Torere Beatrice E, Aiwuyo Henry O, Weigold Joseph, Gerlach Gene, Ilerhunmwuwa Nosakhare, Khan Usman, Belousova Tatiana
Internal Medicine, North Mississippi Medical Center, Tupelo, USA.
Internal Medicine, Brookdale University Hospital Medical Center, Brooklyn, USA.
Cureus. 2023 Mar 14;15(3):e36146. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36146. eCollection 2023 Mar.
The management of primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is becoming a subject of interest as there appears to be treatment failure and resistance to modern conventional treatment, necessitating a more universal and goal-directed approach to management. Our patient is a 74-year-old male who was diagnosed with ITP six years ago and recently presented to the emergency department (ED) with complaints of melena stools and severe fatigue lasting for two days. Prior to the ED presentation, he had received multiple lines of treatment including splenectomy. On admission, the pathology after splenectomy showed a benign enlarged spleen with a focal area of intraparenchymal hemorrhage/rupture and changes compatible with ITP. He was managed with multiple platelet transfusions, IV methyl prednisone succinate, rituximab, and romiplostim. His platelet counts improved to 47,000, and he was discharged home on oral steroids with outpatient hematology follow-up. However, in a few weeks, his condition deteriorated, and he presented with an increased platelet count and further multiple complaints. Romiplostim was discontinued, and he was continued on prednisone 20 mg daily, after which he improved, and his platelet count reduced to 273,000 on 20 mg prednisone. This case calls attention to the need to review the role of combination therapy in treating refractory ITP and the prevention of complications of thrombocytosis secondary to advanced therapy. Treatment needs to be more streamlined, focused, and goal-directed. Escalation and de-escalation of treatment should be synchronized to prevent adverse complications from overtreating or undertreating.
原发性免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)的管理正成为一个备受关注的话题,因为现代传统治疗似乎存在治疗失败和耐药的情况,这就需要一种更通用且目标导向的管理方法。我们的患者是一名74岁男性,六年前被诊断为ITP,最近因黑便和严重疲劳持续两天而到急诊科就诊。在到急诊科就诊之前,他已经接受了包括脾切除术在内的多线治疗。入院时,脾切除术后的病理显示脾脏良性肿大,有局灶性实质内出血/破裂,以及与ITP相符的改变。他接受了多次血小板输注、静脉注射甲泼尼龙琥珀酸钠、利妥昔单抗和罗米司亭治疗。他的血小板计数升至47,000,出院时口服类固醇,并安排门诊血液科随访。然而,几周后,他的病情恶化,血小板计数升高,并出现了更多不适。罗米司亭停药,继续每日服用20毫克泼尼松,此后他病情好转,服用20毫克泼尼松时血小板计数降至273,000。该病例提醒人们需要重新审视联合治疗在难治性ITP治疗中的作用以及预防晚期治疗继发的血小板增多症并发症。治疗需要更加简化、有针对性且目标导向。治疗的升级和降级应同步进行,以防止过度治疗或治疗不足导致不良并发症。