And then there was one … incision. First single-port pediatric robotic case series.

BACKGROUND

In the past two decades, technology has advanced to augment an already minimally-invasive approach in laparoscopic surgery. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic platforms have now evolved to its 4th-generation product: a single-port system, first cleared through the FDA for urologic procedures last year. A single, 2.5 cm incision allows for placement of a port that admits a fully-wristed camera as well as three fully-wristed instruments, all controlled by the surgeon at the console.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to document the feasibility of the single-port (SP) robotic platform in the first clinical series of pediatric patients, reporting use of this system for dismembered pyeloplasty and Mitrofanoff. Secondary aims were to report intraoperative details and perioperative outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Seven patients underwent surgery using the da Vinci SP Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA). Six patients, two girls and 4 boys, were diagnosed with ureteropelvic junction obstruction and underwent SP robotic-assisted dismembered pyeloplasty while one male patient with neurogenic bladder underwent SP robotic-assisted Mitrofanoff procedure. Patient's ages ranged from 22 months to 14 years. A 2.5-cm incision was made within the Pfannenstiel line in HIdES fashion for the pyeloplasties, while the previous gastrostomy tube site was used for the Mitrofanoff. Through this incision a 25-mm multichannel port was placed. The 12 × 10-mm articulating robotic camera and two 6-mm articulating robotic instruments were utilized.

RESULTS

All surgeries were completed successfully through the single port without intraoperative complications, need for separate ports, or conversion. Median operative time was 120 min, and all patients were dismissed in less than 24 h, taking only acetaminophen and ibuprofen for pain control. There was no issue with instrumentation in older patients; however, shorter working distance in the 22-month-old pyeloplasty limited wristing of the instruments.

CONCLUSIONS

We report the first cases utilizing the SP robotic platform in children. Despite their smaller size and limited workspace, we had no issues with instrument clashing or triangulation in older patients, completing the procedures in a similar timeframe as multiport robotic platforms. Use of the SP platform is not recommended if working distance will be < 10 cm from the end of the port as instrument movement is prohibitive. The HIdES approach of placing the port in the Pfannenstiel line gave additional working distance and kept the incision below the swimsuit line for excellent cosmesis (Figure 1). Further study with additional cases will compare this approach with standard multiport robotics to analyze and compare operative data and outcomes.