Chao Yi-Sheng, Wu Chao-Jung, Wu Hsing-Chien, Hsu Hui-Ting, Cheng Yen-Po, Lai Yi-Chun, Chen Wei-Chih
Syndrome Mining/Index Mining/Research, Independent Researcher, Montreal, CAN.
Computer Sciences, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, CAN.
Cureus. 2023 Mar 15;15(3):e36210. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36210. eCollection 2023 Mar.
Background Composite measures are often used to represent certain concepts that cannot be measured with single variables and can be used as diagnoses, prognostic factors, or outcomes in clinical or health research. For example, frailty is a diagnosis confirmed based on the number of age-related symptoms and has been used to predict major health outcomes. However, undeclared assumptions and problems are prevalent among composite measures. Thus, we aim to propose a reporting guide and an appraisal tool for identifying these assumptions and problems. Methods We developed this reporting and assessment tool based on evidence and the consensus of experts pioneering research on index mining and syndrome mining. We designed a development framework for composite measures and then tested and revised it based on several composite measures commonly used in medical research, such as frailty, body mass index (BMI), mental illness diagnoses, and innovative indices mined for mortality prediction. We extracted review questions and reporting items from various issues identified by the development framework. This panel reviewed the identified issues, considered other aspects that might have been neglected in previous studies, and reached a consensus on the questions to be used by the reporting and assessment tool. Results We selected 19 questions in seven domains for reporting or critical assessment. Each domain contains review questions for authors and readers to critically evaluate the interpretability and validity of composite measures, which include candidate variable selection, variable inclusion and assumption declaration, data processing, weighting scheme, methods to aggregate information, composite measure interpretation and justification, and recommendations on the use. Conclusions For all seven domains, interpretability is central with respect to composite measures. Variable inclusion and assumptions are important clues to show the connection between composite measures and their theories. This tool can help researchers and readers understand the appropriateness of composite measures by exploring various issues. We recommend using this Critical Hierarchical Appraisal and repOrting tool for composite measureS (CHAOS) along with other critical appraisal tools to evaluate study design or risk of bias.
背景 综合指标常被用于表示某些无法用单一变量衡量的概念,并且可在临床或健康研究中用作诊断、预后因素或结果。例如,衰弱是一种基于与年龄相关症状数量确诊的诊断,已被用于预测主要健康结果。然而,未声明的假设和问题在综合指标中普遍存在。因此,我们旨在提出一份报告指南和一个评估工具,以识别这些假设和问题。方法 我们基于证据以及在指标挖掘和证候挖掘方面开展开创性研究的专家共识,开发了此报告和评估工具。我们设计了一个综合指标的开发框架,然后基于医学研究中常用的几种综合指标进行测试和修订,如衰弱、体重指数(BMI)、精神疾病诊断以及为死亡率预测挖掘的创新指标。我们从开发框架确定的各种问题中提取了审查问题和报告项目。该小组审查了确定的问题,考虑了先前研究中可能被忽视的其他方面,并就报告和评估工具使用的问题达成了共识。结果 我们在七个领域中选择了19个问题用于报告或批判性评估。每个领域都包含供作者和读者批判性评估综合指标的可解释性和有效性的审查问题,包括候选变量选择、变量纳入和假设声明、数据处理、加权方案、信息汇总方法、综合指标解释和理由以及使用建议。结论 对于所有七个领域而言,可解释性是综合指标的核心。变量纳入和假设是显示综合指标与其理论之间联系的重要线索。该工具可通过探索各种问题帮助研究人员和读者理解综合指标的适用性。我们建议将此综合指标批判性分层评估与报告工具(CHAOS)与其他批判性评估工具一起用于评估研究设计或偏倚风险。