Suppr超能文献

高剂量地塞米松与泼尼松龙+硫唑嘌呤、利妥昔单抗、艾曲泊帕和罗米司亭治疗持续性、慢性、难治性和复发性免疫性血小板减少症患者的疗效比较

Therapeutic Outcomes of High Dose-Dexamethasone versus Prednisolone + Azathioprine, Rituximab, Eltrombopag, and Romiplostim Strategies in Persistent, Chronic, Refractory, and Relapsed Immune Thrombocytopenia Patients.

作者信息

Hamed Eman Mostafa, Ibrahim Ahmed R N, Meabed Mohamed Hussein, Khalaf Ahmed M, El Demerdash Doaa Mohamed, Elgendy Marwa O, Saeed Haitham, Salem Heba F, Rabea Hoda

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Nahda University (NUB), Beni-Suef 62521, Egypt.

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023 Aug 29;16(9):1215. doi: 10.3390/ph16091215.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an inflammatory autoimmune disease that can be managed with several treatment options. However, there is a lack of comparative data on the efficacy of these options in different phases of the disease.

AIM OF THE STUDY

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of high-dose Dexamethasone (HD-DXM), Prednisolone + Azathioprine, Rituximab, Eltrombopag, and Romiplostim schedules in persistent, chronic refractory or relapsed Egyptian ITP patients with a platelet count ≤30 × 10/L. The primary outcome measure was a sustained increase in platelet counts over 50 × 10/L for an additional 12 months without additional ITP regimens. The study also aimed to identify a suitable treatment regimen with a long remission duration for each phase of ITP.

RESULTS

Prednisolone + Azathioprine was significantly more effective in achieving an overall response in persistent patients than Romiplostim, high-dose Dexamethasone, and Rituximab. (90.9% vs. 66.6, [Odds ratio, OR: 5; confidence interval, CI 95% (0.866-28.86)], 45%, [OR: 0.082, CI 95% (0.015-0.448)] and, 25%, [OR: 30, CI 95% (4.24-211.8)], respectively, -value < 0.01). Eltrombopag was significantly more effective in achieving a durable response in refractory ITP than HD-DXM, Rituximab, and Prednisolone; (80% compared to 32.2% [OR: 0.119, CI 95% (0.035-0.410)], 22.2% [OR:0.071, CI 95% (0.011-0.455)], and 18.1% [OR: 0.056, CI 95% (0.009-0.342)], respectively, -value < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Finally, Eltrombopag following HD-DXM showed the highest percentage of patients with complete treatment-free survival times of at least 330 days. These findings could help clinicians choose the most appropriate treatment for their patients with ITP based on the phase of the disease. This trial is registered in clinicaltrials.gov with registration number NCT05861297.

摘要

背景

原发性免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)是一种炎症性自身免疫性疾病,有多种治疗方案可供选择。然而,关于这些方案在疾病不同阶段疗效的比较数据尚缺乏。

研究目的

本研究旨在评估高剂量地塞米松(HD-DXM)、泼尼松龙+硫唑嘌呤、利妥昔单抗、艾曲泊帕和罗米司亭方案对血小板计数≤30×10⁹/L的持续性、慢性难治性或复发性埃及ITP患者的疗效。主要结局指标是血小板计数持续增加至超过50×10⁹/L并维持12个月,且无需额外的ITP治疗方案。该研究还旨在为ITP的每个阶段确定一种缓解期长的合适治疗方案。

结果

在持续性患者中,泼尼松龙+硫唑嘌呤在实现总体缓解方面显著优于罗米司亭、高剂量地塞米松和利妥昔单抗。(分别为90.9% 对66.6%,[比值比,OR:5;95%置信区间,CI(0.866 - 28.86)],45%,[OR:0.082,CI 95%(0.015 - 0.448)]和25%,[OR:30,CI 95%(4.24 - 211.8)],P值<0.01)。在难治性ITP患者中,艾曲泊帕在实现持久缓解方面显著优于HD-DXM、利妥昔单抗和泼尼松龙;(分别为80% 对32.2% [OR:0.119,CI 95%(0.035 - 0.410)],22.2% [OR:0.071,CI 95%(0.011 - 0.455)]和18.1% [OR:0.056,CI 95%(0.009 - 0.342)],P值<0.01)。

结论

最后,HD-DXM后使用艾曲泊帕的患者中,完全无治疗生存期至少330天的比例最高。这些发现有助于临床医生根据疾病阶段为ITP患者选择最合适的治疗方法。本试验已在clinicaltrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT05861297。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4d8/10537035/8b4b5fd2e94e/pharmaceuticals-16-01215-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验