de Silva M, Kyle V, Hazleman B, Salisbury R, Page Thomas P, Wraight P
Ann Rheum Dis. 1986 Apr;45(4):277-80. doi: 10.1136/ard.45.4.277.
Standard clinical methods of assessing joint inflammation are being supplemented increasingly by radioisotopic and thermographic studies. However, the correlation between these different methods has not been firmly established. In the quantification of synovitis by infrared thermography we have shown that the heat distribution index (HDI) based on thermal pattern is more reliable and is less affected by diurnal variations in joint temperature than the commonly used thermographic index, which is based on average skin temperature values. In 20 patients with rheumatoid arthritis whose knees were being treated with intra-articular steroid we obtained 184 serial paired observations over a period of 24 weeks for clinical assessment, HDI, and 99mTc pertechnetate uptake. We found significant correlations (p less than 0.001) between the three methods of assessment (except for pain and HDI (p = 0.116)).
评估关节炎症的标准临床方法正越来越多地通过放射性同位素和热成像研究得到补充。然而,这些不同方法之间的相关性尚未得到确凿确立。在通过红外热成像对滑膜炎进行量化时,我们已经表明,基于热模式的热分布指数(HDI)比常用的基于平均皮肤温度值的热成像指数更可靠,并且受关节温度日变化的影响更小。在20例接受关节内类固醇治疗的类风湿性关节炎患者中,我们在24周的时间内对临床评估、HDI和高锝[99mTc]酸盐摄取进行了184次连续配对观察。我们发现三种评估方法之间存在显著相关性(p小于0.001)(疼痛与HDI除外(p = 0.116))。