• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超越照顾负担:欧洲非正式照护者的积极心理评价与幸福感之间的关联。

Beyond care burden: associations between positive psychological appraisals and well-being among informal caregivers in Europe.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland.

School of Business, National College of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2019 Aug;28(8):2135-2146. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02122-y. Epub 2019 Feb 4.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-019-02122-y
PMID:30715685
Abstract

PURPOSE

The burden of caring for a family member or friend can have a negative impact on caregiver health and well-being, yet caring can also have positive consequences. Understanding the factors that may enhance caregiver well-being is merited.

METHODS

We used data gathered from the European Quality of Life Survey (EQLS). Using complete case analysis followed by multiple imputation analysis, a series of multilevel regression models were developed to systematically explore the role of three distinct blocks of factors in predicting caregiver well-being as measured by the WHO-5 well-being index: (1) sociodemographic and health factors, (2) care and burden-related factors, and (3) psychological and social appraisals. Differences between frequent caregivers and the general population were also compared on all measures.

RESULTS

36,908 respondents took part in EQLS, with 4171 (11%) identifying as frequent carers. While frequent caregivers reported lower well-being compared to the remaining population, most were happy with the amount of time spent caring. Our model explained approximately 32% of variance in well-being scores. After examining the role of known risk factors, all positive psychological appraisals were associated with higher well-being (p < .001). In order of magnitude these were optimism, perceived autonomy, sense of purpose, resilience, and perceived levels of social inclusion. Self-rated health was the strongest predictor of well-being while female carers and those with high levels of various burden measures reported lower well-being.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest that caregiver well-being is influenced by more than simply the burden of care. As well as attempting to reduce burden, interventions aimed at supporting caregivers could focus on fostering more positive appraisals to enhance well-being in this group.

摘要

目的

照顾家庭成员或朋友会给照顾者的健康和幸福感带来负面影响,但照顾也可能带来积极的结果。了解可能增强照顾者幸福感的因素是值得的。

方法

我们使用了欧洲生活质量调查(EQLS)收集的数据。采用完全案例分析和多次插补分析,我们开发了一系列多层次回归模型,系统地探讨了三个不同因素块在预测照顾者幸福感方面的作用,幸福感用 WHO-5 幸福感指数来衡量:(1)社会人口学和健康因素;(2)照顾和负担相关因素;(3)心理和社会评估。还比较了频繁照顾者和一般人群在所有测量指标上的差异。

结果

36908 名受访者参加了 EQLS,其中 4171 名(11%)被确定为频繁照顾者。虽然频繁照顾者的幸福感比其余人群低,但大多数人对照顾所花费的时间感到满意。我们的模型解释了幸福感得分差异的约 32%。在检查了已知风险因素的作用后,所有积极的心理评估都与更高的幸福感相关(p<0.001)。按数量级排列,这些因素依次为乐观、感知自主性、使命感、韧性和感知社会包容度。自评健康是幸福感的最强预测因素,而女性照顾者和那些负担较重的照顾者报告的幸福感较低。

结论

研究结果表明,照顾者的幸福感不仅仅受到照顾负担的影响。除了试图减轻负担外,旨在支持照顾者的干预措施可以侧重于培养更积极的评估,以提高这一群体的幸福感。

相似文献

1
Beyond care burden: associations between positive psychological appraisals and well-being among informal caregivers in Europe.超越照顾负担:欧洲非正式照护者的积极心理评价与幸福感之间的关联。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Aug;28(8):2135-2146. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02122-y. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
2
Mediating effects of burden on quality of life for caregivers of first-time stroke patients discharged from the hospital within one year.一年内出院的首次中风患者照顾者负担对生活质量的中介作用。
BMC Neurol. 2018 Apr 25;18(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12883-018-1057-9.
3
Gender differences in caregiver burden and its determinants in family members of terminally ill cancer patients.晚期癌症患者家庭成员中照顾者负担的性别差异及其决定因素
Psychooncology. 2016 Jul;25(7):808-14. doi: 10.1002/pon.4005. Epub 2015 Oct 18.
4
Moving beyond caregiver burden: identifying helpful interventions for family caregivers.超越照顾者负担:为家庭照顾者寻找有效的干预措施。
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2014 Mar;52(3):15-8. doi: 10.3928/02793695-20140128-05. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
5
The humanistic burden of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Europe: a real-world survey linking patient clinical factors to patient and caregiver burden.欧洲晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的人文负担:一项将患者临床因素与患者和照护者负担联系起来的真实世界调查。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Jul;28(7):1849-1861. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02152-6. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
6
The perceived burden among Chinese family caregivers of people with schizophrenia.中国精神分裂症患者家庭照料者的感知负担
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Jun;16(6):1151-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01501.x.
7
Psychological well-being over time among informal caregivers caring for persons with dementia living at home.长期居家照顾痴呆患者的非正式照护者的心理健康状况。
Aging Ment Health. 2017 Nov;21(11):1138-1146. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2016.1211621. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
8
Contextual or general stress outcomes: making choices through caregiving appraisals.情境性或一般性压力结果:通过照料评估做出选择。
Gerontologist. 2000 Dec;40(6):706-17. doi: 10.1093/geront/40.6.706.
9
Informal caregivers of people with an intellectual disability in England: health, quality of life and impact of caring.英国智障人士的非正式照料者:健康、生活质量及照料影响
Health Soc Care Community. 2017 May;25(3):951-961. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12393. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
10
Caregiver burden in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A systematic review.肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者照顾者负担的系统评价。
Palliat Med. 2018 Jan;32(1):231-245. doi: 10.1177/0269216317709965. Epub 2017 Jul 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the experience of informal caregivers of dependent elderly people with the well-being valuation method.运用幸福感评估方法探索依赖他人照顾的老年人的非正式照料者的经历。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 29;16:1584632. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1584632. eCollection 2025.
2
Understanding Diverse Caregiver Experiences and Their Impact on Caregiver Burden in Multiple Sclerosis.了解多发性硬化症中不同护理人员的经历及其对护理人员负担的影响。
Int J MS Care. 2025 Apr 28;27(Q2):125-133. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2024-025. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Care burden and associated factors among caregivers of patients with bipolar type I disorder.

本文引用的文献

1
Entangled in uncertainty: The experience of living with dementia from the perspective of family caregivers.纠缠于不确定之中:家庭照护者从自身视角体验痴呆症患者的生活
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 13;13(6):e0198034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198034. eCollection 2018.
2
Resilience for family carers of advanced cancer patients-how can health care providers contribute? A qualitative interview study with carers.晚期癌症患者家属的韧性——医护人员如何提供帮助?一项针对照顾者的定性访谈研究。
Palliat Med. 2018 Sep;32(8):1410-1418. doi: 10.1177/0269216318777656. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
3
Self-Compassion, Coping Strategies, and Caregiver Burden in Caregivers of People with Dementia.
双相 I 型障碍患者照顾者的照护负担及相关因素。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Sep 3;25(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02583-2.
4
Needs of Family Caregivers of People with Lower Limb Amputations: A Scoping Review.下肢截肢患者家庭照顾者的需求:一项范围综述
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Apr 15;14(4):326. doi: 10.3390/bs14040326.
5
Long-term care needs and the risk of household poverty across Europe: a comparative secondary data study.欧洲的长期护理需求与家庭贫困风险:一项比较性二次数据研究
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jan 26;24(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04687-x.
6
The relationship between social support, coping strategies and psychological distress and positive mental well-being in carers of people with borderline personality disorder.边缘型人格障碍患者照料者的社会支持、应对策略与心理困扰及积极心理健康之间的关系。
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2023 Oct 12;10(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40479-023-00237-w.
7
The association between social support provision, psychological capital, subjective well-being and sense of indebtedness among undergraduates with low socioeconomic status.社会支持提供、心理资本、主观幸福感与社会经济地位较低的本科生负债感之间的关系。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Sep 27;11(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01325-w.
8
The Clinical and Economic Impact of Employees Who Are Care Partners of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis by Disease Severity.多发性硬化症患者的护理伙伴员工按疾病严重程度划分的临床和经济影响
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2023 Apr 13;10(1):91-101. doi: 10.36469/001c.57593. eCollection 2023.
9
Effects of Childcare, Work, and Caregiving Intensity on Male and Female Family Caregivers.儿童保育、工作和照料强度对男性和女性家庭照料者的影响。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2023 May 26;78(6):959-968. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbad022.
10
Care, burden and self-described positive aspects of caring in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: an exploratory, longitudinal, mixed-methods study.肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者的护理、负担和自我描述的积极方面:一项探索性、纵向、混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 20;13(1):e064254. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064254.
自我同情、应对策略与痴呆症患者照顾者的负担。
Clin Gerontol. 2019 Jan-Feb;42(1):47-59. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2018.1461162. Epub 2018 May 3.
4
What seems to matter in public policy and the health of informal caregivers? A cross-sectional study in 12 European countries.在公共政策和非正式护工健康方面,什么似乎很重要?12 个欧洲国家的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 8;13(3):e0194232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194232. eCollection 2018.
5
Expecting the worst? The relationship between retrospective and prospective appraisals of illness on quality of life in prostate cancer survivors.预期最坏情况?回顾性和前瞻性评估疾病对前列腺癌幸存者生活质量的关系。
Psychooncology. 2018 Apr;27(4):1237-1243. doi: 10.1002/pon.4660. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
6
Communal Coping and Adjustment to Chronic Illness: Theory Update and Evidence.社区应对和慢性病调整:理论更新与证据。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2018 May;22(2):170-195. doi: 10.1177/1088868317735767. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
7
How to understand informal caregiving patterns in Europe? The role of formal long-term care provisions and family care norms.如何理解欧洲的非正规护理模式?正规长期护理规定和家庭护理规范的作用。
Scand J Public Health. 2018 Jun;46(4):436-447. doi: 10.1177/1403494817726197. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
8
Who is Taking Care of the Caregiver?谁来照顾照顾者?
J Patient Exp. 2015 May;2(1):7-12. doi: 10.1177/237437431500200103. Epub 2015 May 1.
9
Worry in Head and Neck Cancer Caregivers: The Role of Survivor Factors, Care-Related Stressors, and Loneliness in Predicting Fear of Recurrence.头颈癌患者照料者的担忧:幸存者因素、护理相关压力源及孤独感在预测复发恐惧中的作用
Nurs Res. 2017 Jul/Aug;66(4):295-303. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000223.
10
Informal care in Europe: findings from the European Social Survey (2014) special module on the social determinants of health.欧洲的非正式照料:来自欧洲社会调查(2014年)健康社会决定因素特别模块的调查结果。
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Feb 1;27(suppl_1):90-95. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw229.