• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在微创经皮肾镜取石术中使用扩展频率的摩西2.0和优化后的摩西与高功率激光对比:一项随机对照试验

Use of Moses 2.0 with extended frequency and optimized Moses vs. high-power laser in MiniPCNL: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Emiliani Esteban, Kanashiro Andres Koey, Balaña Josep, Fontanet Sofía, Aumatell Julia, Calderón-Cortez Julio, Iregui-Parra Juan, Sanchez-Pui Antoni, Sanchez-Martin Francisco, Millan Felix, Angerri Oriol

机构信息

Department of Urology, Fundación Puigvert. Autonomous University of Barcelona, Calle Cartagena 340, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.

Department of Urology, Clinica nueva de Cali. Department of Epidemiology, Interdisciplinary Group of Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (GIESP), Libre University, Cali, Colombia.

出版信息

Urolithiasis. 2023 Apr 19;51(1):75. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01443-5.

DOI:10.1007/s00240-023-01443-5
PMID:37074477
Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare standard high-power laser (with < 80 Hz) to extended frequency (> 100 Hz) lithotripsy during miniPCNL. 40 patients were randomized in to two groups undergoing MiniPCNL. For both groups, the Holmium Pulse laser Moses 2.0 (Lumenis) was used. For group A, standard high-power laser with < 80 Hz, with Moses distance was set using up to 3 J. For Group B, extended frequency (100-120 Hz) was used allowing up to 0.6 J. All patients underwent MiniPCNL using an 18 Fr balloon access. Demographics were comparable between groups. Mean stone diameter was 19 mm (14-23) with no differences between groups (p = 0.14). Mean operative time was 91 and 87 min for group A and B (p = 0.71), mean laser time was similar in both groups, 6.5 min and 7.5 min, respectively (p = 0.52) as well as the number of laser activations during the surgery (p = 0.43). Mean Watts used was 18 and 16 respectively being similar in both groups (p = 0.54) as well as the total KJoules (p = 0.29). Endoscopic vision was good in all surgeries. The endoscopic and radiologic stone free rate was achieved in all patients expect for two in both groups (p = 0.72). Two Clavien I complications were seen, a small bleeding for group A and a small pelvic perforation in group B. The use of high-power holmium laser with extended frequency and optimized Moses was effective and safe being comparable to standard high-power laser for MiniPCNL allowing more versatility with the setting range.

摘要

本研究的目的是在微创经皮肾镜取石术(miniPCNL)期间,比较标准高功率激光(频率<80Hz)与扩展频率(>100Hz)的碎石术。40例患者被随机分为两组接受miniPCNL。两组均使用钬脉冲激光摩西2.0(科医人公司)。A组使用频率<80Hz的标准高功率激光,摩西距离设置为最多3J。B组使用扩展频率(100 - 120Hz),能量最多0.6J。所有患者均使用18F球囊通道进行miniPCNL。两组患者的人口统计学特征具有可比性。平均结石直径为19mm(14 - 23mm),两组之间无差异(p = 0.14)。A组和B组的平均手术时间分别为91分钟和87分钟(p = 0.71),两组的平均激光时间相似,分别为6.5分钟和7.5分钟(p = 0.52),手术期间的激光激活次数也相似(p = 0.43)。两组平均使用的瓦特数分别为18和16,相似(p = 0.54),总千焦数也相似(p = 0.29)。所有手术的内镜视野均良好。除两组各有2例患者外,所有患者均实现了内镜和放射学无石率(p = 0.72)。观察到2例Clavien I级并发症,A组有少量出血,B组有小的盆腔穿孔。使用扩展频率和优化摩西技术的高功率钬激光有效且安全,与标准高功率激光用于miniPCNL相当,在设置范围上具有更多的通用性。

相似文献

1
Use of Moses 2.0 with extended frequency and optimized Moses vs. high-power laser in MiniPCNL: a randomized controlled trial.在微创经皮肾镜取石术中使用扩展频率的摩西2.0和优化后的摩西与高功率激光对比:一项随机对照试验
Urolithiasis. 2023 Apr 19;51(1):75. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01443-5.
2
Size Distribution of Fragments by High-power Holmium Laser Lithotripsy in MiniPCNL with Suction.钬激光碎石术联合负压吸引在微创经皮肾镜取石术中对结石碎片大小分布的影响。
Curr Urol Rep. 2021 Dec 16;22(12):64. doi: 10.1007/s11934-021-01072-8.
3
Double-Blinded Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Regular and Moses Modes of Holmium Laser Lithotripsy.双盲前瞻性随机临床试验比较钬激光碎石术的常规模式和摩西模式。
J Endourol. 2020 May;34(5):624-628. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0695. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
4
Use of the Moses Technology to Improve Holmium Laser Lithotripsy Outcomes: A Preclinical Study.使用摩西技术改善钬激光碎石术的疗效:一项临床前研究。
J Endourol. 2017 Jun;31(6):598-604. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0050. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
5
Dusting Efficiency of the Moses Holmium Laser: An Automated In Vitro Assessment.摩西钬激光的除尘效率:一项自动体外评估。
J Endourol. 2018 Dec;32(12):1131-1135. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0660. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
6
The Efficiency of Moses Technology Holmium Laser for Treating Renal Stones During Flexible Ureteroscopy: Relationship Between Stone Volume, Time, and Energy.摩西技术钬激光治疗输尿管软镜下肾结石的效率:结石体积、时间和能量的关系。
J Endourol. 2021 Dec;35(S3):S14-S21. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0592.
7
Holmium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Laser Pulse Type Affects Irrigation Temperatures in a Benchtop Ureteral Model.钬:钇铝石榴石激光脉冲类型对桌面输尿管模型中的冲洗温度的影响。
J Endourol. 2019 Nov;33(11):896-901. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0496. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
8
Comparison of Different Pulse Modulation Modes for Holmium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Laser Lithotripsy Ablation in a Benchtop Model.不同脉冲调制模式在钬:石榴石激光碎石消融中的比较。
J Endourol. 2022 Jan;36(1):29-37. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0113. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
9
Does Moses technology enhance the efficiency and outcomes of regular holmium laser lithotripsy? Results of a pooled analysis of comparative studies.摩西技术是否能提高常规钬激光碎石术的效率和效果?对比较研究的汇总分析结果。
Lasers Med Sci. 2023 Feb 17;38(1):73. doi: 10.1007/s10103-023-03730-4.
10
Moses 2.0 for High-Power Ureteroscopic Stone Dusting: Clinical Principles for Step-by-Step Video Technique.摩西 2.0 用于高能输尿管镜碎石术:分步骤视频技术的临床原则。
J Endourol. 2021 Dec;35(S3):S22-S28. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0682.

本文引用的文献

1
A Practical Guide for Intra-Renal Temperature and Pressure Management during Rirs: What Is the Evidence Telling Us.经皮肾镜碎石术中肾内温度和压力管理实用指南:证据告诉了我们什么。
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 15;11(12):3429. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123429.
2
Percutaneous laser nephrolithotripsy: is it here to stay? Results of a systematic review.经皮激光肾镜碎石术:它会持续存在吗?一项系统评价的结果
Curr Opin Urol. 2022 Mar 1;32(2):185-191. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000959.
3
Simplified biplanar (0-90°) fluoroscopic puncture technique for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: the learning curve.
简化的双平面(0-90°)透视穿刺技术在经皮肾镜取石术中的应用:学习曲线。
World J Urol. 2021 Sep;39(9):3657-3663. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03669-7. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
4
Recent advances in percutaneous lithotripsy techniques.经皮碎石术技术的最新进展。
Curr Opin Urol. 2021 Jan;31(1):24-28. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000829.
5
The role of laser in percutaneous surgery. Is this the best option for this approach?激光在经皮手术中的作用。这是这种手术方法的最佳选择吗?
Arch Esp Urol. 2020 Oct;73(8):753-766.
6
Comparison of intrapelvic pressures during flexible ureteroscopy, mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy, standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in a kidney model.在肾脏模型中比较柔性输尿管镜检查术、微经皮肾镜取石术、标准经皮肾镜取石术和内镜联合肾内手术时的肾盂内压力。
World J Urol. 2021 Jul;39(7):2709-2717. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03450-2. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
7
Impact of the Curve Diameter and Laser Settings on Laser Fiber Fracture.弯曲直径和激光设置对激光光纤断裂的影响。
J Endourol. 2017 Sep;31(9):918-921. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0006. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
8
Tract Sizes in Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review from the European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Guidelines Panel.微创经皮肾取石术中的通道大小:欧洲泌尿外科学会结石指南专家组的系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2017 Aug;72(2):220-235. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.01.046. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
9
Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with high-power holmium YAG laser in pediatric patients with staghorn and complex calculi.小儿鹿角形结石和复杂性结石患者的大功率钬激光微创经皮肾镜取石术
J Pediatr Urol. 2016 Aug;12(4):253.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.04.027. Epub 2016 May 26.
10
Minimally invasive versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis.微创经皮肾镜取石术与标准经皮肾镜取石术:一项荟萃分析。
Urolithiasis. 2015 Nov;43(6):563-70. doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0808-y. Epub 2015 Aug 5.