Suppr超能文献

现代数字肌动描记仪与利用档案草力量换能器的肌动描记仪的比较。

Comparison of a Modern Digital Mechanomyograph to a Mechanomyograph Utilizing an Archival Grass Force Transducer.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care, University of California - Irvine, Irvine, California.

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 2023 Aug 1;139(2):164-172. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004590.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mechanomyography is the traditional gold standard research technique for quantitative assessment of neuromuscular blockade. Mechanomyography directly measures the isometric force generated by the thumb in response to ulnar nerve stimulation. Researchers must construct their own mechanomyographs since commercial instruments are no longer available. A mechanomyograph was constructed, and its performance was compared against an archival mechanomyography system from the 1970s that utilized an FT-10 Grass force transducer, hypothesizing that train-of-four ratios recorded on each device would be equivalent.

METHODS

A mechanomyograph was constructed using 3D-printed components and modern electronics. An archival mechanomyography system was assembled from original components, including an FT-10 Grass force transducer. Signal digitization for computerized data collection was utilized instead of the original paper strip chart recorder. Both devices were calibrated with standard weights to demonstrate linear voltage response curves. The mechanomyographs were affixed to opposite arms of patients undergoing surgery, and the train-of-four ratio was measured during the onset and recovery from rocuronium neuromuscular blockade.

RESULTS

Calibration measurements exhibited a positive linear association between voltage output and calibration weights with a linear correlation coefficient of 1.00 for both mechanomyography devices. The new mechanomyograph had better precision and measurement sensitivity than the archival system: 5.3 mV versus 15.5 mV and 1.6 mV versus 5.7 mV, respectively (P < 0.001 for both). A total of 767 pairs of train-of-four ratio measurements obtained from eight patients had positive linear association (R 2 = 0.94; P < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis resulted in bias of 3.8% and limits of agreement of -13% and 21%.

CONCLUSIONS

The new mechanomyograph resulted in similar train-of-four ratio measurements compared to an archival mechanomyography system utilizing an FT-10 Grass force transducer. These results demonstrated continuity of gold standard measurement of neuromuscular blockade spanning nearly 50 yr, despite significant changes in the instrumentation technology.

摘要

背景

肌动描记术是定量评估神经肌肉阻滞的传统金标准研究技术。肌动描记术直接测量尺神经刺激引起的拇指等长力。由于商业仪器已不再可用,研究人员必须自行构建肌动描记器。构建了一种肌动描记器,并将其性能与 20 世纪 70 年代使用 FT-10 草皮力传感器的档案肌动描记系统进行了比较,假设两种设备记录的强直刺激四个成串比值相等。

方法

使用 3D 打印组件和现代电子设备构建肌动描记器。从原始组件组装档案肌动描记系统,包括 FT-10 草皮力传感器。使用计算机化数据采集进行信号数字化,而不是原始纸带记录器。两种设备均用标准砝码进行校准,以展示线性电压响应曲线。肌动描记器固定在接受手术的患者的相反手臂上,并在罗库溴铵神经肌肉阻滞的发作和恢复期间测量强直刺激四个成串比值。

结果

校准测量显示,电压输出与校准砝码之间存在正线性关系,两种肌动描记器的线性相关系数均为 1.00。新肌动描记器比档案系统具有更好的精度和测量灵敏度:分别为 5.3 mV 和 15.5 mV,1.6 mV 和 5.7 mV(均 P < 0.001)。从 8 名患者获得的 767 对强直刺激四个成串比值测量值具有正线性关联(R²=0.94;P < 0.001)。Bland-Altman 分析导致偏差 3.8%,一致性界限为-13%和 21%。

结论

与使用 FT-10 草皮力传感器的档案肌动描记系统相比,新肌动描记器产生的强直刺激四个成串比值测量值相似。这些结果表明,尽管仪器技术发生了重大变化,但神经肌肉阻滞的金标准测量仍保持了近 50 年的连续性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验