Suppr超能文献

社交网站使用动机量表:脸书、照片墙、推特、阅后即焚和领英之间的比较研究

Motivation Scale for Using Social Network Sites: Comparative Study between Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat and LinkedIn.

作者信息

Masciantonio Alexandra, Bourguignon David

机构信息

Universitéde Lorraine, EA 7312 PErSEUs, Metz, FR.

Maastricht University, Studio Europa Maastricht, Maastricht, NL.

出版信息

Psychol Belg. 2023 Apr 11;63(1):30-43. doi: 10.5334/pb.1161. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

The increasing number of Social Network Sites (SNSs) and their changing nature raise the question of why people use them. This research has a twofold objective: first, to develop a motivation scale for using SNSs; second, to compare the motivational SNSs profile of Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat and LinkedIn. Two studies on 364 university students, using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, established six motivations: entertainment, social interaction, seeking information, instrumental use, self-documentation and self-enhancement. Regressions then examined the association between motivations for using SNSs, social influence measures (descriptive and injunctive norms), and frequency of use of Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, and LinkedIn. The results showed that social norms complement the motivations to use SNSs. Twitter use was associated with an information-seeking SNSs motivational profile. LinkedIn, Facebook, and Instagram were associated with self-documentation on SNSs. Snapchat was rather associated with instrumental motivations on SNSs. However, while all SNSs were associated with descriptive norms, only Facebook and LinkedIn were associated with injunctive norms (i.e., peer pressure). The results are discussed by applying a cross-media perspective to new motives behind SNSs use.

摘要

社交网站(SNS)数量的不断增加及其性质的变化引发了人们为何使用这些网站的问题。本研究有两个目标:第一,开发一个用于衡量使用SNS动机的量表;第二,比较脸书、照片墙、推特、阅后即焚和领英在动机方面的SNS特征。两项针对364名大学生的研究,通过探索性和验证性因素分析,确定了六种动机:娱乐、社交互动、寻求信息、工具性使用、自我记录和自我提升。随后的回归分析考察了使用SNS的动机、社会影响指标(描述性规范和指令性规范)与脸书、照片墙、推特、阅后即焚和领英使用频率之间的关联。结果表明,社会规范补充了使用SNS的动机。推特的使用与寻求信息的SNS动机特征相关。领英、脸书和照片墙与SNS上的自我记录相关。阅后即焚则与SNS上的工具性动机相关。然而,虽然所有SNS都与描述性规范相关,但只有脸书和领英与指令性规范(即同伴压力)相关。通过将跨媒体视角应用于SNS使用背后的新动机来讨论这些结果。

相似文献

9
The Evolving Role of Social Media in Pediatric Orthopaedics.社交媒体在小儿骨科中的作用演变。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2022 Apr 1;42(4):233-238. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002054.

本文引用的文献

4
The Online Social Support Scale: Measure development and validation.在线社交支持量表:编制与验证。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Sep;30(9):1127-1143. doi: 10.1037/pas0000558. Epub 2018 May 21.
9
Why Do People Use Facebook?人们为什么使用脸书?
Pers Individ Dif. 2012 Feb 1;52(3):243-249. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.007. Epub 2011 Nov 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验