Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University Health Network, 399 Bathurst Street, MP 9-325, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada.
Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University Health Network, 399 Bathurst Street, MP 9-325, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
J Affect Disord. 2021 May 1;286:360-369. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.091. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
The aim of this study was to determine the validity of using social media for depression screening.
Article searches on PubMed and PsycINFO from database inception to August 20, 2019 were completed with a search string and filters.
15 articles made the inclusion criteria. Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram profiles of depressed people were distinguishable from nondepressed people shown by social media markers. Facebook studies showed that having fewer Facebook friends and mutual friends, posting frequently, and using fewer location tags positively correlated with depressive symptoms. Also, Facebook posts with explicit expression of depressive symptoms, use of personal pronouns, and words related to pain, depressive symptoms, aggressive emotions, and rumination predicted depression. Twitter studies showed that the use of "past focus" words, negative emotions and anger words, and fewer words per Tweet positively correlated with depression. Finally, Instagram studies showed that differences in follower patterns, photo posting and editing, and linguistic features between depressed people and nondepressed people could serve as a marker.
The primary articles analyzed had different methods, which constricts the amount of comparisons that can be made. Further, only four social media platforms were explored.
Social media markers like number and content of Facebook messages, linguistic variability in tweets and tweet word count on Twitter, and number of followers, frequency of Instagram use and the content of messages on Instagram differed between depressed people and nondepressed people. Therefore, screening social media profiles on these platforms could be a valid way to detect depression.
本研究旨在确定使用社交媒体进行抑郁筛查的有效性。
从数据库建立到 2019 年 8 月 20 日,在 PubMed 和 PsycINFO 上完成了文章搜索,使用了搜索字符串和筛选器。
15 篇文章符合纳入标准。通过社交媒体标记,可区分抑郁人群和非抑郁人群的 Facebook、Twitter 和 Instagram 个人资料。Facebook 研究表明,拥有较少的 Facebook 好友和共同好友、频繁发帖以及使用较少的位置标记与抑郁症状呈正相关。此外,Facebook 帖子中明确表达抑郁症状、使用人称代词以及与疼痛、抑郁症状、攻击情绪和反刍相关的词汇可预测抑郁。Twitter 研究表明,“过去焦点”词汇、负面情绪和愤怒词汇的使用以及每条推文中的词汇较少与抑郁呈正相关。最后,Instagram 研究表明,抑郁人群和非抑郁人群之间的关注者模式、照片发布和编辑以及语言特征的差异可以作为一种标记。
分析的主要文章方法不同,限制了可以进行比较的数量。此外,仅探索了四个社交媒体平台。
社交媒体标记,如 Facebook 消息的数量和内容、Twitter 上推文的语言变化和推文字数、Instagram 的关注者数量、使用频率以及消息内容,在抑郁人群和非抑郁人群之间存在差异。因此,对这些平台的社交媒体资料进行筛查可能是一种有效的抑郁检测方法。