• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度市场上质子泵抑制剂固定剂量组合的药物经济学分析

Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of Fixed-Dose Combinations of Proton Pump Inhibitors Available in India.

作者信息

Deolekar Pradnya, Vivek Kavita, Ghosh Souvik, Naseem Azra, Srivathsan Mayakalyani, Rai Vivek S, Signapurkar Sonal, Yadav Pramila

机构信息

Pharmacology, D. Y. Patil Deemed to be University, Navi Mumbai, IND.

Critical Care, D. Y. Patil Hospital, Navi Mumbai, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Mar 14;15(3):e36112. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36112. eCollection 2023 Mar.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.36112
PMID:37065352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10098438/
Abstract

Introduction The global proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) market was valued at US$ 2.9 billion in 2020 and is expected to exhibit a compound aggregated growth rate of 4.30% during the forecast period (2020-2027), as they are regularly prescribed for many gastrointestinal disorders, and the treatment usually lasts for a longer period. PPIs are usually combined with antiemetics and prokinetic drugs. The price of PPIs for the same combination varies a lot, which can lead to a lot of financial burden on the patients. Objective To evaluate the cost ratio and percentage cost variation of commonly used PPIs in various combinations. Methodology The cost of different brands of commonly used PPIs in combination with other drugs was analyzed in our study. A total of 21 different combinations (10 capsules/tablets for oral use) were tabulated by referring to the "Monthly Index of Medical Specialities" October-December 2021, and 1mg online pharmacy. The cost ratio and percentage cost variation for various brands of a particular strength and dosage form were calculated and compared. Cost ratio > 2 and cost variation > 100% were considered significant. Results The results show a huge variation (1788.88%) in costs of different brands with the highest being rabeprazole 20 mg and domperidone 10 mg (cost ratio: 18.88, percentage cost variation: 1788.88%) in oral formulation, followed by pantoprazole 40 mg and itopride 150 mg. The minimum cost ratio (1.35) and percentage cost variation (1.35%) is for pantoprazole 40 mg and levosulpiride 75 mg. Logistic regression analysis between the number of brands and percentage cost variation gives an R value of 0.0923. Conclusion There is a wide variation in the prices of PPIs available in the market, which can inadvertently increase the financial burden of therapy on patients. Physicians need to be made aware of these price differences so that they can choose the best available alternative for patients, which can help in increasing compliance with the prescribed drugs.

摘要

引言 全球质子泵抑制剂(PPI)市场在2020年的估值为29亿美元,预计在预测期(2020 - 2027年)内将呈现4.30%的复合年增长率,因为它们经常被用于多种胃肠道疾病的治疗,且治疗通常持续较长时间。PPI通常与止吐药和促动力药物联合使用。相同组合的PPI价格差异很大,这可能给患者带来很大的经济负担。目的 评估常用PPI在各种组合中的成本比率和成本变化百分比。方法 在我们的研究中分析了不同品牌常用PPI与其他药物联合使用的成本。通过参考《2021年10月至12月医学专科月度索引》和1mg在线药房,列出了总共21种不同的组合(10种口服胶囊/片剂)。计算并比较了特定强度和剂型的不同品牌的成本比率和成本变化百分比。成本比率>2且成本变化>100%被认为具有显著性。结果 结果显示不同品牌的成本存在巨大差异(1788.88%),口服制剂中最高的是雷贝拉唑20mg和多潘立酮10mg(成本比率:18.88,成本变化百分比:1788.88%),其次是泮托拉唑40mg和伊托必利150mg。成本比率最低(1.35)和成本变化百分比最低(1.35%)的是泮托拉唑40mg和左舒必利75mg。品牌数量与成本变化百分比之间的逻辑回归分析得出R值为0.0923。结论 市场上PPI的价格存在很大差异,这可能无意中增加患者的治疗经济负担。需要让医生了解这些价格差异,以便他们能够为患者选择最佳的可用替代方案,这有助于提高患者对处方药的依从性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e3d/10098438/cca151ec1070/cureus-0015-00000036112-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e3d/10098438/07c1b851bf61/cureus-0015-00000036112-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e3d/10098438/7e505422e1ff/cureus-0015-00000036112-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e3d/10098438/cca151ec1070/cureus-0015-00000036112-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e3d/10098438/07c1b851bf61/cureus-0015-00000036112-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e3d/10098438/7e505422e1ff/cureus-0015-00000036112-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e3d/10098438/cca151ec1070/cureus-0015-00000036112-i03.jpg

相似文献

1
Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of Fixed-Dose Combinations of Proton Pump Inhibitors Available in India.印度市场上质子泵抑制剂固定剂量组合的药物经济学分析
Cureus. 2023 Mar 14;15(3):e36112. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36112. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
A Cost Variation Analysis of Drugs Available in the Indian Market for the Management of Thromboembolic Disorders.印度市场上用于治疗血栓栓塞性疾病的药物成本差异分析
Cureus. 2020 May 5;12(5):e7964. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7964.
3
Letter to the Editor: Rethinking The Cost Of Antipsychotic Treatment: The Average Cost Of The Drugs Used In Turkey In 2020.给编辑的信:重新思考抗精神病药物治疗的成本:2020 年土耳其使用的药物的平均成本。
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2022 Summer;33(2):146-148. doi: 10.5080/u26315.
4
A Cost-Variation Analysis of Drugs Available in the Indian Market for the Management of Diabetic Nephropathy.印度市场上用于治疗糖尿病肾病的药物成本差异分析
Cureus. 2022 Oct 5;14(10):e29942. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29942. eCollection 2022 Oct.
5
Formulary management of proton pump inhibitors.质子泵抑制剂的处方集管理
Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 Sep;16(3):225-46. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199916030-00002.
6
Therapeutic management of uncomplicated gastroesophageal reflux disease in france in 2005: Potential cost savings of omeprazole substitution.2005年法国非复杂性胃食管反流病的治疗管理:奥美拉唑替代疗法可能节省的费用。
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2009 Aug;70(4):282-98. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2009.07.001.
7
A Pharmacoeconomic Outlook of the Biological Drugs Marketed in India: A Cost Variance Analysis.印度上市生物药物的药物经济学展望:成本差异分析
Cureus. 2023 Jan 18;15(1):e33943. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33943. eCollection 2023 Jan.
8
[Cost-effectiveness analysis of schizophrenic patient care settings: impact of an atypical antipsychotic under long-acting injection formulation].[精神分裂症患者护理环境的成本效益分析:长效注射制剂下非典型抗精神病药物的影响]
Encephale. 2005 Mar-Apr;31(2):235-46. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82390-5.
9
Qualimetric analysis of proton pump inhibitors in Ukraine.乌克兰质子泵抑制剂的质量分析
Wiad Lek. 2019;72(9 cz 2):1769-1773.
10
Inappropriate Medication Use and Cost Comparison Analysis of Proton Pump Inhibitors: Evidence from an Indian Tertiary Care Facility.质子泵抑制剂不合理用药与成本比较分析:来自印度一家三级保健机构的证据。
Curr Drug Saf. 2020;15(2):147-155. doi: 10.2174/1574886315666200311120151.

引用本文的文献

1
Prescribing trends of fixed-dose combination of domperidone and proton-pump inhibitor across tertiary care centers in India, is the combination rational?印度三级医疗中心多潘立酮与质子泵抑制剂固定剂量组合的处方趋势,这种组合合理吗?
Indian J Pharmacol. 2025 May 1;57(3):159-165. doi: 10.4103/ijp.ijp_744_23. Epub 2025 Jul 9.

本文引用的文献

1
The Use and Misuse of Proton Pump Inhibitors: An Opportunity for Deprescribing.质子泵抑制剂的使用与误用:撤药的机会。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Jan;22(1):15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.09.046. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
2
Fixed dose drug combinations - are they pharmacoeconomically sound? Findings and implications especially for lower- and middle-income countries.固定剂量药物组合 - 它们在药物经济学上是否合理?特别是对中低收入国家的发现和影响。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2020 Feb;20(1):1-26. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2020.1734456. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
3
Managing Medication Cost Burden: A Qualitative Study Exploring Experiences of People with Disabilities in Canada.
管理药物费用负担:一项探索加拿大残疾人经历的定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 23;16(17):3066. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16173066.
4
Quantifying the financial burden of households' out-of-pocket payments on medicines in India: a repeated cross-sectional analysis of National Sample Survey data, 1994-2014.量化印度家庭药品自付费用的经济负担:1994-2014 年全国抽样调查数据的重复横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2018 May 31;8(5):e018020. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018020.
5
Omeprazole-Domperidone Fixed Dose Combination vs Omeprazole Monotherapy: A Phase 4, Open-Label, Comparative, Parallel Randomized Controlled Study in Mild to Moderate Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.奥美拉唑-多潘立酮固定剂量复方制剂与奥美拉唑单药治疗对比:一项针对轻至中度胃食管反流病的4期、开放标签、比较性、平行随机对照研究。
Clin Med Insights Gastroenterol. 2017 May 31;10:1179552217709456. doi: 10.1177/1179552217709456. eCollection 2017.
6
Rabeprazole: a pharmacologic and clinical review for acid-related disorders.雷贝拉唑:酸相关性疾病的药理学与临床综述
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2009 Jan;8(1):119-26. doi: 10.1517/14740330802622892.
7
High medical cost burdens, patient trust, and perceived quality of care.高昂的医疗成本负担、患者信任以及感知到的医疗质量。
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Mar;24(3):415-20. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0879-3. Epub 2008 Dec 20.
8
Pharmacology of proton pump inhibitors.质子泵抑制剂的药理学
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2008 Dec;10(6):528-34. doi: 10.1007/s11894-008-0098-4.
9
Fixed dose drug combinations (FDCs): rational or irrational: a view point.固定剂量复方制剂(FDCs):合理还是不合理:一种观点
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 May;65(5):795-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.03089.x. Epub 2008 Feb 21.
10
Fixed-dose combinations improve medication compliance: a meta-analysis.固定剂量复方制剂可提高药物依从性:一项荟萃分析。
Am J Med. 2007 Aug;120(8):713-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.08.033.