• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多发性硬化症患者的护理伙伴员工按疾病严重程度划分的临床和经济影响

The Clinical and Economic Impact of Employees Who Are Care Partners of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis by Disease Severity.

作者信息

Hendin Barry, Brook Richard A, Beren Ian A, Kleinman Nathan, Fink Cindy, Phillips Amy L, Lobo Carroline

机构信息

University of Arizona, Tucson.

Better Health Worldwide, Inc, Newfoundland, New Jersey.

出版信息

J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2023 Apr 13;10(1):91-101. doi: 10.36469/001c.57593. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.36469/001c.57593
PMID:37069893
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10105615/
Abstract

Research on employee care partners of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) is limited. The clinical and economic impact on employee care partners was evaluated by MS disease severity. Employees with spouses/domestic partners with MS from the Workpartners database (Jan. 1, 2010-Dec. 31, 2019) were eligible if: spouse/partner had at least 3 MS-related (ICD-9-CM/ICD-10-CM:340.xx/G35) inpatient/outpatient/disease-modifying therapy claims within 1 year (latest claim = index date); 6-month pre-index/1-year post-index enrollment; and age 18 to 64 years. Employee care partners' demographic/clinical characteristics and direct/indirect costs were compared across predetermined MS severity categories. Logistic and generalized linear regression modeled the costs. Among 1041 employee care partners of patients with MS, 358 (34.4%) patients had mild MS, 491 (47.2%) moderate, and 192 (18.4%) severe. Mean (standard error [SE]) employee care partner age was 49.0 (0.5) for patients with mild disease, 50.5 (0.4) for moderate, 51.7 (0.6) for severe; percent female care partners was 24.6% [2.3%] mild, 19.8% [1.8%] moderate, 27.6% [3.2%] severe; and mean care partner Charlson Comorbidity Index scores 0.28 (0.05) mild, 0.30 (0.04) moderate, 0.27 (0.06) severe. More care partners of patients with moderate/severe vs mild MS had hyperlipidemia (32.6%/31.8% vs 21.2%), hypertension (29.5%/29.7% vs 19.3%), gastrointestinal disease (20.8%/22.9% vs 13.1%), depression (9.2%/10.9% vs 3.9%), and anxiety 10.6%/8.9% vs 4.2%). Adjusted mean medical costs were greater for employee care partners of patients with moderate vs mild/severe disease (<.001). Pharmacy costs (SE) were lower for employee care partners of mild vs severe/moderate patients (<.005). Sick leave costs (SE) were greater for employee care partners of mild/severe vs moderate patients (<.05). Employee care partners of patients with moderate/severe vs mild MS had more comorbidities (ie, hypertension, gastrointestinal disease, depression, and anxiety) and higher pharmacy costs. Employee care partners of patients with moderate vs mild/severe MS had higher medical and lower sick leave costs. Treatment strategies that improve patient outcomes may reduce employee care partner burden and lower costs for employers in some instances. Comorbidities and direct/indirect costs of employees whose spouses/partners have MS were considerable and varied with MS severity.

摘要

对多发性硬化症(MS)患者的员工护理伙伴的研究有限。通过MS疾病严重程度评估对员工护理伙伴的临床和经济影响。来自Workpartners数据库(2010年1月1日至2019年12月31日)中配偶/同居伴侣患有MS的员工符合以下条件则纳入研究:配偶/伴侣在1年内有至少3次与MS相关(ICD - 9 - CM/ICD - 10 - CM:340.xx/G35)的住院/门诊/疾病修正治疗索赔(最新索赔日期 = 索引日期);索引日期前6个月/索引日期后1年的登记;年龄在18至64岁之间。在预先确定的MS严重程度类别中比较员工护理伙伴的人口统计学/临床特征以及直接/间接成本。采用逻辑回归和广义线性回归对成本进行建模。在1041名MS患者的员工护理伙伴中,358名(34.4%)患者患有轻度MS,491名(47.2%)患有中度MS,192名(18.4%)患有重度MS。轻度疾病患者的员工护理伙伴平均(标准误[SE])年龄为49.0(0.5)岁,中度为50.5(0.4)岁,重度为51.7(0.6)岁;女性护理伙伴的比例分别为轻度24.6%[2.3%],中度19.8%[1.8%],重度27.6%[3.2%];护理伙伴的平均Charlson合并症指数得分分别为轻度0.28(0.05),中度0.30(0.04),重度0.27(0.06)。与轻度MS患者相比,中度/重度MS患者的护理伙伴患有高脂血症(32.6%/31.8% 对 21.2%)、高血压(29.5%/29.7% 对 19.3%)、胃肠道疾病(20.8%/22.9% 对 13.1%)、抑郁症(9.2%/10.9% 对 3.9%)和焦虑症(10.6%/8.9% 对 4.2%)的比例更高。与轻度/重度疾病患者相比,中度疾病患者的员工护理伙伴的调整后平均医疗成本更高(<.001)。与重度/中度患者相比,轻度患者的员工护理伙伴的药房成本(SE)更低(<.005)。与中度患者相比,轻度/重度患者的员工护理伙伴的病假成本(SE)更高(<.05)。与轻度MS患者相比,中度/重度MS患者的员工护理伙伴有更多合并症(即高血压、胃肠道疾病、抑郁症和焦虑症)且药房成本更高。与轻度/重度MS患者相比,中度MS患者的员工护理伙伴有更高的医疗成本和更低的病假成本。在某些情况下,改善患者预后的治疗策略可能会减轻员工护理伙伴的负担并降低雇主的成本。配偶/伴侣患有MS的员工的合并症以及直接/间接成本相当可观,且随MS严重程度而变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25f5/10105615/5654ba177499/jheor_2023_10_1_57593_155912.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25f5/10105615/b452752a9de1/jheor_2023_10_1_57593_155805.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25f5/10105615/5654ba177499/jheor_2023_10_1_57593_155912.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25f5/10105615/b452752a9de1/jheor_2023_10_1_57593_155805.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25f5/10105615/5654ba177499/jheor_2023_10_1_57593_155912.jpg

相似文献

1
The Clinical and Economic Impact of Employees Who Are Care Partners of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis by Disease Severity.多发性硬化症患者的护理伙伴员工按疾病严重程度划分的临床和经济影响
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2023 Apr 13;10(1):91-101. doi: 10.36469/001c.57593. eCollection 2023.
2
The implications of suboptimal year-1 outcomes with disease-modifying therapy in employees with multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症患者接受疾病修正治疗后第一年效果不理想的影响。
J Med Econ. 2021 Jan-Dec;24(1):479-486. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2021.1906013.
3
All-cause health care utilization and costs associated with newly diagnosed multiple sclerosis in the United States.美国新诊断多发性硬化症的全因医疗保健利用情况及相关费用。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2010 Nov-Dec;16(9):703-12. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2010.16.9.703.
4
The cost of disability and medically related absenteeism among employees with multiple sclerosis in the US.美国多发性硬化症员工的残疾成本及与医疗相关的缺勤情况。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(8):681-91. doi: 10.2165/11314700-000000000-00000.
5
Costs and absence of HCV-infected employees by disease stage.按疾病阶段划分的丙型肝炎病毒感染员工的成本及缺勤情况。
J Med Econ. 2015;18(9):691-703. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1045423. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
6
Clinical and economic characterization of mild, moderate, and severe systemic lupus erythematosus: Real-world observation across payer channels in the United States.轻度、中度和重度系统性红斑狼疮的临床和经济学特征:美国支付渠道的真实世界观察。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Sep;29(9):1010-1020. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.9.1010.
7
Impact of Pain Severity and Opioid Use on Health Care Resource Utilization and Costs Among Patients with Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis.疼痛严重程度和阿片类药物使用对膝和髋骨关节炎患者医疗资源利用和成本的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Sep;25(9):957-965. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.9.957.
8
Economic impact of multiple sclerosis disease-modifying drugs in an employed population: direct and indirect costs.就业人群中多发性硬化症疾病修正药物的经济影响:直接成本与间接成本
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Apr;25(4):869-77. doi: 10.1185/03007990902743869.
9
Evaluating the Effect of Treatment Persistence on the Economic Burden of Moderate to Severe Psoriasis and/or Psoriatic Arthritis Patients in the U.S. Department of Defense Population.评估治疗持续性对美国国防部人群中中重度银屑病和/或银屑病关节炎患者经济负担的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Jul;24(7):654-663. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.7.654.
10
Economic Burden of Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea: Retrospective Analysis of a U.S. Commercially Insured Population.经济负担与腹泻型肠易激综合征:美国商业保险人群的回顾性分析。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Apr;23(4):453-460. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.16138. Epub 2016 Nov 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Multiple sclerosis greatly impacts family members/partners: Evidence using the Family Reported Outcome Measure (FROM-16).多发性硬化症对家庭成员/伴侣有重大影响:使用家庭报告结局量表(FROM-16)的证据。
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2025 May 27;11(2):20552173251338762. doi: 10.1177/20552173251338762. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
2
Understanding Diverse Caregiver Experiences and Their Impact on Caregiver Burden in Multiple Sclerosis.了解多发性硬化症中不同护理人员的经历及其对护理人员负担的影响。
Int J MS Care. 2025 Apr 28;27(Q2):125-133. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2024-025. eCollection 2025 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
The Association Between Persistence and Adherence to Disease-Modifying Therapies and Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis.多发性硬化症患者中疾病修正疗法的持续使用与依从性与医疗资源利用及成本之间的关联
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2022 Apr 26;9(1):111-116. doi: 10.36469/jheor.2022.33288. eCollection 2022.
2
The Economic Burden of Multiple Sclerosis in the United States: Estimate of Direct and Indirect Costs.美国多发性硬化症的经济负担:直接和间接成本的估计。
Neurology. 2022 May 3;98(18):e1810-e1817. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200150. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
3
Adherence to Therapy in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis-Review.
多发性硬化症患者的治疗依从性-综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 15;19(4):2203. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042203.
4
Multiple sclerosis caregiving: A systematic scoping review to map current state of knowledge.多发性硬化症护理:系统范围综述以绘制当前知识状况图。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Jul;30(4):e874-e897. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13687. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
5
Caregiver Burden in Multiple Sclerosis: Recent Trends and Future Directions.多发性硬化症患者的照护负担:最新趋势与未来方向。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2020 May 22;20(7):18. doi: 10.1007/s11910-020-01043-5.
6
Clinically stable disease is associated with a lower risk of both income loss and disability pension for patients with multiple sclerosis.临床稳定的疾病与多发性硬化症患者收入损失和残疾养老金风险降低相关。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020 Jan;91(1):67-74. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2019-321523. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
7
Quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis: A study with patients and caregivers.多发性硬化症患者的生活质量:一项患者和照护者的研究。
Disabil Health J. 2019 Oct;12(4):628-634. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
8
Caregiver strain among life partners of persons with mild disability due to relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.伴有复发缓解型多发性硬化的轻度残疾患者的生活伴侣的照料者负担。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Jun;31:5-11. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
9
Beyond care burden: associations between positive psychological appraisals and well-being among informal caregivers in Europe.超越照顾负担:欧洲非正式照护者的积极心理评价与幸福感之间的关联。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Aug;28(8):2135-2146. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02122-y. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
10
The Relational Impact of Multiple Sclerosis: An Integrative Review of the Literature Using a Cognitive Analytic Framework.多发性硬化症的关系影响:使用认知分析框架对文献的综合综述
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2017 Dec;24(3-4):316-340. doi: 10.1007/s10880-017-9506-y.