Center for Bioethics and Humanities, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (J.A.), Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Hospice Analytics (C.D.K., C.T.K.), Colorado Springs, CO, USA.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Aug;66(2):87-92.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.04.006. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
Written Crisis Standards of Care guidelines have been published federally in the United States for several decades to assisted in planning for a variety of disasters, and planning documents exist in most states. Federal and state crisis planning guidelines, both before and during the early COVID pandemic, focused on saving the most lives. Palliative care (PC) and hospice shortages were exacerbated by the COVID pandemic but recognized late and incompletely.
Internet searches for state-based "crisis standards of care" completed and results categorized regarding PC and hospice planning as: 1) absent, 2) mentioned only in relation to critical care triage, 3) described only in general principles, 4) describing potential concrete plans to address PC and hospice needs.
Of the 50 states and Washington, DC, 45 states have electronically available "crisis standards of care" or emergency preparedness documents; 35 of these were written or updated since 2020. Only 20 states mention any concrete aspects of planning for potential palliative care or hospice service shortages. Guidelines most often involved alternate care sites, protective equipment, and specialist resources. Visitation policy was rarely mentioned.
Concrete planning for PC and hospice needs in state crisis planning occurs in less than half of state documents, even three years after the start of this pandemic. Failure to address these needs will result in avoidable suffering for patients in a wide range of settings. It is important to identify and address gaps before the next disaster.
几十年来,美国在联邦层面发布了书面的危机标准护理指南,以协助规划各种灾害,而且大多数州都有规划文件。联邦和州的危机规划指南,无论是在大流行之前还是在大流行早期,都侧重于拯救最多的生命。大流行加剧了姑息治疗(PC)和临终关怀的短缺,但认识到这一点较晚且不全面。
1)量化包括在大流行中认识到潜在的 PC 和临终关怀危机需求的州危机标准护理计划文件的数量。2)评估现有州危机标准护理计划中的实际计划范围。3)概述现有指南和文献中的建议要点。
在互联网上搜索基于州的“危机标准护理”,并根据以下标准对结果进行分类:1)不存在,2)仅与重症监护分诊有关,3)仅描述一般原则,4)描述解决 PC 和临终关怀需求的潜在具体计划。
在 50 个州和华盛顿特区中,有 45 个州提供了电子形式的“危机标准护理”或应急准备文件;其中 35 个是在 2020 年之后编写或更新的。只有 20 个州提到了潜在姑息治疗或临终关怀服务短缺的具体规划方面。指南最常涉及替代护理场所、个人防护设备和专家资源。很少提到探视政策。
即使在大流行开始三年后,在州危机规划中也只有不到一半的州文件涉及具体的 PC 和临终关怀需求规划。未能解决这些需求将导致在广泛的环境中患者不可避免地遭受痛苦。在下次灾难发生之前,确定和解决这些差距非常重要。