Suppr超能文献

预测出血性创伤患者的关键给药阈值。

Predicting the critical administration threshold in bleeding trauma patients.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Department of Critical Care, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

出版信息

CJEM. 2024 Nov;26(11):790-796. doi: 10.1007/s43678-024-00776-3. Epub 2024 Sep 30.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Delays in promptly recognizing and appropriately managing hemorrhagic injuries contribute to preventable trauma related deaths nationwide. We sought to identify patient variables available at the time of emergency department arrival associated with meeting the critical administration threshold.

METHODOLOGY

We conducted a trauma registry review from September 2016 to March 2020 of trauma team activations at The Ottawa Hospital, a Level 1 Trauma Center. Our primary outcome was the frequency of meeting the critical administration threshold. Secondary outcomes included time to critical administration threshold, 24-h all-cause mortality, and 30-day all-cause mortality. Multivariate logistic regression identified factors independently associated with meeting the critical administration threshold.

RESULTS

We assessed 762 patients, of which 78 (10.2%) met the critical administration threshold. The median time to critical administration threshold was 28.9 min. Mortality at 24 h occurred in 58 (7.6%) patients. Four variables available upon patient arrival predicted the critical administration threshold, including systolic blood pressure ≤ 90 mmHg (OR 6.6; 95% CI 3.7-12.0), Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 8 (OR 5.9; 95% CI 3.2-10.6), heart rate ≥ 100 beats/minute (OR 4.4; 95% CI 2.4-8.1), and respiratory rate ≥ 20 breaths/min (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.2-4.0).

CONCLUSION

We identified four clinical variables readily available to physicians upon patient arrival associated with meeting the critical administration threshold: systolic blood pressure ≤ 90 mmHg, Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 8, heart rate ≥ 100 beats/minute, and respiratory rate ≥ 20 breaths/min. Patients presenting with any of these clinical parameters should prompt physicians to consider ordering blood products immediately.

摘要

简介

在全国范围内,及时识别和妥善处理出血性损伤方面的延误导致可预防的创伤相关死亡。我们试图确定急诊科到达时与达到关键管理阈值相关的患者变量。

方法

我们对 2016 年 9 月至 2020 年 3 月期间渥太华医院创伤小组激活的创伤登记进行了回顾。我们的主要结局是达到关键管理阈值的频率。次要结局包括达到关键管理阈值的时间、24 小时全因死亡率和 30 天全因死亡率。多变量逻辑回归确定了与达到关键管理阈值独立相关的因素。

结果

我们评估了 762 名患者,其中 78 名(10.2%)达到了关键管理阈值。达到关键管理阈值的中位时间为 28.9 分钟。24 小时内死亡率为 58 例(7.6%)。患者到达时的四个变量可预测关键管理阈值,包括收缩压≤90mmHg(OR 6.6;95%CI 3.7-12.0)、格拉斯哥昏迷评分≤8(OR 5.9;95%CI 3.2-10.6)、心率≥100 次/分钟(OR 4.4;95%CI 2.4-8.1)和呼吸频率≥20 次/分钟(OR 2.2;95%CI 1.2-4.0)。

结论

我们确定了四个在患者到达时可迅速提供给医生的临床变量,与达到关键管理阈值相关:收缩压≤90mmHg、格拉斯哥昏迷评分≤8、心率≥100 次/分钟和呼吸频率≥20 次/分钟。任何这些临床参数的患者都应促使医生立即考虑下订单血制品。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验