Balasha Arsene Mushagalusa, Peša Iva
Agricultural Economics, University of Lubumbashi, PO Box 1825, Lubumbashi, People's Republic of Congo.
University of Groningen, 9712, CP, Groningen, Netherlands.
Heliyon. 2023 Mar 29;9(4):e14995. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14995. eCollection 2023 Apr.
The adverse impacts of mining industries on human health, local biodiversity, and food security are well-documented in the Katangese Copperbelt. However, farmers' perceptions of pollution and their struggles to obtain compensation for the externalities of mining industries are little addressed in scientific and public debates. Drawing on interviews with smallholder farmers, local civil society archives, oral histories, and analysis of satellite images, this article presents a case of farmers of Mulungwishi Valley whose fields and waterways were polluted by mining effluents. While 25% of respondent farmers argued that they had noticed pollution from the beginning of the 2000s, testimonies from civil society, customary authorities, and farmers concurred that the phenomenon has increased since 2010. Particularly between 2013 and 2014, the death of fish in the Mulungwishi River, the coloration of the water, the spread of mining effluents across the valley, and crop failure raised concerns and despair among farmers. Remarkable changes in land cover and use were noticeable. Since a joint impact assessment in 2014 by la Générale des Carrières et des Mines' (Gécamines) experts and farmers, civil society unsuccessfully continued a struggle to obtain compensation for about 2570 farmers affected by pollution. Despite an absolute silence of the polluter, 88% of these farmers insisted on the depollution of the valley and were willing to accept, if it was offered, financial compensation of $US 2820 per farmer. The decade-long persistence of farmers in asserting these requests debunks the view of farmers as passive or not concerned about environmental pollution. This article will be helpful for stakeholders (victims and polluters) to find common ground when resolving this environmental issue that has resulted in socio-economic difficulties beyond the valley.
矿业对人类健康、当地生物多样性和粮食安全的不利影响在加丹加铜带地区有充分的文献记载。然而,在科学和公众辩论中,农民对污染的认知以及他们为矿业外部性争取赔偿的斗争很少被提及。本文通过对小农户的访谈、当地民间社会档案、口述历史以及卫星图像分析,呈现了穆隆维希山谷农民的案例,他们的农田和水道被采矿废水污染。虽然25%的受访农民表示他们从21世纪初就注意到了污染,但民间社会、传统当局和农民的证词一致认为,自2010年以来这一现象有所增加。特别是在2013年至2014年期间,穆隆维希河鱼类死亡、河水变色、采矿废水在山谷中蔓延以及作物歉收,引发了农民的担忧和绝望。土地覆盖和使用发生了显著变化。自2014年矿业总公司(Gécamines)的专家与农民进行联合影响评估以来,民间社会一直在为约2570名受污染影响的农民争取赔偿,但未成功。尽管污染者完全沉默,但88%的这些农民坚持要求对山谷进行去污处理,并愿意接受(如果提供的话)每位农民2820美元的经济赔偿。农民们长达十年坚持这些诉求,驳斥了认为农民被动或不关心环境污染的观点。本文将有助于利益相关者(受害者和污染者)在解决这一导致山谷以外地区社会经济困难的环境问题时找到共同点。