Suppr超能文献

巨乳症与乳房缩小术:术后 5 年门诊护理成本和阿片类药物消耗分析。

Macromastia and Reduction Mammaplasty: Analysis of Outpatient Cost of Care and Opioid Consumption at 5 Years Postoperatively.

出版信息

Aesthet Surg J. 2023 Sep 14;43(10):NP763-NP770. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjad107.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Macromastia is associated with increased opioid consumption, which could potentially be the initial exposure for patients with an opioid use disorder amid an escalating opioid crisis in the United States.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate outpatient cost of care and opioid consumption in patients with macromastia and compare those who underwent reduction mammaplasty vs those who did not have surgery.

METHODS

PearlDiver, a database encompassing a national cohort of private payers with 153 million unique patients, was queried. The study cohort included patients diagnosed with macromastia who did or did not undergo reduction mammaplasty utilizing both ICD-9 and ICD-10 and CPT codes. Outpatient cost of care and morphine milligram equivalents (MME) were calculated up to 5 years postoperatively for both cohorts.

RESULTS

At 1 to 3 years postoperatively, there was no statistically significant difference in outpatient cost of care between cohorts. At every follow-up thereafter, outpatient cost of care was higher among macromastia patients who did not undergo reduction mammaplasty, with cohort differences of US$240.68 and US$349.90 at 4 years and 5 years, respectively (P < .05). MME consumption was greater in patients who underwent reduction mammaplasty up to 30 days postoperatively (P < .01). Beyond that, there was no significant difference in MME consumption between cohorts. However, patients who did not undergo surgery had opioid consumption levels above 50 MME/day until 3 years after diagnosis of macromastia.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with macromastia who undergo reduction mammaplasty have lower outpatient care costs than patients who do not undergo reduction mammaplasty, with safer long-term opioid consumption in alignment with current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines.

摘要

背景

巨乳症与阿片类药物消耗增加有关,在美国阿片类药物危机不断升级的情况下,这可能是阿片类药物使用障碍患者最初接触阿片类药物的原因。

目的

本研究旨在评估巨乳症患者的门诊护理费用和阿片类药物的使用情况,并比较接受乳房缩小术与未接受手术的患者。

方法

利用 ICD-9 和 ICD-10 以及 CPT 代码,在包含 1.53 亿名独特患者的私人支付者全国队列的 PearlDiver 数据库中进行查询。研究队列包括被诊断为巨乳症且接受或未接受乳房缩小术的患者。对两组患者的门诊护理费用和吗啡毫克当量(MME)进行了长达 5 年的术后计算。

结果

在术后 1 至 3 年,两组患者的门诊护理费用无统计学差异。此后的每次随访中,未接受乳房缩小术的巨乳症患者的门诊护理费用更高,分别在第 4 年和第 5 年高出 240.68 美元和 349.90 美元(P<.05)。接受乳房缩小术的患者在术后 30 天内 MME 的使用量更大(P<.01)。在此之后,两组患者的 MME 使用量无显著差异。然而,未接受手术的患者在巨乳症诊断后 3 年内,其阿片类药物的使用量仍超过 50 MME/天。

结论

接受乳房缩小术的巨乳症患者的门诊护理费用低于未接受乳房缩小术的患者,并且长期阿片类药物的使用更安全,符合美国疾病控制与预防中心的现行指南。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验