• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于 POP 手术的 PFDI-20 和 POPDI-6 的最小有意义差异和患者可接受症状状态。

Minimal important difference and patient acceptable symptom state for PFDI-20 and POPDI-6 in POP surgery.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Central Finland Central Hospital, Keskussairaalantie 19, 40620, Jyväskylä, Finland.

University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Dec;32(12):3169-3176. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04513-z. Epub 2020 Sep 2.

DOI:10.1007/s00192-020-04513-z
PMID:32876715
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8642346/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Patient-reported outcome measures are fundamental tools when assessing effectiveness of treatments. The challenge lies in the interpretation: which magnitude of change in score is meaningful for the patients? The minimal important difference (MID) is defined as the smallest difference in score that patients perceive as important. The Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) represents the value of score beyond which patients consider themselves well. We aimed to determine the MID and PASS for Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20) and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory-6 (POPDI-6) in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery.

METHODS

We used data from 2704 POP surgeries from a prospective, population-based cohort. MID was determined with three anchor-based and one distribution-based method. PASS was defined using two different methods. Medians of the estimates were identified.

RESULTS

The MID estimates with (1) mean change, (2) receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve, (3) 75th percentile, and (4) distribution-based method varied between 22.9-25.0 (median 24.2) points for PFDI-20 and 9.0-12.5 (median 11.3) for POPDI-6. The PASS cutoffs with (1) 75th percentile and (2) ROC curve method varied between 57.7-62.5 (median 60.0) for PFDI-20 and 16.7-17.7 (median 17.2) for POPDI-6.

CONCLUSION

A mean difference of 24 points in the PFDI-20 or 11 points in the POPDI-6 can be used as a clinically relevant difference between groups. Postoperative scores ≤ 60 for PFDI-20 and ≤ 17 for POPDI-6 signify acceptable symptom state.

摘要

简介和假设

患者报告的结局测量是评估治疗效果的基本工具。挑战在于解释:分数的变化幅度对患者有多大意义?最小有意义差异(MID)定义为患者认为重要的最小分数差异。患者可接受的症状状态(PASS)表示患者认为自己状态良好的分数值。我们旨在确定盆腔器官脱垂(POP)手术中盆腔底部不适量表 20 项(PFDI-20)和盆腔器官脱垂困扰量表 6 项(POPDI-6)的 MID 和 PASS。

方法

我们使用了来自前瞻性、基于人群队列的 2704 例 POP 手术的数据。使用三种基于锚定的方法和一种基于分布的方法确定 MID。使用两种不同的方法定义 PASS。确定估计值的中位数。

结果

PFDI-20 的 MID 估计值(1)平均变化、(2)接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线、(3)第 75 百分位数和(4)基于分布的方法分别为 22.9-25.0(中位数 24.2)点,POPDI-6 的 MID 估计值为 9.0-12.5(中位数 11.3)点。PFDI-20 的 PASS 截断值(1)第 75 百分位数和(2)ROC 曲线方法分别为 57.7-62.5(中位数 60.0)点,POPDI-6 的 PASS 截断值为 16.7-17.7(中位数 17.2)点。

结论

PFDI-20 中 24 分或 POPDI-6 中 11 分的平均差异可作为组间的临床相关差异。PFDI-20 术后评分≤60 分和 POPDI-6 术后评分≤17 分表示可接受的症状状态。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ad6/8642346/ced1cf7d9001/192_2020_4513_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ad6/8642346/ced1cf7d9001/192_2020_4513_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ad6/8642346/ced1cf7d9001/192_2020_4513_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Minimal important difference and patient acceptable symptom state for PFDI-20 and POPDI-6 in POP surgery.用于 POP 手术的 PFDI-20 和 POPDI-6 的最小有意义差异和患者可接受症状状态。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Dec;32(12):3169-3176. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04513-z. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
2
Responsiveness of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire in women undergoing treatment for pelvic floor disorders.盆底功能障碍治疗女性中盆底困扰量表和盆底功能影响问卷的反应性
Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Feb;24(2):213-21. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1827-7. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
3
Agreement between patient global impression scale of improvement, pelvic floor distress inventory and 15D in measuring the outcome of pelvic organ prolapse surgery.患者总体改善印象量表、盆底功能障碍量表与15D量表在评估盆腔器官脱垂手术疗效方面的一致性。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2020 Nov;39(8):2171-2178. doi: 10.1002/nau.24467. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
4
Is the Visual Analogue Scale inferior to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory for assessing symptom bother of pelvic organ prolapse?视觉模拟评分法在评估盆腔器官脱垂症状困扰方面不如盆腔器官脱垂困扰问卷吗?
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Dec;61(6):918-921. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13412. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
5
Relationship between the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POP-Q), the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), and the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) before and after anterior vaginal wall prolapse surgery.阴道前壁脱垂手术前后盆腔器官脱垂量化系统(POP-Q)、盆底影响问卷(PFIQ-7)和盆底困扰量表(PFDI-20)之间的关系
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Feb;26(2):195-200. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2434-6. Epub 2014 May 28.
6
A generic health-related quality of life instrument for assessing pelvic organ prolapse surgery: correlation with condition-specific outcome measures.一种用于评估盆腔器官脱垂手术的通用健康相关生活质量工具:与特定病情结局指标的相关性。
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Aug;29(8):1093-1099. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3587-5. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
7
Minimal important change in the pelvic floor distress inventory-20 among women opting for conservative prolapse treatment.选择保守性子宫脱垂治疗的女性盆底功能障碍量表-20的最小重要变化。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;216(4):397.e1-397.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.10.010. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
8
Turkish adaptation of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score and its validity and reliability.盆腔器官脱垂症状评分的土耳其语改编版及其有效性和可靠性。
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Aug;28(8):1217-1222. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3251-x. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
9
Validation of the short forms of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20), Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) in Finnish.盆底功能障碍性疾病问卷简表(PFDI - 20)、盆底功能影响问卷简表(PFIQ - 7)及盆腔器官脱垂/尿失禁性功能问卷简表(PISQ - 12)芬兰语版本的效度验证
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 May 2;15(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0648-2.
10
Responsiveness of the Spanish Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaires Short Forms (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7) in women with pelvic floor disorders.西班牙盆底困扰量表和盆底影响问卷简表(PFDI-20和PFIQ-7)在盆底功能障碍女性中的反应性。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Jul;190:20-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.03.029. Epub 2015 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Norwegian Translation and Validation of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-IUGA Revised (PISQ-IR).《盆腔器官脱垂/尿失禁性功能问卷-国际尿控协会修订版(PISQ-IR)》的挪威语翻译与验证
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Mar 19. doi: 10.1007/s00192-025-06106-0.
2
Impact of a Digital Therapeutic Device on Pelvic Floor Symptoms.数字治疗设备对盆底症状的影响。
Urogynecology (Phila). 2025 Mar 17;31(5):528-34. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001674.
3
Silicone Irregular Hexagon Pessary Versus Polyvinyl Chloride Ring Pessary for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Randomised Controlled Trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the credibility of anchor based estimates of minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes: instrument development and reliability study.评估基于锚点的患者报告结局最小重要差异估计值的可信度:仪器开发和可靠性研究。
BMJ. 2020 Jun 4;369:m1714. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1714.
2
Methods of surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in a nationwide cohort (FINPOP 2015).全国队列研究中盆腔器官脱垂的手术方法(FINPOP 2015)。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Apr;98(4):451-459. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13520. Epub 2019 Feb 3.
3
Minimum clinically important differences in chronic pain vary considerably by baseline pain and methodological factors: systematic review of empirical studies.
硅胶不规则六边形子宫托与聚氯乙烯环形子宫托治疗盆腔器官脱垂的随机对照试验
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Feb;36(2):289-298. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05933-x. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
4
Sexual and Urinary Health among Women following Bariatric Surgery.女性减重手术后的性与泌尿健康
Obes Surg. 2024 Nov;34(11):4146-4151. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07226-0. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
5
A Study on Symptoms of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction in Assigned Female at Birth Patients Diagnosed with Gender Dysphoria Undergoing Vaginectomy.一项关于诊断为性别焦虑症且正在接受阴道切除术的出生时被指定为女性的患者盆底功能障碍症状的研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Jul 2;12(7):e5950. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005950. eCollection 2024 Jul.
6
Measuring Pelvic Organ Prolapse: An Evolution.测量盆腔器官脱垂:演进。
Int Urogynecol J. 2024 May;35(5):967-976. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05798-0. Epub 2024 May 10.
7
International urogynecological consultation chapter 4.1: definition of outcomes for pelvic organ prolapse surgery.国际泌尿妇科咨询第 4.1 章:盆腔器官脱垂手术结局的定义。
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Nov;34(11):2689-2699. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05660-9. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
8
Quality-of-life improvements in patients after various surgical treatments for pelvic organ prolapse.各种手术治疗盆腔器官脱垂后患者生活质量的改善。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Mar;309(3):813-820. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07140-3. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
9
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Use in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review.用于盆腔器官脱垂女性的患者报告结局测量指标:系统评价。
Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jun 1;141(6):1098-1114. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005212. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
10
How is pain associated with pelvic mesh implants measured? Refinement of the construct and a scoping review of current assessment tools.如何衡量与骨盆网片植入物相关的疼痛?构建的精细化和当前评估工具的范围综述。
BMC Womens Health. 2022 Sep 30;22(1):396. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01977-7.
慢性疼痛的最小临床重要差异因基线疼痛和方法学因素而异:系统评价实证研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Sep;101:87-106.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 May 21.
4
Validation of the short forms of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20), Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) in Finnish.盆底功能障碍性疾病问卷简表(PFDI - 20)、盆底功能影响问卷简表(PFIQ - 7)及盆腔器官脱垂/尿失禁性功能问卷简表(PISQ - 12)芬兰语版本的效度验证
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 May 2;15(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0648-2.
5
Minimal important change in the pelvic floor distress inventory-20 among women opting for conservative prolapse treatment.选择保守性子宫脱垂治疗的女性盆底功能障碍量表-20的最小重要变化。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;216(4):397.e1-397.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.10.010. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
6
Minimally important difference estimates and methods: a protocol.最小重要差异估计与方法:一项方案。
BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 1;5(10):e007953. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007953.
7
Discrepancies between patient-reported outcome measures when assessing urinary incontinence or pelvic-prolapse surgery.评估尿失禁或盆腔器官脱垂手术时患者报告的结局指标之间的差异。
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Apr;27(4):537-43. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2840-4. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
8
Validation of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) in a Dutch population.盆底功能障碍性疾病问卷(PFDI - 20)和盆底功能障碍影响问卷(PFIQ - 7)在荷兰人群中的效度验证。
Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Apr;25(4):531-44. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2263-z. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
9
Determination and comparison of the smallest detectable change (SDC) and the minimal important change (MIC) of four-shoulder patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).四种肩袖患者报告结局测量(PROMs)的最小可检测变化(SDC)和最小有意义变化(MIC)的测定和比较。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2013 Nov 14;8:40. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-8-40.
10
Psychometric evaluation of health-related quality-of-life measures after pelvic organ prolapse surgery.盆腔器官脱垂手术后健康相关生活质量测量的心理测量评估
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012 Jul-Aug;18(4):221-6. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e31825e6707.