• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测出血性创伤患者的关键给药阈值。

Predicting the critical administration threshold in bleeding trauma patients.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Department of Critical Care, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

出版信息

CJEM. 2024 Nov;26(11):790-796. doi: 10.1007/s43678-024-00776-3. Epub 2024 Sep 30.

DOI:10.1007/s43678-024-00776-3
PMID:39343847
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Delays in promptly recognizing and appropriately managing hemorrhagic injuries contribute to preventable trauma related deaths nationwide. We sought to identify patient variables available at the time of emergency department arrival associated with meeting the critical administration threshold.

METHODOLOGY

We conducted a trauma registry review from September 2016 to March 2020 of trauma team activations at The Ottawa Hospital, a Level 1 Trauma Center. Our primary outcome was the frequency of meeting the critical administration threshold. Secondary outcomes included time to critical administration threshold, 24-h all-cause mortality, and 30-day all-cause mortality. Multivariate logistic regression identified factors independently associated with meeting the critical administration threshold.

RESULTS

We assessed 762 patients, of which 78 (10.2%) met the critical administration threshold. The median time to critical administration threshold was 28.9 min. Mortality at 24 h occurred in 58 (7.6%) patients. Four variables available upon patient arrival predicted the critical administration threshold, including systolic blood pressure ≤ 90 mmHg (OR 6.6; 95% CI 3.7-12.0), Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 8 (OR 5.9; 95% CI 3.2-10.6), heart rate ≥ 100 beats/minute (OR 4.4; 95% CI 2.4-8.1), and respiratory rate ≥ 20 breaths/min (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.2-4.0).

CONCLUSION

We identified four clinical variables readily available to physicians upon patient arrival associated with meeting the critical administration threshold: systolic blood pressure ≤ 90 mmHg, Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 8, heart rate ≥ 100 beats/minute, and respiratory rate ≥ 20 breaths/min. Patients presenting with any of these clinical parameters should prompt physicians to consider ordering blood products immediately.

摘要

简介

在全国范围内,及时识别和妥善处理出血性损伤方面的延误导致可预防的创伤相关死亡。我们试图确定急诊科到达时与达到关键管理阈值相关的患者变量。

方法

我们对 2016 年 9 月至 2020 年 3 月期间渥太华医院创伤小组激活的创伤登记进行了回顾。我们的主要结局是达到关键管理阈值的频率。次要结局包括达到关键管理阈值的时间、24 小时全因死亡率和 30 天全因死亡率。多变量逻辑回归确定了与达到关键管理阈值独立相关的因素。

结果

我们评估了 762 名患者,其中 78 名(10.2%)达到了关键管理阈值。达到关键管理阈值的中位时间为 28.9 分钟。24 小时内死亡率为 58 例(7.6%)。患者到达时的四个变量可预测关键管理阈值,包括收缩压≤90mmHg(OR 6.6;95%CI 3.7-12.0)、格拉斯哥昏迷评分≤8(OR 5.9;95%CI 3.2-10.6)、心率≥100 次/分钟(OR 4.4;95%CI 2.4-8.1)和呼吸频率≥20 次/分钟(OR 2.2;95%CI 1.2-4.0)。

结论

我们确定了四个在患者到达时可迅速提供给医生的临床变量,与达到关键管理阈值相关:收缩压≤90mmHg、格拉斯哥昏迷评分≤8、心率≥100 次/分钟和呼吸频率≥20 次/分钟。任何这些临床参数的患者都应促使医生立即考虑下订单血制品。

相似文献

1
Predicting the critical administration threshold in bleeding trauma patients.预测出血性创伤患者的关键给药阈值。
CJEM. 2024 Nov;26(11):790-796. doi: 10.1007/s43678-024-00776-3. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
2
ATLS practices and survival at rural level III trauma hospitals, 1995-1999.1995 - 1999年农村三级创伤医院的高级创伤生命支持实践与生存率
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2002 Jul-Sep;6(3):299-305. doi: 10.1080/10903120290938337.
3
Delayed trauma team activation: patient characteristics and outcomes.延迟创伤团队激活:患者特征和结局。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Sep;73(3):695-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31825abf6f.
4
Preventable and potentially preventable deaths in severely injured elderly patients: a single-center retrospective data analysis of a German trauma center.重伤老年患者中可预防和潜在可预防的死亡:德国一家创伤中心的单中心回顾性数据分析
World J Surg. 2014 Dec;38(12):3125-32. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2755-0.
5
Outcomes after ultramassive transfusion in the modern era: An Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter study.现代超大容量输血后的结局:东部创伤外科学会多中心研究。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Jul 1;91(1):24-33. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003121.
6
Revised trauma scoring system to predict in-hospital mortality in the emergency department: Glasgow Coma Scale, Age, and Systolic Blood Pressure score.改良创伤评分系统预测急诊科住院病死率:格拉斯哥昏迷评分、年龄和收缩压评分。
Crit Care. 2011 Aug 10;15(4):R191. doi: 10.1186/cc10348.
7
Trends in 1029 trauma deaths at a level 1 trauma center: Impact of a bleeding control bundle of care.一级创伤中心1029例创伤死亡病例的趋势:出血控制综合护理措施的影响
Injury. 2017 Jan;48(1):5-12. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.10.037. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
8
Is there an association between female gender and outcome in severe trauma? A multi-center analysis in the Netherlands.女性性别与严重创伤结局之间是否存在关联?荷兰多中心分析。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Feb 13;27(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0589-3.
9
Accuracy of massive transfusion as a surrogate for significant traumatic bleeding in health administrative datasets.在卫生管理数据集中,大量输血作为严重创伤性出血替代指标的准确性。
Injury. 2019 Feb;50(2):318-323. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.11.014. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
10
Evaluation of massive transfusion protocol practices by type of trauma at a level I trauma center.在一级创伤中心按创伤类型评估大量输血方案的实施情况。
Chin J Traumatol. 2018 Oct;21(5):261-266. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Apr 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Time to Whole Blood Transfusion in Hemorrhaging Civilian Trauma Patients: There Is Always Room for Improvement.出血性平民创伤患者的全血输注时间:仍有改进空间。
J Am Coll Surg. 2023 Jul 1;237(1):24-34. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000715. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
2
Massive Hemorrhage Protocol: A Practical Approach to the Bleeding Trauma Patient.大出血预案:创伤性出血患者的实用处理方法。
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2023 Feb;41(1):51-69. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2022.09.010.
3
Current practices and challenges in assessing traumatic hemorrhage: An international survey of trauma care providers.
评估创伤性出血的当前实践与挑战:一项针对创伤护理提供者的国际调查。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 May 1;90(5):e95-e100. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003081.
4
Multicenter Validation of the Revised Assessment of Bleeding and Transfusion (RABT) Score for Predicting Massive Transfusion.多中心验证改良的出血与输血评估(RABT)评分对预测大量输血的价值。
World J Surg. 2020 Jun;44(6):1807-1816. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05394-5.
5
Prognostic Accuracy of Massive Transfusion, Critical Administration Threshold, and Resuscitation Intensity in Assessing Mortality in Traumatic Patients with Severe Hemorrhage: a Meta-Analysis.大量输血、关键管理阈值和复苏强度预测严重出血创伤患者死亡率的准确性:荟萃分析。
J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Dec 30;34(50):e318. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e318.
6
Inferior Vena Cava Volume Is an Independent Predictor of Massive Transfusion in Patients With Trauma.下腔静脉容量是创伤患者大量输血的独立预测指标。
J Intensive Care Med. 2021 Apr;36(4):428-435. doi: 10.1177/0885066619894556. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
7
Fibrinogen level on admission is a predictive marker of the need for massive blood transfusion after pelvic fracture.入院时的纤维蛋白原水平是预测骨盆骨折后大量输血需求的指标。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Apr;38(4):789-793. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.06.043. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
8
Accuracy of massive transfusion as a surrogate for significant traumatic bleeding in health administrative datasets.在卫生管理数据集中,大量输血作为严重创伤性出血替代指标的准确性。
Injury. 2019 Feb;50(2):318-323. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.11.014. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
9
Early identification of patients requiring massive transfusion, embolization or hemostatic surgery for traumatic hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.创伤性出血患者需要大量输血、栓塞或止血手术的早期识别:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Mar;84(3):505-516. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001760.
10
Every minute counts: Time to delivery of initial massive transfusion cooler and its impact on mortality.分秒必争:首次大量输血冷却器的交付时间及其对死亡率的影响。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Jul;83(1):19-24. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001531.