From the Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Burns, and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
J Am Coll Surg. 2023 Jul 1;237(1):24-34. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000715. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
Whole blood (WB) is becoming the preferred product for the resuscitation of hemorrhaging trauma patients. However, there is a lack of data on the optimum timing of receiving WB. We aimed to assess the effect of time to WB transfusion on the outcomes of trauma patients.
The American College of Surgeons TQIP 2017 to 2019 database was analyzed. Adult trauma patients who received at least 1 unit of WB within the first 2 hours of admission were included. Patients were stratified by time to first unit of WB transfusion (first 30 minutes, second 30 minutes, and second hour). Primary outcomes were 24-hour and in-hospital mortality, adjusting for potential confounders.
A total of 1,952 patients were identified. Mean age and systolic blood pressure were 42 ± 18 years and 101 ± 35 mmHg, respectively. Median Injury Severity Score was 17 [10 to 26], and all groups had comparable injury severities (p = 0.27). Overall, 24-hour and in-hospital mortality rates were 14% and 19%, respectively. Transfusion of WB after 30 minutes was progressively associated with increased adjusted odds of 24-hour mortality (second 30 minutes: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.07, p = 0.015; second hour: aOR 2.39, p = 0.010) and in-hospital mortality (second 30 minutes: aOR 1.79, p = 0.025; second hour: aOR 1.98, p = 0.018). On subanalysis of patients with an admission shock index >1, every 30-minute delay in WB transfusion was associated with higher odds of 24-hour (aOR 1.23, p = 0.019) and in-hospital (aOR 1.18, p = 0.033) mortality.
Every minute delay in WB transfusion is associated with a 2% increase in odds of 24-hour and in-hospital mortality among hemorrhaging trauma patients. WB should be readily available and easily accessible in the trauma bay for the early resuscitation of hemorrhaging patients.
全血(WB)正在成为出血性创伤患者复苏的首选产品。然而,关于接受 WB 的最佳时间尚缺乏数据。我们旨在评估 WB 输血时间对创伤患者结局的影响。
分析了美国外科医师学院 TQIP 2017 年至 2019 年的数据库。纳入至少在入院后 2 小时内接受 1 单位以上 WB 的成年创伤患者。根据首次输注 WB 的时间(前 30 分钟、后 30 分钟和第 2 小时)将患者分层。主要结局为 24 小时和住院死亡率,调整潜在混杂因素。
共纳入 1952 例患者。平均年龄和收缩压分别为 42±18 岁和 101±35mmHg。中位损伤严重程度评分 17[10-26],各组损伤严重程度相当(p=0.27)。总体而言,24 小时和住院死亡率分别为 14%和 19%。输注 WB 超过 30 分钟与调整后的 24 小时死亡率增加相关(后 30 分钟:调整后比值比[aOR]2.07,p=0.015;第 2 小时:aOR 2.39,p=0.010)和住院死亡率(后 30 分钟:aOR 1.79,p=0.025;第 2 小时:aOR 1.98,p=0.018)。在入院休克指数>1 的患者的亚分析中,每延迟 30 分钟输注 WB 与 24 小时(aOR 1.23,p=0.019)和住院(aOR 1.18,p=0.033)死亡率升高相关。
WB 输注每延迟 1 分钟,出血性创伤患者 24 小时和住院死亡率的几率就增加 2%。WB 应在创伤区随时可用并易于获取,以便对出血患者进行早期复苏。