Meng Wei, Ya-di Huang, Wei-Bo Cao, Ru-Dong Zhao, Ze-Wei Cheng, Ou Yang Jun, Ze-Peng Yan, Chuan-Qi Chen, Yi-Ze Liang, Dan-Ping Sun, Wen-Bin Yu
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Department of General Surgery, Weihai Second Hospital, Weihai, China.
Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 29;13:1167177. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1167177. eCollection 2023.
To evaluate the safety and clinical effect of tubular esophagogastric anastomosis in laparoscopic radical proximal gastrectomy.
A retrospective analysis was conducted involving 191 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical proximal gastrectomy in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from January 2017 to October 2020. Patients were divided into tubular esophagogastric anastomosis group (TG group) and traditional esophagogastric anastomosis group (EG group) according to the digestive tract reconstruction. Their intraoperative conditions, perioperative recovery and postoperative follow-up were compared. Patients were also divided into indocyanine green group and non-indocyanine green group according to whether or not indocyanine green tracer technology was used during the operation. Their intraoperative condition and perioperative recovery were compared and analyzed after propensity score matching.
The operation was successfully completed in all patients. Compared with the EG group, the TG group had less volume of gastric tube drainage, shorter gastric tube drainage time and proton pump inhibitors application time, and lower reuse rate of proton pump inhibitors. However, the TG group had a higher anastomotic stenosis at three months after surgery, as measured using anastomotic width and dysphagia score. Nevertheless, the incidence of reflux esophagitis and postoperative quality of life score in the TG group were lower compared with the EG group at 1st and 2nd year after surgery. In the indocyanine green analysis, the indocyanine green group had significantly shorter total operation time and lymph node dissection time and less intraoperative blood loss compared with the non-indocyanine green group. However, compared with the non-indocyanine green group, more postoperative lymph nodes were obtained in the indocyanine green group.
Laparoscopic radical proximal gastrectomy is safe and effective treatment option for upper gastric cancer. Tubular esophagogastric anastomosis has more advantages in restoring postoperative gastrointestinal function and reducing reflux, but it has a higher incidence of postoperative anastomotic stenosis compared with traditional esophagogastrostomy. The application of indocyanine green tracer technique in laparoscopic radical proximal gastrectomy has positive significance.
评估管状食管胃吻合术在腹腔镜近端胃癌根治术中的安全性及临床效果。
回顾性分析2017年1月至2020年10月在山东大学齐鲁医院胃肠外科接受腹腔镜近端胃癌根治术的191例患者。根据消化道重建方式将患者分为管状食管胃吻合术组(TG组)和传统食管胃吻合术组(EG组)。比较两组患者的术中情况、围手术期恢复情况及术后随访情况。同时根据术中是否使用吲哚菁绿示踪技术将患者分为吲哚菁绿组和非吲哚菁绿组,倾向得分匹配后比较分析两组患者的术中情况及围手术期恢复情况。
所有患者手术均顺利完成。与EG组相比,TG组胃管引流量少、胃管引流时间及质子泵抑制剂应用时间短,质子泵抑制剂复用率低。然而,术后3个月时,采用吻合口宽度及吞咽困难评分测量,TG组吻合口狭窄发生率较高。不过,术后第1年和第2年时,TG组反流性食管炎发生率及术后生活质量评分低于EG组。在吲哚菁绿分析中,与非吲哚菁绿组相比,吲哚菁绿组总手术时间及淋巴结清扫时间明显缩短,术中出血量少。然而,与非吲哚菁绿组相比,吲哚菁绿组术后获得的淋巴结更多。
腹腔镜近端胃癌根治术是治疗胃上部癌安全有效的方法。管状食管胃吻合术在恢复术后胃肠功能及减少反流方面有更多优势,但与传统食管胃吻合术相比,术后吻合口狭窄发生率较高。吲哚菁绿示踪技术在腹腔镜近端胃癌根治术中的应用具有积极意义。