School of Social Work (Wilson, Dohler) and Center for Excellence in Community Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry (Ginley), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; Department of Social Work, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth (Phillips); Department of Social Work, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia (Villodas); Center on Mindfulness and Integrative Health Intervention Development, College of Social Work, University of Utah, Salt Lake City (Parisi).
Psychiatr Serv. 2023 Oct 1;74(10):1072-1076. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20220355. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
This preliminary study tested the efficacy of an evidence-based correctional intervention (Thinking for a Change) with an adapted delivery to incarcerated people with mental illness.
A small-scale randomized controlled trial (N=47 men) was conducted. Outcomes were changes in aggression, number of behavioral infractions, and days in administrative segregation. Treatment targets were impulsivity, interpersonal problem-solving skills, and attitudes supportive of crime. Linear mixed-effects models were used to examine within-person and between-group differences over time, and nonparametric tests were used to examine between-group differences in criminal legal outcomes postintervention.
Statistically significant within-person differences were found for all treatment targets and for one study outcome (aggression). Statistically significant differences in impulsivity were found between the experimental and control groups (B=-7.10, p=0.02).
Existing evidence-based correctional interventions can affect the lives of people with mental illness. Accelerated research in this area may benefit people with mental illness at high risk for criminal legal system involvement.
本初步研究测试了一种基于证据的矫正干预措施(思维改变)的疗效,该干预措施针对的是患有精神疾病的监禁人员,并进行了适应性调整。
进行了一项小规模的随机对照试验(N=47 名男性)。结果是攻击性、行为违规次数和行政隔离天数的变化。治疗目标是冲动性、人际问题解决技能和支持犯罪的态度。线性混合效应模型用于检查随时间的个体内和组间差异,非参数检验用于检查干预后犯罪法律结果的组间差异。
所有治疗目标和一个研究结果(攻击性)都存在统计学上显著的个体内差异。实验组和对照组之间在冲动性方面存在统计学显著差异(B=-7.10,p=0.02)。
现有的基于证据的矫正干预措施可能会影响精神病患者的生活。该领域的加速研究可能会使那些有较高刑事法律系统介入风险的精神病患者受益。