Luxon B A, King P D, Forker E L
Am J Physiol. 1986 May;250(5 Pt 1):G648-52. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1986.250.5.G648.
We compared the intestinal absorption of monomeric taurocholate bound to albumin with the absorption of the free form. In the presence of albumin the apparent uptake coefficient is about three times greater than that in its absence. This result resembles the one reported previously for the liver. In the gut, however, this phenomenon is attributable to the diffusive resistance of an unstirred intervillous fluid layer, whereas in the liver this explanation has been excluded. We conclude that only free taurocholate engages the bile acid transport system in ileal mucosa, whereas in the liver bile acid uptake is driven by albumin-taurocholate complexes, as well as by free taurocholate.
我们比较了与白蛋白结合的单体牛磺胆酸盐的肠道吸收与游离形式的吸收情况。在有白蛋白存在的情况下,表观摄取系数比没有白蛋白时大约大三倍。这一结果与先前报道的肝脏情况相似。然而,在肠道中,这种现象归因于未搅动的绒毛间液层的扩散阻力,而在肝脏中这种解释已被排除。我们得出结论,只有游离的牛磺胆酸盐参与回肠黏膜中的胆汁酸转运系统,而在肝脏中,胆汁酸的摄取是由白蛋白 - 牛磺胆酸盐复合物以及游离的牛磺胆酸盐驱动的。