• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经腹腔前路腰大肌前方腰椎体间融合术:适应证、技术和临床结果。

Endoscopic anterior to psoas lumbar interbody fusion: indications, techniques, and clinical outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-Gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea.

Smt. SCL General Hospital, Smt NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2023 Aug;32(8):2776-2795. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07700-w. Epub 2023 Apr 17.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-023-07700-w
PMID:37067598
Abstract

PURPOSE

The retrospective study aimed to report the surgical technique and clinic-radiological outcomes of endoscopic anterior to psoas interbody lumbar fusion through the retroperitoneal approach with direct and indirect decompression.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the results of clinical parameters of patients who underwent endoscopic anterior to psoas interbody lumbar fusion between June 2013 and June 2022. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by the visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. The radiological outcomes were measured and statistically compared in disc height index (DHI), whole lumbar lordosis (WLL), pelvic Incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), Segmental lordosis (SL), the sagittal vertical axis (SVA).

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients were selected for the procedure ranging in age from 51 to 84 years with 17.83 ± 8.85 months follow-up. The mean operation time in lateral position for one level was 162.96 ± 35.76 min (n = 24), and 207.73 ± 66.60 min for two-level fusion. The mean endoscopic time was 32.83 ± 17.71 min per level, with a total estimated blood loss of 230.57 ± 187.22 cc. The mean postoperative VAS back, leg pain score and ODI improved significantly compared to the preoperative values; Radiological data showed significant change in WLL, SL, DHI, PI, PT, and SS; however, there is no significant difference in SVA postoperatively. Subgroup analysis for the radiographic data showed 50 mm length cage has significantly improved for the DHI, SS and SVA compare to 40 mm length cage. The subgroup analysis results showed that hypertensive patients had significantly higher proportion in the incomplete fusion group compare to complete fusion group at one-year follow-up.

OUTCOMES

The endoscopic anterior to psoas interbody lumbar fusion achieves satisfactory indirect and direct decompression. This convergent technique presents an effective choice for treating lumbar instability associated with disc herniations and foraminal stenosis, thus complementing the indications for oblique lumbar interbody fusion.

摘要

目的

本回顾性研究旨在报告经腹膜后入路行内镜下腰大肌前方椎间融合术(通过直接和间接减压)的手术技术和临床影像学结果。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2013 年 6 月至 2022 年 6 月期间接受内镜下腰大肌前方椎间融合术的患者的临床参数结果。通过视觉模拟评分(VAS)和 Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)评分评估临床结果。通过测量并统计比较椎间盘高度指数(DHI)、全腰椎前凸(WLL)、骨盆入射角(PI)、骨盆倾斜角(PT)、节段前凸(SL)、矢状垂直轴(SVA)来评估影像学结果。

结果

共选择 35 例年龄 51 至 84 岁的患者进行该手术,平均随访 17.83±8.85 个月。单节段融合时,侧卧位的平均手术时间为 162.96±35.76 分钟(n=24),双节段融合时为 207.73±66.60 分钟。每节段的平均内镜时间为 32.83±17.71 分钟,总估计失血量为 230.57±187.22cc。与术前相比,术后 VAS 背部、腿部疼痛评分和 ODI 显著改善;影像学数据显示 WLL、SL、DHI、PI、PT 和 SS 有显著变化;然而,术后 SVA 无显著差异。影像学数据的亚组分析显示,50mm 长度的椎间融合器在 DHI、SS 和 SVA 方面的改善明显优于 40mm 长度的椎间融合器。亚组分析结果显示,高血压患者在术后 1 年随访时,不完全融合组的比例明显高于完全融合组。

结论

内镜下腰大肌前方椎间融合术可实现满意的间接和直接减压。这种融合技术为治疗与椎间盘突出和神经孔狭窄相关的腰椎不稳定提供了有效的选择,从而补充了斜向腰椎体间融合术的适应证。

相似文献

1
Endoscopic anterior to psoas lumbar interbody fusion: indications, techniques, and clinical outcomes.经腹腔前路腰大肌前方腰椎体间融合术:适应证、技术和临床结果。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Aug;32(8):2776-2795. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07700-w. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
2
Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.评估可活动扩张式椎间融合器在微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症中的影像学和临床结果。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Jan;44(1):E8. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17562.
3
The anterior-to-psoas approach for interbody fusion at the L5-S1 segment: clinical and radiological outcomes.前路腰大肌前方入路行 L5-S1 节段椎体间融合:临床与影像学结果。
Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Sep;49(3):E14. doi: 10.3171/2020.6.FOCUS20335.
4
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.使用可扩张与静态椎间融合器的微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:矢状节段和骨盆参数的影像学评估
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E10. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17197.
5
Preliminary results of anterior lumbar interbody fusion, anterior column realignment for the treatment of sagittal malalignment.前路腰椎椎体间融合术、前柱矫正治疗矢状面失平衡的初步结果。
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Dec;43(6):E6. doi: 10.3171/2017.8.FOCUS17423.
6
Lumbar degenerative disease after oblique lateral interbody fusion: sagittal spinopelvic alignment and its impact on low back pain.腰椎退行性疾病后路斜外侧椎间融合术后:矢状位脊柱骨盆参数及其对下腰痛的影响。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Aug 14;15(1):326. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01837-w.
7
[COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS AND CHANGE OF SAGITTAL SPINO-PELVIC PARAMETERS BETWEEN MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANSFORAMINAL AND CONVENTIONAL OPEN POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSIONS IN TREATMENT OF LOW-DEGREE ISTHMIC LUMBAR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS].[微创经椎间孔与传统开放后路腰椎椎间融合术治疗低度峡部裂型腰椎滑脱症的矢状位脊柱-骨盆参数有效性及变化比较]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Dec;29(12):1504-9.
8
Utility of multilevel lateral interbody fusion of the thoracolumbar coronal curve apex in adult deformity surgery in combination with open posterior instrumentation and L5-S1 interbody fusion: a case-matched evaluation of 32 patients.胸腰段冠状面弯曲顶点多级外侧椎间融合术在成人脊柱畸形手术中联合开放后路内固定及L5-S1椎间融合的效用:32例病例匹配评估
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Feb;26(2):208-219. doi: 10.3171/2016.8.SPINE151543. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
9
Radiological and clinical outcomes following extreme lateral interbody fusion.极外侧椎间融合术后的放射学和临床结果。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Jun;20(6):623-35. doi: 10.3171/2014.1.SPINE13569. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
10
Comparative analysis of 3 surgical strategies for adult spinal deformity with mild to moderate sagittal imbalance.成人脊柱畸形伴轻至中度矢状面失衡的三种手术策略的比较分析
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Jan;28(1):40-49. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.SPINE161370. Epub 2017 Nov 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolving Paradigms in Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Learning Curves in Minimally Invasive Spine Techniques.脊柱外科不断演变的范式:微创脊柱技术学习曲线的系统评价
Neurospine. 2024 Dec;21(4):1251-1275. doi: 10.14245/ns.2448838.419. Epub 2024 Dec 31.
2
The Evolution of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Journey from Past to Present.腰椎侧路椎间融合术的演变:从过去到现在。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Feb 23;60(3):378. doi: 10.3390/medicina60030378.
3
The Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Narrative Review, and Future Perspective.

本文引用的文献

1
Incidence of major and minor vascular injuries during lateral access lumbar interbody fusion procedures: a retrospective comparative study and systematic literature review.外侧入路腰椎体间融合术期间主要和次要血管损伤的发生率:回顾性对比研究和系统文献复习。
Neurosurg Rev. 2022 Apr;45(2):1275-1289. doi: 10.1007/s10143-021-01699-8. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
2
Charlson Comorbidity Index: An Inaccurate Predictor of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Fusion Outcomes.查尔森合并症指数:微创腰椎融合术结果的不准确预测指标
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Aug;15(4):770-779. doi: 10.14444/8099. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
3
Trends in lumbar spinal fusion-a literature review.
内镜下腰椎椎间融合术:一篇叙述性综述及未来展望
Neurospine. 2023 Dec;20(4):1224-1245. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346888.444. Epub 2023 Dec 31.
4
Full-endoscopic bilateral over-the-top decompression in lumbar central stenosis: surgical technique and outcomes.全内镜双侧过顶减压治疗腰椎中央型狭窄:手术技术与疗效。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Aug;32(8):2918-2923. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07750-0. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
腰椎融合术的发展趋势——文献综述
J Spine Surg. 2020 Dec;6(4):752-761. doi: 10.21037/jss-20-492.
4
Intraoperative Radiographs in Single-level Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Can Predict Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Follow-up 2 Years After Surgery.单节段侧方腰椎椎间融合术中的术中放射学可以预测术后 2 年随访的影像学和临床结果。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 Jun 1;46(11):772-780. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003889.
5
Inclusion of L5-S1 in oblique lumbar interbody fusion-techniques and early complications-a single center experience.L5-S1 节段在斜外侧腰椎间融合术中的应用——一项单中心经验。
Spine J. 2021 Mar;21(3):418-429. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.10.016. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
6
Approach-based Comparative and Predictor Analysis of 30-day Readmission, Reoperation, and Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using the ACS-NSQIP Dataset.基于方法的 30 天再入院、再手术和发病率的比较分析,以及使用 ACS-NSQIP 数据集行腰椎体间融合术的患者。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Mar 15;44(6):432-441. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002850.
7
Trends in Lumbar Fusion Procedure Rates and Associated Hospital Costs for Degenerative Spinal Diseases in the United States, 2004 to 2015.美国 2004 年至 2015 年退行性脊柱疾病腰椎融合术率及相关医院费用的变化趋势。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Mar 1;44(5):369-376. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002822.
8
Critical analysis of trends in lumbar fusion for degenerative disorders revisited: influence of technique on fusion rate and clinical outcomes.对退行性疾病腰椎融合术趋势的批判性分析再探讨:技术对融合率和临床结果的影响
Eur Spine J. 2018 Aug;27(8):1868-1876. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5544-x. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
9
Clinical and radiological outcomes of spinal endoscopic discectomy-assisted oblique lumbar interbody fusion: preliminary results.脊柱内镜下椎间盘切除术辅助斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术的临床和影像学结果:初步结果
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E13. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17196.
10
A Comparison of Anterior and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusions: Complications, Readmissions, Discharge Dispositions, and Costs.前路和后路腰椎体间融合术的比较:并发症、再入院、出院去向和费用。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Dec 15;42(24):1865-1870. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002248.