Rayamajhi Sumugdha, Sharma Shailendra, Iftikhar Hasan
Internal Medicine, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, East Lansing, USA.
Nephrology, Sparrow Health System, Lansing, USA.
Cureus. 2023 Mar 16;15(3):e36218. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36218. eCollection 2023 Mar.
A high serum bromide level can cause erroneously high serum chloride levels measured through routine assays. Here, we describe a case of pseudohyperchloremia in which routine labs showed a negative anion gap and elevated chloride levels measured with ion-selective assay. The serum chloride level was found to be lower when measured with a chloridometer that employs a colorimetric method of quantification. The initial serum bromide level was elevated at 1100 mg/L that was confirmed by repeating the test that again showed an elevated level of 1600 mg/L and appeared to cause erroneous hyperchloremia when using conventional serum chloride quantification methods. Our case highlights lab errors and factitious hyperchloremia as a cause of the negative anion gap caused by bromism, even without a clear history of bromide exposure. The case also underscores the importance of chloride measurement using both colorimetric methods and ion-selective assay in the case of hyperchloremia.
高血清溴水平可导致通过常规检测方法测得的血清氯水平出现错误的升高。在此,我们描述一例假性高氯血症病例,常规实验室检查显示阴离子间隙为负,且采用离子选择性检测法测得的氯水平升高。当使用采用比色法定量的氯化物计进行测量时,发现血清氯水平较低。初始血清溴水平升高至1100 mg/L,重复检测后得到确认,再次显示升高至1600 mg/L,并且在使用传统血清氯定量方法时似乎导致了错误的高氯血症。我们的病例强调了实验室误差和人为性高氯血症是由溴中毒引起的阴离子间隙为负的原因,即使没有明确的溴暴露史。该病例还强调了在高氯血症情况下同时使用比色法和离子选择性检测法进行氯测量的重要性。