Suppr超能文献

高危特征对急性B型主动脉夹层预后的影响。

Impact of high-risk features on outcome of acute type B aortic dissection.

作者信息

Herajärvi Johanna, Mustonen Caius, Kesävuori Risto, Raivio Peter, Biancari Fausto, Jormalainen Mikko, Juvonen Tatu

机构信息

Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Research Unit of Surgery, Anesthesia, and Critical Care, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.

出版信息

JTCVS Open. 2023 Jan 16;13:20-31. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.01.005. eCollection 2023 Mar.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is a severe condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The optimal classification and treatment strategy of TBAD remain controversial and inconsistent.

METHODS

This analysis includes patients treated for acute TBAD at the Helsinki University Hospital, Finland between 2007 and 2019. The endpoints were early and late mortality, intervention of the aorta, and a composite of death and aortic intervention in uncomplicated patients and high-risk patients.

RESULTS

This study included 162 consecutive TBAD patients (27.8% females), 114 in the high-risk group and 48 in the uncomplicated group, with a mean age of 67.6 ± 13.9 years. Intramural hematoma was reported in 63 cases (38.9%). The mean follow-up was 5.1 ± 3.9 years. In-hospital/30-day mortality (n = 4; 3.5%) occurred solely in the high-risk group ( = .32). Additionally, TBAD-related adverse events (n = 23; 20.2%) were observed only in the high-risk group ( < .001). The cumulative incidences of the composite TBAD outcome with non-TBAD-related death as a competing risk were 6.6% (95% CI, 1.7%-16.5%) in the uncomplicated group and 29.5% (95% CI, 21.1%-38.3%) in the high-risk group at 5 years and 6.6% (95% CI, 1.7%-16.5%) and 33.0% (95% CI, 23.7%-42.6%) at 10 years ( = .001, Gray test). Extracardiac arteriopathy (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 2.61; 95% CI, 1.08-6.27) and coronary artery disease (SHR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.07-4.71) were risk factors for adverse aortic-related events in univariable competing-risk regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Recognition of risk factors underlying adverse events related to TBAD is essential because the disease progression impacts both early and late outcomes. Early aortic repair in high-risk TBAD may reduce long-term morbidity and mortality.

摘要

背景

急性B型主动脉夹层(TBAD)是一种严重疾病,具有较高的发病率和死亡率。TBAD的最佳分类和治疗策略仍存在争议且不一致。

方法

本分析纳入了2007年至2019年期间在芬兰赫尔辛基大学医院接受急性TBAD治疗的患者。终点指标为早期和晚期死亡率、主动脉干预情况,以及非复杂患者和高危患者的死亡与主动脉干预综合情况。

结果

本研究纳入了162例连续的TBAD患者(女性占27.8%),高危组114例,非复杂组48例,平均年龄为67.6±13.9岁。63例(38.9%)报告有壁内血肿。平均随访时间为5.1±3.9年。住院/30天死亡率(n = 4;3.5%)仅发生在高危组(P = 0.32)。此外,仅在高危组观察到与TBAD相关的不良事件(n = 23;20.2%)(P < 0.001)。以非TBAD相关死亡作为竞争风险时,非复杂组和高危组5年时TBAD综合结局的累积发生率分别为6.6%(95%CI,1.7% - 16.5%)和29.5%(95%CI,21.1% - 38.3%),10年时分别为6.6%(95%CI,1.7% - 16.5%)和33.0%(95%CI,23.7% - 42.6%)(P = 0.001,Gray检验)。在单变量竞争风险回归分析中,心外动脉病变(亚分布风险比[SHR],2.61;95%CI,1.08 - 6.27)和冠状动脉疾病(SHR,2.24;95%CI,1.07 - 4.71)是主动脉相关不良事件的危险因素。

结论

认识TBAD相关不良事件的潜在危险因素至关重要,因为疾病进展会影响早期和晚期结局。高危TBAD患者早期进行主动脉修复可能会降低长期发病率和死亡率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/965b/10091300/d2a1443f38f7/fx1.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of high-risk features on outcome of acute type B aortic dissection.
JTCVS Open. 2023 Jan 16;13:20-31. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.01.005. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
13-year single-center experience with the treatment of acute type B aortic dissection.
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2022 Dec;56(1):360-367. doi: 10.1080/14017431.2022.2127873.
3
Cause-specific mortality of type B aortic dissection and assessment of competing risks of mortality.
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Jan;73(1):48-60.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.04.499. Epub 2020 May 11.
4
Unique characteristics of the type B aortic dissection patients with malperfusion in the Vascular Quality Initiative.
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Jul;74(1):53-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.11.047. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
6
Update on the Therapeutic Strategy of Type B Aortic Dissection.
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2018 Mar 1;25(3):203-212. doi: 10.5551/jat.RV17017. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
7
Comparison of mid-term outcomes of endovascular repair and medical management in patients with acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Jul;162(1):26-36.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.11.127. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
8
Implications of secondary aortic intervention after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for acute and chronic type B dissection.
J Vasc Surg. 2019 May;69(5):1367-1378. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.07.080. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
9
TEVAR for complicated and uncomplicated type B aortic dissection-Systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Card Surg. 2021 Oct;36(10):3820-3830. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15827. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
10
Current Experience With Acute Type B Aortic Dissection: Validity of the Complication-Specific Approach in the Present Era.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Mar;101(3):936-43. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.08.074. Epub 2015 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Need for and update on clinical trials for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection.
JVS Vasc Insights. 2024;2:100130. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsvi.2024.100130.

本文引用的文献

1
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American Association for Thoracic Surgery Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Type B Aortic Dissection.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Apr;113(4):1073-1092. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.11.002. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
2
What is the optimal timing for thoracic endovascular aortic repair in uncomplicated Type B aortic dissection?
J Card Surg. 2022 Apr;37(4):993-1001. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16190. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
3
Complicated and uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissection: is an endovascular solution the "Holy Grail"?
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Nov;10(6):784-786. doi: 10.21037/acs-2021-taes-22.
4
TEVAR for complicated and uncomplicated type B aortic dissection-Systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Card Surg. 2021 Oct;36(10):3820-3830. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15827. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
5
Timing and Outcome of Endovascular Repair for Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 May;61(5):788-797. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.02.026. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
6
Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) reporting standards for type B aortic dissections.
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Mar;71(3):723-747. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.11.013. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
7
Optimal Treatment of Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: JACC Review Topic of the Week.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Sep 17;74(11):1494-1504. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.063.
8
Type B aortic dissection: new perspectives.
J Vis Surg. 2018 Apr 23;4:75. doi: 10.21037/jovs.2018.03.16. eCollection 2018.
9
10
Predictors of late aortic intervention in patients with medically treated type B aortic dissection.
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Jan;67(1):78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.05.128. Epub 2017 Sep 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验