• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Matched and self-reported loudness of tinnitus: methods and sources of error.

作者信息

Jakes S C, Hallam R S, Chambers C C, Hinchcliffe R

出版信息

Audiology. 1986;25(2):92-100. doi: 10.3109/00206098609078374.

DOI:10.3109/00206098609078374
PMID:3707441
Abstract

A consecutive series of 62 patients who reported tinnitus at the time of their first attendance at a neuro-otology clinic were studied. Loudness matches were obtained both at the frequency of the tinnitus and at 1 kHz. These matches were expressed in dB HL, dB SL and in units derived from individualised loudness functions (personal loudness units; PLUs). Self-reports of the loudness of tinnitus at the time of loudness matching were obtained on five different scales. Moderate correlations were found between self-reported loudness and some of the scales by which the loudness match was expressed. When subjects who had some difficulty with the test procedures were excluded, the correlations between PLU expressions of the matched loudness and certain of the self-report scales were found to be markedly improved. Correlations of traditional expressions of matched loudness with self-report improved to a limited extent. It was concluded that: measurement error can appreciably reduce the maximum correlation between the best self-report measure and loudness match measures; PLU conversions of matched loudness data produce the highest correlations with self-report measures of loudness, and explicitly labelled self-report scales (Guttman and adjectival) produce better correlations with loudness match values than other self-report scales.

摘要

相似文献

1
Matched and self-reported loudness of tinnitus: methods and sources of error.
Audiology. 1986;25(2):92-100. doi: 10.3109/00206098609078374.
2
A comparison of different methods for assessing the 'intensity' of tinnitus.评估耳鸣“强度”的不同方法比较
Acta Otolaryngol. 1985 May-Jun;99(5-6):501-8. doi: 10.3109/00016488509182253.
3
Pulsed versus continuous tones for evaluating the loudness of tinnitus.用于评估耳鸣响度的脉冲音与持续音
J Am Acad Audiol. 1999 May;10(5):261-72.
4
The determination of tinnitus loudness considering the effects of recruitment.考虑重振效应的耳鸣响度测定
J Speech Hear Res. 1983 Mar;26(1):59-72. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2601.59.
5
Auditory test result characteristics of subjects with and without tinnitus.有耳鸣和无耳鸣受试者的听力测试结果特征。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;46(5):619-32. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2008.11.0157.
6
Estimation of the loudness of tinnitus from matching tests.通过匹配测试评估耳鸣响度。
Br J Audiol. 1992 Dec;26(6):387-95. doi: 10.3109/03005369209076663.
7
Relationship Between Tinnitus Loudness Measure by Visual Analogue Scale and Psychoacoustic Matching of Tinnitus Loudness.耳鸣响度的视觉模拟量表测量值与耳鸣响度的心理声学匹配之间的关系。
Otol Neurotol. 2019 Jan;40(1):16-21. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002070.
8
The superiority of the Goodwin procedure over the traditional procedure in measuring the loudness level of tinnitus.在测量耳鸣响度水平方面,古德温程序相较于传统程序的优越性。
Ear Hear. 1989 Oct;10(5):318-22. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198910000-00008.
9
Computer-automated tinnitus assessment: noise-band matching, maskability, and residual inhibition.计算机自动耳鸣评估:噪声频段匹配、可掩蔽性和残余抑制。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2013 Jun;24(6):486-504. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.24.6.5.
10
Perception Versus Reaction: Comparison of Tinnitus Psychoacoustic Measures and Tinnitus Functional Index Scores.感知与反应:耳鸣心理声学测量与耳鸣功能指数评分的比较
Am J Audiol. 2019 Apr 22;28(1S):174-180. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJA-TTR17-18-0041.

引用本文的文献

1
What Tinnitus Therapy Outcome Measures Are Important for Patients?- A Discrete Choice Experiment.哪些耳鸣治疗结果指标对患者很重要?——一项离散选择实验
Front Neurol. 2021 May 25;12:668880. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.668880. eCollection 2021.
2
Principles and Methods for Psychoacoustic Evaluation of Tinnitus.耳鸣的心理声学评估的原理和方法。
Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2021;51:419-459. doi: 10.1007/7854_2020_211.
3
Multisensory attention training for treatment of tinnitus.用于治疗耳鸣的多感官注意力训练
Sci Rep. 2015 May 28;5:10802. doi: 10.1038/srep10802.
4
Tinnitus what and where: an ecological framework.耳鸣是什么以及发生在哪里:一个生态学框架。
Front Neurol. 2014 Dec 15;5:271. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00271. eCollection 2014.
5
Treatment of tinnitus: Consider psychological aspects.耳鸣的治疗:考虑心理因素。
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001 Jan;53(1):85. doi: 10.1007/BF02910992.
6
An adaptation level theory of tinnitus audibility.耳鸣可听度的适应水平理论。
Front Syst Neurosci. 2012 Jun 13;6:46. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2012.00046. eCollection 2012.
7
Assessing audiological, pathophysiological, and psychological variables in chronic tinnitus: a study of reliability and search for prognostic factors.
Int J Behav Med. 1999;6(4):312-30. doi: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0604_2.
8
A multiple-baseline evaluation of the treatment of subjective tinnitus with relaxation training and biofeedback.
Biofeedback Self Regul. 1987 Dec;12(4):295-312. doi: 10.1007/BF00998721.