Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
J Endourol. 2020 May;34(5):624-628. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0695. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
To compare regular and Moses modes of holmium laser lithotripsy during ureteroscopy in terms of fragmentation/pulverization and procedural times in addition to perioperative complications. After obtaining ethics approval, a prospective double-blinded randomized trial was conducted for patients undergoing holmium laser lithotripsy during retrograde ureteroscopy. Patients were randomly assigned to either regular or Moses modes. Patients and surgeons were blinded to the laser mode. Lumenis 120W generator with 200 Moses D/F/L fibers were used. Demographic data, stone parameters, perioperative complications, and success rates were compared. The degree of stone retropulsion was graded on a Likert scale from 0-no retropulsion to 3-maximum retropulsion. A total of 72 patients were included in the study (36 per arm). Both groups were comparable in terms of age and preoperative stone size (1.4 cm 1.7 cm, > 0.05). When compared with the regular mode, Moses mode was associated with significantly lower fragmentation/pulverization time (21.1 minutes 14.2 minutes; = 0.03) and procedural time (50.9 minutes 41.1 minutes, = 0.03). However, there were no significant differences in terms of lasing time (7.4 minutes 6.1 minutes, > 0.05) and total energy applied to the stones (11.1 kJ 10.8 kJ, > 0.05). Moses mode was associated with significantly less retropulsion (mean grade was 1.0 0.5, = 0.01). There were no significant differences between both modes in terms of intraoperative complications (11.1% 8.3%, > 0.05), with one patient requiring endoureterotomy for stricture in the Moses group. Success rate at the end of 3 months was comparable between both groups (83.3% 88.4%, > 0.05). Moses technology was associated with significantly lower fragmentation/pulverization and procedural times. The reduced fragmentation/pulverization time seen using Moses technology could be explained by the significantly lower retropulsion of stones during laser lithotripsy.
比较输尿管镜钬激光碎石术中常规模式和摩西模式在碎石/粉碎时间以及围手术期并发症方面的差异。在获得伦理批准后,对接受逆行输尿管镜钬激光碎石术的患者进行了前瞻性双盲随机试验。患者被随机分配到常规模式或摩西模式。患者和外科医生对激光模式均不知情。使用 Lumenis 120W 发生器和 200 摩西 D/F/L 光纤。比较两组患者的人口统计学数据、结石参数、围手术期并发症和成功率。结石后退程度按 Likert 量表评分,从 0-无后退到 3-最大后退。共有 72 例患者纳入研究(每组 36 例)。两组患者的年龄和术前结石大小(1.4cm 1.7cm,>0.05)均无差异。与常规模式相比,摩西模式碎石/粉碎时间(21.1 分钟 14.2 分钟;=0.03)和手术时间(50.9 分钟 41.1 分钟;=0.03)明显缩短。然而,激光时间(7.4 分钟 6.1 分钟;>0.05)和施加到结石的总能量(11.1kJ 10.8kJ;>0.05)无显著差异。摩西模式后退程度明显较轻(平均等级为 1.0 0.5;=0.01)。两种模式术中并发症无显著差异(11.1% 8.3%;>0.05),摩西组有 1 例患者因狭窄需要行输尿管内切开术。术后 3 个月的成功率在两组间无差异(83.3% 88.4%;>0.05)。摩西技术碎石/粉碎时间和手术时间明显缩短。摩西技术碎石/粉碎时间缩短可能与激光碎石过程中结石后退程度明显减轻有关。