• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考虑重振效应的耳鸣响度测定

The determination of tinnitus loudness considering the effects of recruitment.

作者信息

Tyler R S, Conrad-Armes D

出版信息

J Speech Hear Res. 1983 Mar;26(1):59-72. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2601.59.

DOI:10.1044/jshr.2601.59
PMID:6865383
Abstract

We have attempted to determine a meaningful measure of tinnitus loudness that considers loudness recruitment. Sixteen subjects with sensorineural tinnitus adjusted the level of a pure tone so that it was (a) at threshold, (b) equal in loudness to the tinnitus, and (c) uncomfortably loud. The pure-tone frequency was (a) at the frequency of the tinnitus pitch, and (b) at the octave frequency between 500 and 4000 Hz having the pure-tone threshold closest to 0 dB HL. In addition, the subjects adjusted the level of a broadband noise so that it (a) was at threshold, (b) just masked the tinnitus, and (c) was uncomfortably loud. These measurements were performed both in the ear ipsilateral and in the ear contralateral to the tinnitus. Formulae based on abnormal loudness functions and uncomfortable loudness levels are presented that convert equal-loudness matches in dB sensation level (SL) into loudness in sones. The level of broadband noise (in dB SL) required to mask tinnitus was about the same in the ipsilateral and in the contralateral ear for most of our subjects, regardless of the ear in which the tinnitus was localized. This noise level (in dB SL) required to mask the tinnitus correlated well with the level (in dB SL) of a tone at the most normal frequency judged equal in loudness to the tinnitus.

摘要

我们试图确定一种考虑响度重振的有意义的耳鸣响度测量方法。16名感音神经性耳鸣患者调整纯音的水平,使其(a)处于阈值,(b)响度与耳鸣相等,以及(c)响度达到不适程度。纯音频率为(a)耳鸣音调的频率,以及(b)在500至4000Hz之间具有最接近0dB HL纯音阈值的倍频程频率。此外,受试者调整宽带噪声的水平,使其(a)处于阈值,(b)刚好掩盖耳鸣,以及(c)响度达到不适程度。这些测量在耳鸣同侧耳和对侧耳中均进行。提出了基于异常响度函数和不适响度水平的公式,这些公式将以dB感觉级(SL)表示的等响度匹配转换为以宋为单位的响度。对于我们的大多数受试者,无论耳鸣位于哪只耳朵,掩盖耳鸣所需的宽带噪声水平(以dB SL为单位)在同侧耳和对侧耳中大致相同。这种掩盖耳鸣所需的噪声水平(以dB SL为单位)与在判断为响度与耳鸣相等的最正常频率下的纯音水平(以dB SL为单位)密切相关。

相似文献

1
The determination of tinnitus loudness considering the effects of recruitment.考虑重振效应的耳鸣响度测定
J Speech Hear Res. 1983 Mar;26(1):59-72. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2601.59.
2
Tinnitus loudness matchings in relation to annoyance and grading of severity.耳鸣响度匹配与烦恼及严重程度分级的关系。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2003 May;30(2):129-33. doi: 10.1016/s0385-8146(03)00008-7.
3
Judgments and measurements of the loudness of tinnitus before and after masking.耳鸣掩蔽前后响度的判断与测量。
J Speech Hear Res. 1988 Dec;31(4):582-7. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3104.582.
4
The effect of continuous monaural noise on loudness matches to tinnitus.持续单耳噪声对耳鸣响度匹配的影响。
J Speech Hear Res. 1988 Mar;31(1):98-102. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3101.98.
5
Estimation of the loudness of tinnitus from matching tests.通过匹配测试评估耳鸣响度。
Br J Audiol. 1992 Dec;26(6):387-95. doi: 10.3109/03005369209076663.
6
Testing the concept of softness imperception: loudness near threshold for hearing-impaired ears.测试听觉感知缺失概念:听力受损耳朵的阈上响度
J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Jun;115(6):3103-11. doi: 10.1121/1.1738839.
7
A comparison of different methods for assessing the 'intensity' of tinnitus.评估耳鸣“强度”的不同方法比较
Acta Otolaryngol. 1985 May-Jun;99(5-6):501-8. doi: 10.3109/00016488509182253.
8
Tinnitus in a single-sided deaf ear reduces speech reception in the nontinnitus ear.单侧聋患者的耳鸣会降低对非耳鸣耳的言语感知。
Otol Neurotol. 2013 Jun;34(4):662-6. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31828779f0.
9
Measures of tinnitus: step size, matches to imagined tones, and masking patterns.耳鸣的测量方法:步长、与想象音调的匹配以及掩蔽模式。
Ear Hear. 1992 Dec;13(6):410-6.
10
Equal-loudness contours using subjective tinnitus as the standard.以主观耳鸣为标准的等响度曲线。
J Speech Hear Res. 1984 Jun;27(2):274-9. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2702.274.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychiatric Comorbidities in Hyperacusis and Misophonia: A Systematic Review.听觉过敏和恐音症中的精神共病:一项系统综述。
Audiol Res. 2025 Aug 7;15(4):101. doi: 10.3390/audiolres15040101.
2
Investigation of Listening Effort in Tinnitus Patients by Providing Similar Peripheral Auditory Function With Control Group.通过使耳鸣患者的外周听觉功能与对照组相似来研究耳鸣患者的聆听努力程度。
Brain Behav. 2025 Feb;15(2):e70306. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70306.
3
Differential cortical activation patterns: pioneering sub-classification of tinnitus with and without hyperacusis by combining audiometry, gamma oscillations, and hemodynamics.
不同的皮质激活模式:通过结合听力测定、伽马振荡和血液动力学对伴有和不伴有听觉过敏的耳鸣进行开创性的亚分类。
Front Neurosci. 2024 Jan 4;17:1232446. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1232446. eCollection 2023.
4
Hyperacusis Assessment Questionnaire-A New Tool Assessing Hyperacusis in Subjects with Tinnitus.听觉过敏评估问卷——一种评估耳鸣患者听觉过敏的新工具。
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 19;12(20):6622. doi: 10.3390/jcm12206622.
5
The effect of caffeine on tinnitus: Randomized triple-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial.咖啡因对耳鸣的影响:随机、三盲、安慰剂对照的临床试验。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 20;16(9):e0256275. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256275. eCollection 2021.
6
What Tinnitus Therapy Outcome Measures Are Important for Patients?- A Discrete Choice Experiment.哪些耳鸣治疗结果指标对患者很重要?——一项离散选择实验
Front Neurol. 2021 May 25;12:668880. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.668880. eCollection 2021.
7
Decreased Sound Tolerance in Tinnitus Patients.耳鸣患者对声音的耐受性降低。
Life (Basel). 2021 Jan 26;11(2):87. doi: 10.3390/life11020087.
8
Noise Induced Hearing Loss and Tinnitus-New Research Developments and Remaining Gaps in Disease Assessment, Treatment, and Prevention.噪声性听力损失与耳鸣——疾病评估、治疗及预防方面的新研究进展与尚存差距
Brain Sci. 2020 Oct 13;10(10):732. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10100732.
9
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy For Alleviating The Distress Caused By Tinnitus, Hyperacusis And Misophonia: Current Perspectives.认知行为疗法缓解耳鸣、恐声症和恐音症所致痛苦:当前观点
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2019 Oct 23;12:991-1002. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S179138. eCollection 2019.
10
Tinnitus distress: a paradoxical attention to the sound?耳鸣困扰:对声音的矛盾关注?
J Neurol. 2019 Sep;266(9):2197-2207. doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09390-1. Epub 2019 May 31.