were simulated. Stress and strain for the implants and jaws were calculated during vertical or oblique loading.

RESULTS

The cortical bone area around the implant neck was most stressed. The maximum von Mises stress in cortical bone increased with bone deterioration and osseointegration rate, with maximum values of 144.32 MPa and 203.94 MPa for vertical and inclined loading, respectively. The osseointegration rate had the greatest effect on the maximum principal stress in cortical bone of type III bone, with its value increasing by 63.8% at a 100% osseointegration rate versus a 25% osseointegration rate. The maximum and minimum principal stresses under inclined load are 1.3 ~ 1.7 and 1.4 ~ 1.8 times, respectively, those under vertical load. The stress on the jaw bone did not exceed the threshold when the osseointegration rate was ≥ 50% for Type II and 100% for Type III. High strain zones are found in cancellous bone, and the maximum strain increases as the bone condition deteriorate and the rate of osseointegration decreases.

CONCLUSIONS

The maximum stress in the jaw bone increases as the bone condition deteriorates and the osseointegration rate increases. Increased osseointegration rate reduces cancellous bone strain and improves implant stability without exceeding the yield strength of the cortical bone. When the bone condition is good, and the osseointegration ratio is relatively high, 6 mm short implants can be used. In clinical practice, incline loading is an unfavorable loading condition, and axial loading should be used as much as possible.

摘要

目的

本实验旨在通过有限元分析研究不同骨条件和骨整合率对短种植体应力分布的影响,从生物力学角度为短种植体的应用提供参考。

材料与方法

建立了三种骨条件和 4.1×6mm 种植体模型的各向异性颌骨模型,并模拟了四种骨整合率。在垂直或倾斜加载下计算种植体和颌骨的应力和应变。

结果

种植体颈部周围的皮质骨区域受力最大。皮质骨的最大 von Mises 应力随骨恶化和骨整合率的增加而增加,垂直和倾斜加载时的最大值分别为 144.32MPa 和 203.94MPa。骨整合率对 III 型骨皮质骨的最大主应力影响最大,在 100%骨整合率下比 25%骨整合率下增加了 63.8%。倾斜加载时的最大和最小主应力分别是垂直加载时的 1.31.7 倍和 1.41.8 倍。当骨整合率为 II 型≥50%和 III 型 100%时,颌骨上的应力不超过阈值。松质骨中存在高应变区,最大应变随骨条件恶化和骨整合率降低而增加。

结论

随着骨条件恶化和骨整合率增加,颌骨的最大应力增加。增加的骨整合率减少了松质骨的应变,提高了种植体的稳定性,而不会超过皮质骨的屈服强度。在骨条件良好且骨整合率较高的情况下,可以使用 6mm 短种植体。在临床实践中,倾斜加载是一种不利的加载条件,应尽可能使用轴向加载。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da62/10105927/87bfb72b0a85/12903_2023_2945_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da62/10105927/8d974abcc848/12903_2023_2945_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da62/10105927/b0a904cf9da5/12903_2023_2945_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da62/10105927/8dae403a95db/12903_2023_2945_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da62/10105927/5095be42234b/12903_2023_2945_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da62/10105927/54229a9b18ba/12903_2023_2945_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da62/10105927/a58d2088efac/12903_2023_2945_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da62/10105927/16ae28c3dc4a/12903_2023_2945_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da62/10105927/35d917e6f391/12903_2023_2945_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da62/10105927/3c69b20110bd/12903_2023_2945_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da62/10105927/f7a3adddb250/12903_2023_2945_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da62/10105927/2545391cbfd7/12903_2023_2945_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da62/10105927/745585ba6c80/12903_2023_2945_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da62/10105927/8dcc08d6b357/12903_2023_2945_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da62/10105927/87bfb72b0a85/12903_2023_2945_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da62/10105927/8d974abcc848/12903_2023_2945_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da62/10105927/b0a904cf9da5/12903_2023_2945_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da62/10105927/8dae403a95db/12903_2023_2945_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da62/10105927/5095be42234b/12903_2023_2945_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da62/10105927/54229a9b18ba/12903_2023_2945_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da62/10105927/a58d2088efac/12903_2023_2945_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da62/10105927/16ae28c3dc4a/12903_2023_2945_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da62/10105927/35d917e6f391/12903_2023_2945_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da62/10105927/3c69b20110bd/12903_2023_2945_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da62/10105927/f7a3adddb250/12903_2023_2945_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da62/10105927/2545391cbfd7/12903_2023_2945_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da62/10105927/745585ba6c80/12903_2023_2945_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da62/10105927/8dcc08d6b357/12903_2023_2945_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da62/10105927/87bfb72b0a85/12903_2023_2945_Fig14_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution on short implants with different bone conditions and osseointegration rates.不同骨条件和骨整合率下短种植体应力分布的三维有限元分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Apr 15;23(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02945-9.
2
[Different short dental implants on the stress distribution in posterior maxilla: a three-dimensional finite element analysis].[不同短种植体对后上颌骨应力分布的影响:三维有限元分析]
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2014 Nov;49(11):662-6.
3
Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis.种植体直径、植入深度和加载角度对种植体/颌骨系统中应力/应变场的影响:有限元分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Sep-Oct;24(5):877-86.
4
Effect of short implant crown-to-implant ratio on stress distribution in anisotropic bone with different osseointegration rates.短种植体冠-植体比对不同骨整合率各向异性骨中应力分布的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Sep 20;23(1):683. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03379-z.
5
Bone adaptation induced by non-passively fitting implant superstructures: a finite element analysis based on in vivo strain measurements.非被动适配种植体上部结构引起的骨适应性:基于体内应变测量的有限元分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Nov-Dec;26(6):1288-95.
6
Effect of different occlusal materials on peri-implant stress distribution with different osseointegration condition: A finite element analysis.不同骨整合条件下不同咬合材料对种植体周围应力分布的影响:有限元分析。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2024 Jul 1;24(3):292-299. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_424_23.
7
[Three dimensional finite element analysis of biomechanical distribution of dental implants with immediate loading].即刻负重种植体生物力学分布的三维有限元分析
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2011 Apr;29(2):121-4.
8
Finite element analysis of peri-implant bone volume affected by stresses around Morse taper implants: effects of implant positioning to the bone crest.莫氏锥度种植体周围应力对种植体周围骨体积的有限元分析:种植体相对于牙槽嵴顶位置的影响
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2018 Sep;21(12):655-662. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2018.1507025.
9
Influence of different implant designs on replacement of four teeth of the posterior free-end edentulism: Three-dimensional finite element analysis and clinic case validation.不同种植体设计对游离端缺失四颗后牙修复的影响:三维有限元分析及临床病例验证。
Ann Anat. 2023 Aug;249:152111. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2023.152111. Epub 2023 May 27.
10
The effect of implant thread design on stress distribution in anisotropic bone with different osseointegration conditions: a finite element analysis.种植体螺纹设计对不同骨整合条件下各向异性骨应力分布的影响:有限元分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Nov-Dec;30(6):1317-26. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4091. Epub 2015 Oct 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-Linear Biomechanical Evaluation and Comparison in the Assessment of Three Different Piece Dental Implant Systems for the Molar Region: A Finite Element Study.用于磨牙区的三种不同分体式牙种植体系统评估中的非线性生物力学评价与比较:一项有限元研究
J Funct Biomater. 2025 Jan 9;16(1):17. doi: 10.3390/jfb16010017.
2
Application of Ultrashort Implants in Posterior Maxilla With Insufficient Bone Height: A Finite Element Analysis.超短种植体在后牙区骨高度不足的上颌骨中的应用:有限元分析
Int Dent J. 2025 Jun;75(3):2122-2131. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.12.026. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
3
Biomechanical Finite Element Analysis of Two Types of Short-Angled Implants Across Various Bone Classifications.

本文引用的文献

1
Three-Dimensional FEA Analysis of the Stress Distribution on Titanium and Graphene Frameworks Supported by 3 or 6-Implant Models.由3种植体或6种植体模型支持的钛和石墨烯框架应力分布的三维有限元分析
Biomimetics (Basel). 2023 Jan 1;8(1):15. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics8010015.
2
Evaluation of Stress and Fatigue on Different Implant Lengths in the Rehabilitation of Atrophic Mandibles with Full-Arch Fixed Prosthesis Using Finite Element Method.使用有限元法评估全口固定义齿修复萎缩性下颌骨时不同种植体长度的应力和疲劳情况。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022 Sep-Oct;37(5):971-981. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9514.
3
Understanding the Stress Distribution on Anatomic Customized Root-Analog Dental Implant at Bone-Implant Interface for Different Bone Densities.
两种短角度种植体在不同骨分类中的生物力学有限元分析
Materials (Basel). 2024 Nov 21;17(23):5680. doi: 10.3390/ma17235680.
4
Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution on different complex macro designs in commercially available implants: An in-vitro study.市售种植体不同复杂宏观设计应力分布的三维有限元分析:一项体外研究。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2024 Nov-Dec;14(6):761-766. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.10.003. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
5
Assessment of the Impact of Bone Quality and Abutment Configuration on the Fatigue Performance of Dental Implant Systems Using Finite Element Analysis (FEA).使用有限元分析(FEA)评估骨质量和基台配置对牙种植体系统疲劳性能的影响。
J Pers Med. 2024 Sep 28;14(10):1040. doi: 10.3390/jpm14101040.
6
Static and dynamic stress analysis of different crown materials on a titanium base abutment in an implant-supported single crown: a 3D finite element analysis.不同冠材料对钛基种植体支持单冠的静态和动态应力分析:三维有限元分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 May 10;24(1):545. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04328-0.
了解不同骨密度下解剖定制牙根模拟牙种植体在骨-种植体界面的应力分布。
Materials (Basel). 2022 Sep 14;15(18):6379. doi: 10.3390/ma15186379.
4
Three-Dimensional Finite Element Investigation into Effects of Implant Thread Design and Loading Rate on Stress Distribution in Dental Implants and Anisotropic Bone.种植体螺纹设计和加载速率对牙种植体及各向异性骨应力分布影响的三维有限元研究
Materials (Basel). 2021 Nov 18;14(22):6974. doi: 10.3390/ma14226974.
5
Stress distribution around different abutments on titanium and CFR-PEEK implant with different prosthetic crowns under parafunctional loading: A 3D FEA study.在非功能负荷下,不同修复冠的钛和碳纤维增强聚醚醚酮种植体周围不同基牙的应力分布:一项三维有限元分析研究。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2021 Apr-Jun;11(2):313-320. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2021.03.005. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
6
Finite Element Analysis of Stress in Bone and Abutment-Implant Interface under Static and Cyclic Loadings.静态和循环载荷下骨与基台-种植体界面应力的有限元分析
Front Dent. 2020 Sep;17(21):1-8. doi: 10.18502/fid.v17i21.4315. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
7
Potential risk factors for early and late dental implant failure: a retrospective clinical study on 9080 implants.早期和晚期牙种植失败的潜在风险因素:一项对9080颗种植体的回顾性临床研究
Int J Implant Dent. 2020 Nov 30;6(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s40729-020-00276-w.
8
Comparison between experimental digital image processing and numerical methods for stress analysis in dental implants with different restorative materials.不同修复材料牙种植体应力分析的实验数字图像处理与数值方法比较
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021 Jan;113:104092. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104092. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
9
Comparative Finite Element Analysis of Short Implants with Different Treatment Approaches in the Atrophic Mandible.不同治疗方法的短种植体在萎缩下颌骨中的有限元对比分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Jul/Aug;35(4):e69-e76. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8122.
10
Single-Crown, Short and Ultra-Short Implants, in Association with Simultaneous Internal Sinus Lift in the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla: A Three-Year Retrospective Study.单冠、短种植体和超短种植体联合同期上颌后牙区萎缩性骨增量:一项三年回顾性研究。
Materials (Basel). 2020 May 11;13(9):2208. doi: 10.3390/ma13092208.